Apache2.4.25 using system default openssl instead of new version provided during compilationCompiling Apache...
Book: Young man exiled to a penal colony, helps to lead revolution
Bacteria contamination inside a thermos bottle
Relationship between sampajanna definitions in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35
How difficult is it to simply disable/disengage the MCAS on Boeing 737 Max 8 & 9 Aircraft?
How to explain that I do not want to visit a country due to personal safety concern?
I got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?
Adventure Game (text based) in C++
Is it insecure to send a password in a `curl` command?
Print a physical multiplication table
Do the common programs (for example: "ls", "cat") in Linux and BSD come from the same source code?
Is it ever recommended to use mean/multiple imputation when using tree-based predictive models?
Why does overlay work only on the first tcolorbox?
Can I use USB data pins as a power source?
The meaning of 振り in 無茶振り
Is Manda another name for Saturn (Shani)?
What is the relationship between relativity and the Doppler effect?
Do I need to be arrogant to get ahead?
Is it normal that my co-workers at a fitness company criticize my food choices?
Could this Scherzo by Beethoven be considered to be a fugue?
Encrypting then Base64 Encoding
World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?
Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?
How to pronounce "I ♥ Huckabees"?
Why do tuner card drivers fail to build after kernel update to 4.4.0-143-generic?
Apache2.4.25 using system default openssl instead of new version provided during compilation
Compiling Apache mod_ssl for different target hardware (hardware capability unsupported SSE2 error)How to get httrack to work with SSL on mac os x? (libssl.so not found)Can't get Apache 2.2.21 to compile with OpenSSL supportCompile apache 2.2.23 on Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS with openssl errorServer still vulnerable to HeartBleed after Openssl updateHow to make openssl s_client using default CANginx reverting to sslv3Browser and openSSL return different certificatesBuilding curl, httpd and others with custom openssl build, while avoiding default system openssltwo versions of openssl?
Trying to compile apache2.4.25 from source on Fedora 15 with dynamically linked mod_ssl. Fedora15 server has a default openssl version (OpenSSL 1.0.0j-fips 10 May 2012) and newer openssl library (OpenSSL 1.0.2g 1 Mar 2016) is installed in /usr/local/ssl/bin.
Compilation steps
./configure --enable-ssl=shared --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl/lib --with-pcre=/usr/local/pcre/lib/pcre-config
make
make install
After installation, shared library is still pointing to older openssl version
ldd /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_ssl.so
libssl.so.10 => /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 (0x00007fb715087000)
ls -lrt /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Jun 2 14:43 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 -> libssl.so.1.0.0j
libssl.s0.10 has a sym link to system default openssl version.
Tried compiling without specific custom path to openssl library and still the same results with libssl.so still pointing to system openssl version.
Even tried setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH env variable to point to new openssl lib path, yet no luck.
apache-2.4 openssl mod-ssl
edited Jun 3 '17 at 4:15
Esa Jokinen
23.4k23359
asked Jun 3 '17 at 3:52
user2839891user2839891
11
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 11 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
Trying to compile apache2.4.25 from source on Fedora 15 with dynamically linked mod_ssl. Fedora15 server has a default openssl version (OpenSSL 1.0.0j-fips 10 May 2012) and newer openssl library (OpenSSL 1.0.2g 1 Mar 2016) is installed in /usr/local/ssl/bin.
Compilation steps
./configure --enable-ssl=shared --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl/lib --with-pcre=/usr/local/pcre/lib/pcre-config
make
make install
After installation, shared library is still pointing to older openssl version
ldd /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_ssl.so
libssl.so.10 => /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 (0x00007fb715087000)
ls -lrt /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Jun 2 14:43 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 -> libssl.so.1.0.0j
libssl.s0.10 has a sym link to system default openssl version.
Tried compiling without specific custom path to openssl library and still the same results with libssl.so still pointing to system openssl version.
Even tried setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH env variable to point to new openssl lib path, yet no luck.
apache-2.4 openssl mod-ssl
edited Jun 3 '17 at 4:15
Esa Jokinen
23.4k23359
asked Jun 3 '17 at 3:52
user2839891user2839891
11
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 11 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
if your dir with the new libs is /mynewlibs and it contains four libs: libssl.so -> libssl.so.10, libssl.so.10, libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.10, libcrypto.so.10,then after invoking in the same shell export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/mynewlibs/ you will have your ldd output pointed top the right libs
– Oleg
Jun 3 '17 at 12:55
add a comment |
Trying to compile apache2.4.25 from source on Fedora 15 with dynamically linked mod_ssl. Fedora15 server has a default openssl version (OpenSSL 1.0.0j-fips 10 May 2012) and newer openssl library (OpenSSL 1.0.2g 1 Mar 2016) is installed in /usr/local/ssl/bin.
Compilation steps
./configure --enable-ssl=shared --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl/lib --with-pcre=/usr/local/pcre/lib/pcre-config
make
make install
After installation, shared library is still pointing to older openssl version
ldd /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_ssl.so
libssl.so.10 => /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 (0x00007fb715087000)
ls -lrt /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Jun 2 14:43 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 -> libssl.so.1.0.0j
libssl.s0.10 has a sym link to system default openssl version.
Tried compiling without specific custom path to openssl library and still the same results with libssl.so still pointing to system openssl version.
Even tried setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH env variable to point to new openssl lib path, yet no luck.
apache-2.4 openssl mod-ssl
edited Jun 3 '17 at 4:15
Esa Jokinen
23.4k23359
asked Jun 3 '17 at 3:52
user2839891user2839891
11
Trying to compile apache2.4.25 from source on Fedora 15 with dynamically linked mod_ssl. Fedora15 server has a default openssl version (OpenSSL 1.0.0j-fips 10 May 2012) and newer openssl library (OpenSSL 1.0.2g 1 Mar 2016) is installed in /usr/local/ssl/bin.
Compilation steps
./configure --enable-ssl=shared --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl/lib --with-pcre=/usr/local/pcre/lib/pcre-config
make
make install
After installation, shared library is still pointing to older openssl version
ldd /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_ssl.so
libssl.so.10 => /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 (0x00007fb715087000)
ls -lrt /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Jun 2 14:43 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 -> libssl.so.1.0.0j
libssl.s0.10 has a sym link to system default openssl version.
Tried compiling without specific custom path to openssl library and still the same results with libssl.so still pointing to system openssl version.
Even tried setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH env variable to point to new openssl lib path, yet no luck.
apache-2.4 openssl mod-ssl
apache-2.4 openssl mod-ssl
edited Jun 3 '17 at 4:15
Esa Jokinen
23.4k23359
asked Jun 3 '17 at 3:52
user2839891user2839891
11
edited Jun 3 '17 at 4:15
Esa Jokinen
23.4k23359
asked Jun 3 '17 at 3:52
user2839891user2839891
11
edited Jun 3 '17 at 4:15
Esa Jokinen
23.4k23359
edited Jun 3 '17 at 4:15
Esa Jokinen
23.4k23359
edited Jun 3 '17 at 4:15
Esa Jokinen
23.4k23359
23.4k23359
asked Jun 3 '17 at 3:52
user2839891user2839891
11
asked Jun 3 '17 at 3:52
user2839891user2839891
11
asked Jun 3 '17 at 3:52
user2839891user2839891
11
11
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 11 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 11 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
if your dir with the new libs is /mynewlibs and it contains four libs: libssl.so -> libssl.so.10, libssl.so.10, libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.10, libcrypto.so.10,then after invoking in the same shell export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/mynewlibs/ you will have your ldd output pointed top the right libs
– Oleg
Jun 3 '17 at 12:55
add a comment |
if your dir with the new libs is /mynewlibs and it contains four libs: libssl.so -> libssl.so.10, libssl.so.10, libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.10, libcrypto.so.10,then after invoking in the same shell export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/mynewlibs/ you will have your ldd output pointed top the right libs
– Oleg
Jun 3 '17 at 12:55
if your dir with the new libs is /mynewlibs and it contains four libs: libssl.so -> libssl.so.10, libssl.so.10, libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.10, libcrypto.so.10,then after invoking in the same shell export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/mynewlibs/ you will have your ldd output pointed top the right libs
– Oleg
Jun 3 '17 at 12:55
if your dir with the new libs is /mynewlibs and it contains four libs: libssl.so -> libssl.so.10, libssl.so.10, libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.10, libcrypto.so.10,then after invoking in the same shell export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/mynewlibs/ you will have your ldd output pointed top the right libs
– Oleg
Jun 3 '17 at 12:55
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Solved this issue by deleting the old openssl library(libssl.so.10) and recompiling with the latest openssl library. Once this was installed, copied the older libssl.so file back to the directory it was initially in. This has solved the issue for now, but not recommended on a production server :)
answered Jun 5 '17 at 19:10
user2839891user2839891
11
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f853761%2fapache2-4-25-using-system-default-openssl-instead-of-new-version-provided-during%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Solved this issue by deleting the old openssl library(libssl.so.10) and recompiling with the latest openssl library. Once this was installed, copied the older libssl.so file back to the directory it was initially in. This has solved the issue for now, but not recommended on a production server :)
answered Jun 5 '17 at 19:10
user2839891user2839891
11
add a comment |
Solved this issue by deleting the old openssl library(libssl.so.10) and recompiling with the latest openssl library. Once this was installed, copied the older libssl.so file back to the directory it was initially in. This has solved the issue for now, but not recommended on a production server :)
answered Jun 5 '17 at 19:10
user2839891user2839891
11
add a comment |
Solved this issue by deleting the old openssl library(libssl.so.10) and recompiling with the latest openssl library. Once this was installed, copied the older libssl.so file back to the directory it was initially in. This has solved the issue for now, but not recommended on a production server :)
answered Jun 5 '17 at 19:10
user2839891user2839891
11
Solved this issue by deleting the old openssl library(libssl.so.10) and recompiling with the latest openssl library. Once this was installed, copied the older libssl.so file back to the directory it was initially in. This has solved the issue for now, but not recommended on a production server :)
answered Jun 5 '17 at 19:10
user2839891user2839891
11
answered Jun 5 '17 at 19:10
user2839891user2839891
11
answered Jun 5 '17 at 19:10
user2839891user2839891
11
answered Jun 5 '17 at 19:10
user2839891user2839891
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f853761%2fapache2-4-25-using-system-default-openssl-instead-of-new-version-provided-during%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
if your dir with the new libs is /mynewlibs and it contains four libs: libssl.so -> libssl.so.10, libssl.so.10, libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.10, libcrypto.so.10,then after invoking in the same shell export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/mynewlibs/ you will have your ldd output pointed top the right libs
– Oleg
Jun 3 '17 at 12:55