Linux Bridges - Tags on interface vs. on bridgeNAT and two bridgesMultiple, different VLAN trunks to KVM...

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

How to kill a localhost:8080

Can a space-faring robot still function over a billion years?

The need of reserving one's ability in job interviews

At what level can a party fight a mimic?

Difference between 'stomach' and 'uterus'

Non-Italian European mafias in USA?

Citing contemporaneous (interlaced?) preprints

What does @RC mean in SSDT SQL Server Unit Testing?

How to evaluate the limit where something is raised to a power of x?

Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?

Misplaced tyre lever - alternatives?

Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?

How do you say "powers of ten"?

Is it possible to make a clamp function shorter than a ternary in JS?

How to substitute values from a list into a function?

What is this waxed root vegetable?

Sometimes a banana is just a banana

How to make a *empty* field behaves like a *null* field when it comes to standard values?

Giving a talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

How do I deal with being jealous of my own players?

Are paired adjectives bad style?

Get length of the longest sequence of numbers with the same sign

Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?



Linux Bridges - Tags on interface vs. on bridge


NAT and two bridgesMultiple, different VLAN trunks to KVM guests (Linux)KVM virtualization with two bridges, want routing to use each bridge as mapped in KVMBridging multiple VLANs in linuxCan a single physical interface act as a “slave” for multiple bridge interfaces?IP conflict on a KVM bridge network connectionKVM/libvirt: Guest monopolizes bridgesplitting tagged and untagged traffic to bridges on KVMlinux firewall as a router in CentOS 7Linux Security - Systemd-networkd (Clear Linux) - Topolgy of bridge interfaces (br0/br1)













0















What is the difference between tagging on the bridge vs a physical interface then adding that tagged interface onto the bridge?



I'm assuming if I want two total VLANs segmenting network traffic to guests on KVM. I don't want the guests seeing the tag, I just want the VLANs to segregate traffic through the interfaces. Meaning the guests should not see the tags (unless packets are double-tagged).



Each scenario would look as follows:



Tagging on interface:

em1 -> em1.3 -> br0 -> vnet0 -> em1

em1 -> em1.4 -> br1 -> vnet1 -> em2



Tagging on bridge:

em1 -> br0 -> br0.3 -> vnet0 -> em1

em1 -> br0 -> br0.4 -> vnet1 -> em2



Is net effect the same?
Or is there some functional difference I'm missing here?



EDIT: I've been reading (http://blog.davidvassallo.me/2012/05/05/kvm-brctl-in-linux-bringing-vlans-to-the-guests/), and it seems like tagging on physical interfaces (em1.3) causes linux to strip the tag prior to it sending it off to the bridge. Whereas tagging on the bridge just passes the tagged traffic through. True? If not, where is the tagged stripped/added?










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 9 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.




















    0















    What is the difference between tagging on the bridge vs a physical interface then adding that tagged interface onto the bridge?



    I'm assuming if I want two total VLANs segmenting network traffic to guests on KVM. I don't want the guests seeing the tag, I just want the VLANs to segregate traffic through the interfaces. Meaning the guests should not see the tags (unless packets are double-tagged).



    Each scenario would look as follows:



    Tagging on interface:

    em1 -> em1.3 -> br0 -> vnet0 -> em1

    em1 -> em1.4 -> br1 -> vnet1 -> em2



    Tagging on bridge:

    em1 -> br0 -> br0.3 -> vnet0 -> em1

    em1 -> br0 -> br0.4 -> vnet1 -> em2



    Is net effect the same?
    Or is there some functional difference I'm missing here?



    EDIT: I've been reading (http://blog.davidvassallo.me/2012/05/05/kvm-brctl-in-linux-bringing-vlans-to-the-guests/), and it seems like tagging on physical interfaces (em1.3) causes linux to strip the tag prior to it sending it off to the bridge. Whereas tagging on the bridge just passes the tagged traffic through. True? If not, where is the tagged stripped/added?










    share|improve this question
















    bumped to the homepage by Community 9 mins ago


    This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.


















      0












      0








      0








      What is the difference between tagging on the bridge vs a physical interface then adding that tagged interface onto the bridge?



      I'm assuming if I want two total VLANs segmenting network traffic to guests on KVM. I don't want the guests seeing the tag, I just want the VLANs to segregate traffic through the interfaces. Meaning the guests should not see the tags (unless packets are double-tagged).



      Each scenario would look as follows:



      Tagging on interface:

      em1 -> em1.3 -> br0 -> vnet0 -> em1

      em1 -> em1.4 -> br1 -> vnet1 -> em2



      Tagging on bridge:

      em1 -> br0 -> br0.3 -> vnet0 -> em1

      em1 -> br0 -> br0.4 -> vnet1 -> em2



      Is net effect the same?
      Or is there some functional difference I'm missing here?



      EDIT: I've been reading (http://blog.davidvassallo.me/2012/05/05/kvm-brctl-in-linux-bringing-vlans-to-the-guests/), and it seems like tagging on physical interfaces (em1.3) causes linux to strip the tag prior to it sending it off to the bridge. Whereas tagging on the bridge just passes the tagged traffic through. True? If not, where is the tagged stripped/added?










      share|improve this question
















      What is the difference between tagging on the bridge vs a physical interface then adding that tagged interface onto the bridge?



      I'm assuming if I want two total VLANs segmenting network traffic to guests on KVM. I don't want the guests seeing the tag, I just want the VLANs to segregate traffic through the interfaces. Meaning the guests should not see the tags (unless packets are double-tagged).



      Each scenario would look as follows:



      Tagging on interface:

      em1 -> em1.3 -> br0 -> vnet0 -> em1

      em1 -> em1.4 -> br1 -> vnet1 -> em2



      Tagging on bridge:

      em1 -> br0 -> br0.3 -> vnet0 -> em1

      em1 -> br0 -> br0.4 -> vnet1 -> em2



      Is net effect the same?
      Or is there some functional difference I'm missing here?



      EDIT: I've been reading (http://blog.davidvassallo.me/2012/05/05/kvm-brctl-in-linux-bringing-vlans-to-the-guests/), and it seems like tagging on physical interfaces (em1.3) causes linux to strip the tag prior to it sending it off to the bridge. Whereas tagging on the bridge just passes the tagged traffic through. True? If not, where is the tagged stripped/added?







      linux vlan bridge






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 3 '14 at 12:16







      rainereality

















      asked Apr 2 '14 at 23:25









      rainerealityrainereality

      1871214




      1871214





      bumped to the homepage by Community 9 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







      bumped to the homepage by Community 9 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0















          What is the difference between tagging on the bridge vs a physical
          interface then adding that tagged interface onto the bridge?




          The difference is that you may not want all the interfaces in the bridge to be tagged.




          Is net effect the same? Or is there some functional difference I'm
          missing here?




          If you want all traffic traversing the bridge to be tagged, then there is no difference.



          Convention, though, is to tag interfaces.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Are you saying that if I go em1.3 it will strip the tag prior to shipping the traffic off through to the bridge?

            – rainereality
            Apr 3 '14 at 1:43











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "2"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f586298%2flinux-bridges-tags-on-interface-vs-on-bridge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0















          What is the difference between tagging on the bridge vs a physical
          interface then adding that tagged interface onto the bridge?




          The difference is that you may not want all the interfaces in the bridge to be tagged.




          Is net effect the same? Or is there some functional difference I'm
          missing here?




          If you want all traffic traversing the bridge to be tagged, then there is no difference.



          Convention, though, is to tag interfaces.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Are you saying that if I go em1.3 it will strip the tag prior to shipping the traffic off through to the bridge?

            – rainereality
            Apr 3 '14 at 1:43
















          0















          What is the difference between tagging on the bridge vs a physical
          interface then adding that tagged interface onto the bridge?




          The difference is that you may not want all the interfaces in the bridge to be tagged.




          Is net effect the same? Or is there some functional difference I'm
          missing here?




          If you want all traffic traversing the bridge to be tagged, then there is no difference.



          Convention, though, is to tag interfaces.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Are you saying that if I go em1.3 it will strip the tag prior to shipping the traffic off through to the bridge?

            – rainereality
            Apr 3 '14 at 1:43














          0












          0








          0








          What is the difference between tagging on the bridge vs a physical
          interface then adding that tagged interface onto the bridge?




          The difference is that you may not want all the interfaces in the bridge to be tagged.




          Is net effect the same? Or is there some functional difference I'm
          missing here?




          If you want all traffic traversing the bridge to be tagged, then there is no difference.



          Convention, though, is to tag interfaces.






          share|improve this answer














          What is the difference between tagging on the bridge vs a physical
          interface then adding that tagged interface onto the bridge?




          The difference is that you may not want all the interfaces in the bridge to be tagged.




          Is net effect the same? Or is there some functional difference I'm
          missing here?




          If you want all traffic traversing the bridge to be tagged, then there is no difference.



          Convention, though, is to tag interfaces.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 3 '14 at 0:02









          EEAAEEAA

          102k16148219




          102k16148219













          • Are you saying that if I go em1.3 it will strip the tag prior to shipping the traffic off through to the bridge?

            – rainereality
            Apr 3 '14 at 1:43



















          • Are you saying that if I go em1.3 it will strip the tag prior to shipping the traffic off through to the bridge?

            – rainereality
            Apr 3 '14 at 1:43

















          Are you saying that if I go em1.3 it will strip the tag prior to shipping the traffic off through to the bridge?

          – rainereality
          Apr 3 '14 at 1:43





          Are you saying that if I go em1.3 it will strip the tag prior to shipping the traffic off through to the bridge?

          – rainereality
          Apr 3 '14 at 1:43


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f586298%2flinux-bridges-tags-on-interface-vs-on-bridge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          As a Security Precaution, the user account has been locked The Next CEO of Stack OverflowMS...

          Список ссавців Італії Природоохоронні статуси | Список |...

          Українські прізвища Зміст Історичні відомості |...