Ryfujk

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

Is it wise to focus on putting odd beats on left when playing double bass drums?

aging parents with no investments

What does "enim et" mean?

Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?

Can I legally use front facing blue light in the UK?

Is ipsum/ipsa/ipse a third person pronoun, or can it serve other functions?

Can the Produce Flame cantrip be used to grapple, or as an unarmed strike, in the right circumstances?

Why was the "bread communication" in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?

Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet

Is there a way to make member function NOT callable from constructor?

How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?

Lied on resume at previous job

Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning

What is the meaning of "of trouble" in the following sentence?

Denied boarding due to overcrowding, Sparpreis ticket. What are my rights?

Is every set a filtered colimit of finite sets?

Why do we use polarized capacitors?

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Does bootstrapped regression allow for inference?

Is Fable (1996) connected in any way to the Fable franchise from Lionhead Studios?

Hosting Wordpress in a EC2 Load Balanced Instance

Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money

Is ipsum/ipsa/ipse a third person pronoun, or can it serve other functions?

How would you say “same thing” in Latin?When can *quis* be used as an adjective interrogative pronoun?Is there a gender-neutral pronoun for people in Latin?“Eidem suae”: a way to make the reflexive pronoun refer to someone other than the subject?Where did the missing forms of nemo go?“Us versus them” - opposite of “noster”?Is a relative pronoun commonly used as a third person pronoun? (Metamorphoses I.583-587)Do adverbs derived from iste have a pejorative tone?Does Latin have a mechanism to disambiguate possessive pronouns of the same gender referring to distinct persons?What is the difference between “ubi” and “in quo” as relative adverbs?Why do some pronoun nominatives look like vocatives?

3

This question was inspired by a comment to an answer on this question:

How would you say “same thing” in Latin?

In which an answerer translated "Utinam idem sentires ac ipsa/ipse sentio!" as "If only you felt the same as I (fem/masc) feel!"

Thanks in advance.

pronomina personal-pronouns

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦

49.1k1271287

asked 4 hours ago

Sola GratiaSola Gratia

1362

New contributor

Sola Gratia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

3

This question was inspired by a comment to an answer on this question:

How would you say “same thing” in Latin?

In which an answerer translated "Utinam idem sentires ac ipsa/ipse sentio!" as "If only you felt the same as I (fem/masc) feel!"

Thanks in advance.

pronomina personal-pronouns

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦

49.1k1271287

asked 4 hours ago

Sola GratiaSola Gratia

1362

New contributor

Sola Gratia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

This question was inspired by a comment to an answer on this question:

How would you say “same thing” in Latin?

In which an answerer translated "Utinam idem sentires ac ipsa/ipse sentio!" as "If only you felt the same as I (fem/masc) feel!"

Thanks in advance.

pronomina personal-pronouns

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦

49.1k1271287

asked 4 hours ago

Sola GratiaSola Gratia

1362

New contributor

Sola Gratia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦

49.1k1271287

asked 4 hours ago

Sola GratiaSola Gratia

1362

New contributor

Sola Gratia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦

49.1k1271287

asked 4 hours ago

Sola GratiaSola Gratia

1362

New contributor

Sola Gratia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 3 hours ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦

49.1k1271287

edited 3 hours ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦

49.1k1271287

asked 4 hours ago

Sola GratiaSola Gratia

1362

New contributor

Sola Gratia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 4 hours ago

Sola GratiaSola Gratia

1362

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

3

The pronoun ipse is not a third person pronoun.
It can be used with the first or second person just as well.
The closest English word I can think of is "-self" from which one can form "myself", "yourself", "himself", and others.
(For clarity, I should add that ipse is not quite the same as "-self"; it is just the simplest one-word translation. Forms of se can also be translated as "-self", but in a very different way.)

Reference to first or second (or third!) person can be left implicit.
You can say ipse sentio ("I myself feel"), no need to say ego ipse sentio.

It is possible to use it together with ego or tu as well, and that gives more emphasis.
It also proves unambiguously that the pronoun can go together with first and second persons.
For a couple of examples, you can check uses of ego ipse and tu ipse in Cicero.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 4 hours ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta

49.1k1271287

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  That has to be the fastest answer in history (literally within seconds haha). I will mark yours as the answer as soon as it'll allow me (which is apparently 10 minutes from now) (Also, did you mean to write "unambiguously?")
  
  – Sola Gratia
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @SolaGratia I did, but I was in a Latin mode and went with in- instead of un-. Good catch!
  
  – Joonas Ilmavirta♦
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I suspected as much, haha. Thanks agian.
  
  – Sola Gratia
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

As Joonas said, ipse is an intensifier, not a pronoun in and of itself.

Caesar ipse hoc dixit.

Caesar himself said this!

The trick is, Latin leaves out pronouns all the time. So you'll sometimes see ipse standing on its own.

Ipse hoc aedificavi.

I built this myself!

Here, the ending of the verb is what supplies the "I" and "my-" parts.

Finally, a word of caution: ipse does not mean "-self" in the sense of "he's talking to himself". In English, the "intensive" pronoun and the "reflexive" pronoun look the same, but in Latin this isn't the case! So only use ipse when you're emphasizing something, not when you're saying that the subject and the object are the same.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

DraconisDraconis

18.2k22475

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I would actually say that ipse is a pronoun, but not a personal pronoun. But I guess that depends on what one means by a pronoun in a first place, and that's tangential to the question at hand. Anyway, a +1 for a good explanation!
  
  – Joonas Ilmavirta♦
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "644"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

Sola Gratia is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9440%2fis-ipsum-ipsa-ipse-a-third-person-pronoun-or-can-it-serve-other-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

The pronoun ipse is not a third person pronoun.
It can be used with the first or second person just as well.
The closest English word I can think of is "-self" from which one can form "myself", "yourself", "himself", and others.
(For clarity, I should add that ipse is not quite the same as "-self"; it is just the simplest one-word translation. Forms of se can also be translated as "-self", but in a very different way.)

Reference to first or second (or third!) person can be left implicit.
You can say ipse sentio ("I myself feel"), no need to say ego ipse sentio.

It is possible to use it together with ego or tu as well, and that gives more emphasis.
It also proves unambiguously that the pronoun can go together with first and second persons.
For a couple of examples, you can check uses of ego ipse and tu ipse in Cicero.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 4 hours ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta

49.1k1271287

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  That has to be the fastest answer in history (literally within seconds haha). I will mark yours as the answer as soon as it'll allow me (which is apparently 10 minutes from now) (Also, did you mean to write "unambiguously?")
  
  – Sola Gratia
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @SolaGratia I did, but I was in a Latin mode and went with in- instead of un-. Good catch!
  
  – Joonas Ilmavirta♦
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I suspected as much, haha. Thanks agian.
  
  – Sola Gratia
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

The pronoun ipse is not a third person pronoun.
It can be used with the first or second person just as well.
The closest English word I can think of is "-self" from which one can form "myself", "yourself", "himself", and others.
(For clarity, I should add that ipse is not quite the same as "-self"; it is just the simplest one-word translation. Forms of se can also be translated as "-self", but in a very different way.)

Reference to first or second (or third!) person can be left implicit.
You can say ipse sentio ("I myself feel"), no need to say ego ipse sentio.

It is possible to use it together with ego or tu as well, and that gives more emphasis.
It also proves unambiguously that the pronoun can go together with first and second persons.
For a couple of examples, you can check uses of ego ipse and tu ipse in Cicero.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 4 hours ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta

49.1k1271287

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  That has to be the fastest answer in history (literally within seconds haha). I will mark yours as the answer as soon as it'll allow me (which is apparently 10 minutes from now) (Also, did you mean to write "unambiguously?")
  
  – Sola Gratia
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @SolaGratia I did, but I was in a Latin mode and went with in- instead of un-. Good catch!
  
  – Joonas Ilmavirta♦
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I suspected as much, haha. Thanks agian.
  
  – Sola Gratia
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

The pronoun ipse is not a third person pronoun.
It can be used with the first or second person just as well.
The closest English word I can think of is "-self" from which one can form "myself", "yourself", "himself", and others.
(For clarity, I should add that ipse is not quite the same as "-self"; it is just the simplest one-word translation. Forms of se can also be translated as "-self", but in a very different way.)

Reference to first or second (or third!) person can be left implicit.
You can say ipse sentio ("I myself feel"), no need to say ego ipse sentio.

It is possible to use it together with ego or tu as well, and that gives more emphasis.
It also proves unambiguously that the pronoun can go together with first and second persons.
For a couple of examples, you can check uses of ego ipse and tu ipse in Cicero.

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 4 hours ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta

49.1k1271287

share|improve this answer

edited 1 hour ago

answered 4 hours ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta

49.1k1271287

answered 4 hours ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta

49.1k1271287

answered 4 hours ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta

49.1k1271287

2

As Joonas said, ipse is an intensifier, not a pronoun in and of itself.

Caesar ipse hoc dixit.

Caesar himself said this!

The trick is, Latin leaves out pronouns all the time. So you'll sometimes see ipse standing on its own.

Ipse hoc aedificavi.

I built this myself!

Here, the ending of the verb is what supplies the "I" and "my-" parts.

Finally, a word of caution: ipse does not mean "-self" in the sense of "he's talking to himself". In English, the "intensive" pronoun and the "reflexive" pronoun look the same, but in Latin this isn't the case! So only use ipse when you're emphasizing something, not when you're saying that the subject and the object are the same.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

DraconisDraconis

18.2k22475

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I would actually say that ipse is a pronoun, but not a personal pronoun. But I guess that depends on what one means by a pronoun in a first place, and that's tangential to the question at hand. Anyway, a +1 for a good explanation!
  
  – Joonas Ilmavirta♦
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

As Joonas said, ipse is an intensifier, not a pronoun in and of itself.

Caesar ipse hoc dixit.

Caesar himself said this!

The trick is, Latin leaves out pronouns all the time. So you'll sometimes see ipse standing on its own.

Ipse hoc aedificavi.

I built this myself!

Here, the ending of the verb is what supplies the "I" and "my-" parts.

Finally, a word of caution: ipse does not mean "-self" in the sense of "he's talking to himself". In English, the "intensive" pronoun and the "reflexive" pronoun look the same, but in Latin this isn't the case! So only use ipse when you're emphasizing something, not when you're saying that the subject and the object are the same.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

DraconisDraconis

18.2k22475

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I would actually say that ipse is a pronoun, but not a personal pronoun. But I guess that depends on what one means by a pronoun in a first place, and that's tangential to the question at hand. Anyway, a +1 for a good explanation!
  
  – Joonas Ilmavirta♦
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

As Joonas said, ipse is an intensifier, not a pronoun in and of itself.

Caesar ipse hoc dixit.

Caesar himself said this!

The trick is, Latin leaves out pronouns all the time. So you'll sometimes see ipse standing on its own.

Ipse hoc aedificavi.

I built this myself!

Here, the ending of the verb is what supplies the "I" and "my-" parts.

Finally, a word of caution: ipse does not mean "-self" in the sense of "he's talking to himself". In English, the "intensive" pronoun and the "reflexive" pronoun look the same, but in Latin this isn't the case! So only use ipse when you're emphasizing something, not when you're saying that the subject and the object are the same.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

DraconisDraconis

18.2k22475

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

DraconisDraconis

18.2k22475

answered 3 hours ago

DraconisDraconis

18.2k22475

answered 3 hours ago

DraconisDraconis

18.2k22475