PsExec slow to start a process The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In ...

How to determine omitted units in a publication

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Can the DM override racial traits?

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?

Make it rain characters

"is" operation returns false even though two objects have same id

Why doesn't a hydraulic lever violate conservation of energy?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time?

How to handle characters who are more educated than the author?

What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?

Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached

Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one geodesic.

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Presidential Pardon

My body leaves; my core can stay

Is there a way to generate uniformly distributed points on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers per point?

how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?

Why are PDP-7-style microprogrammed instructions out of vogue?

Visa regaring travelling European country



PsExec slow to start a process



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!Why is psExec hanging indefinitely and giving no error?Capturing output of remote process from sysinternal's psexecPSEXEC - PATH VARIABLE NOT FOUNDHow to use psexec in Windows XPPsExec AlternativeHow To use psexec command remotely?How to Block psexec?PsExec and xCmdPsExec will not work due to File and Print Sharing disabled in firewallIIS start remote commands - PsServices | PsExecHow can I troubleshoot simple psExec problems?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







0















PsExec (v2.11) can take up to a minute to invoke a process, either locally or remotely.



I'm using the following command line:



psexec.exe -u domainusername -p mypassword -accepteula -d -h \machinename C:pathtomyapp.exe


I have the firewall disabled on all machines.



What else can I look at?



UPDATE: I used procmon to highlight the delay:



enter image description here










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 10 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.






















    0















    PsExec (v2.11) can take up to a minute to invoke a process, either locally or remotely.



    I'm using the following command line:



    psexec.exe -u domainusername -p mypassword -accepteula -d -h \machinename C:pathtomyapp.exe


    I have the firewall disabled on all machines.



    What else can I look at?



    UPDATE: I used procmon to highlight the delay:



    enter image description here










    share|improve this question
















    bumped to the homepage by Community 10 mins ago


    This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.


















      0












      0








      0








      PsExec (v2.11) can take up to a minute to invoke a process, either locally or remotely.



      I'm using the following command line:



      psexec.exe -u domainusername -p mypassword -accepteula -d -h \machinename C:pathtomyapp.exe


      I have the firewall disabled on all machines.



      What else can I look at?



      UPDATE: I used procmon to highlight the delay:



      enter image description here










      share|improve this question
















      PsExec (v2.11) can take up to a minute to invoke a process, either locally or remotely.



      I'm using the following command line:



      psexec.exe -u domainusername -p mypassword -accepteula -d -h \machinename C:pathtomyapp.exe


      I have the firewall disabled on all machines.



      What else can I look at?



      UPDATE: I used procmon to highlight the delay:



      enter image description here







      pstools






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 2 '16 at 15:32







      Mark Richman

















      asked Mar 2 '16 at 1:33









      Mark RichmanMark Richman

      181314




      181314





      bumped to the homepage by Community 10 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







      bumped to the homepage by Community 10 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          The command indirectly open a user session under the specified username to run the process, thus it will be long, you can't do much for that problem.



          Only tip to make it a bit faster:




          • You can try with -s to run the process as a LOCAL SYSTEM.


          • Try with -e, so it does not load the user profile.







          share|improve this answer
























          • I just tried those, and it doesn't seem to have any effect. It's interesting because this slowness just started today. The IT guys swear nothing changed ;-) It used to start rather instantaneously.

            – Mark Richman
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:11











          • @MarkRichman Check in add/remove program, and verify if any update got installed :) Some nasty (with already know related problem) went live last month.

            – yagmoth555
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:30











          • Which update has the known issue?

            – Mark Richman
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:31











          • KB3134228 (technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms16-feb.aspx, support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3134228) Not wrote in the KB text, but on my side it broke a Citrix PVS's server (5.6SP3) to manage virtual machine active directory password.

            – yagmoth555
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:38






          • 1





            @MarkRichman anyhow, run a processmonitor and watch where is the timeout would be the next step

            – yagmoth555
            Mar 2 '16 at 3:02












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "2"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f760869%2fpsexec-slow-to-start-a-process%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          The command indirectly open a user session under the specified username to run the process, thus it will be long, you can't do much for that problem.



          Only tip to make it a bit faster:




          • You can try with -s to run the process as a LOCAL SYSTEM.


          • Try with -e, so it does not load the user profile.







          share|improve this answer
























          • I just tried those, and it doesn't seem to have any effect. It's interesting because this slowness just started today. The IT guys swear nothing changed ;-) It used to start rather instantaneously.

            – Mark Richman
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:11











          • @MarkRichman Check in add/remove program, and verify if any update got installed :) Some nasty (with already know related problem) went live last month.

            – yagmoth555
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:30











          • Which update has the known issue?

            – Mark Richman
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:31











          • KB3134228 (technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms16-feb.aspx, support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3134228) Not wrote in the KB text, but on my side it broke a Citrix PVS's server (5.6SP3) to manage virtual machine active directory password.

            – yagmoth555
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:38






          • 1





            @MarkRichman anyhow, run a processmonitor and watch where is the timeout would be the next step

            – yagmoth555
            Mar 2 '16 at 3:02
















          0














          The command indirectly open a user session under the specified username to run the process, thus it will be long, you can't do much for that problem.



          Only tip to make it a bit faster:




          • You can try with -s to run the process as a LOCAL SYSTEM.


          • Try with -e, so it does not load the user profile.







          share|improve this answer
























          • I just tried those, and it doesn't seem to have any effect. It's interesting because this slowness just started today. The IT guys swear nothing changed ;-) It used to start rather instantaneously.

            – Mark Richman
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:11











          • @MarkRichman Check in add/remove program, and verify if any update got installed :) Some nasty (with already know related problem) went live last month.

            – yagmoth555
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:30











          • Which update has the known issue?

            – Mark Richman
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:31











          • KB3134228 (technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms16-feb.aspx, support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3134228) Not wrote in the KB text, but on my side it broke a Citrix PVS's server (5.6SP3) to manage virtual machine active directory password.

            – yagmoth555
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:38






          • 1





            @MarkRichman anyhow, run a processmonitor and watch where is the timeout would be the next step

            – yagmoth555
            Mar 2 '16 at 3:02














          0












          0








          0







          The command indirectly open a user session under the specified username to run the process, thus it will be long, you can't do much for that problem.



          Only tip to make it a bit faster:




          • You can try with -s to run the process as a LOCAL SYSTEM.


          • Try with -e, so it does not load the user profile.







          share|improve this answer













          The command indirectly open a user session under the specified username to run the process, thus it will be long, you can't do much for that problem.



          Only tip to make it a bit faster:




          • You can try with -s to run the process as a LOCAL SYSTEM.


          • Try with -e, so it does not load the user profile.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 2 '16 at 2:01









          yagmoth555yagmoth555

          12.4k31842




          12.4k31842













          • I just tried those, and it doesn't seem to have any effect. It's interesting because this slowness just started today. The IT guys swear nothing changed ;-) It used to start rather instantaneously.

            – Mark Richman
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:11











          • @MarkRichman Check in add/remove program, and verify if any update got installed :) Some nasty (with already know related problem) went live last month.

            – yagmoth555
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:30











          • Which update has the known issue?

            – Mark Richman
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:31











          • KB3134228 (technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms16-feb.aspx, support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3134228) Not wrote in the KB text, but on my side it broke a Citrix PVS's server (5.6SP3) to manage virtual machine active directory password.

            – yagmoth555
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:38






          • 1





            @MarkRichman anyhow, run a processmonitor and watch where is the timeout would be the next step

            – yagmoth555
            Mar 2 '16 at 3:02



















          • I just tried those, and it doesn't seem to have any effect. It's interesting because this slowness just started today. The IT guys swear nothing changed ;-) It used to start rather instantaneously.

            – Mark Richman
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:11











          • @MarkRichman Check in add/remove program, and verify if any update got installed :) Some nasty (with already know related problem) went live last month.

            – yagmoth555
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:30











          • Which update has the known issue?

            – Mark Richman
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:31











          • KB3134228 (technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms16-feb.aspx, support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3134228) Not wrote in the KB text, but on my side it broke a Citrix PVS's server (5.6SP3) to manage virtual machine active directory password.

            – yagmoth555
            Mar 2 '16 at 2:38






          • 1





            @MarkRichman anyhow, run a processmonitor and watch where is the timeout would be the next step

            – yagmoth555
            Mar 2 '16 at 3:02

















          I just tried those, and it doesn't seem to have any effect. It's interesting because this slowness just started today. The IT guys swear nothing changed ;-) It used to start rather instantaneously.

          – Mark Richman
          Mar 2 '16 at 2:11





          I just tried those, and it doesn't seem to have any effect. It's interesting because this slowness just started today. The IT guys swear nothing changed ;-) It used to start rather instantaneously.

          – Mark Richman
          Mar 2 '16 at 2:11













          @MarkRichman Check in add/remove program, and verify if any update got installed :) Some nasty (with already know related problem) went live last month.

          – yagmoth555
          Mar 2 '16 at 2:30





          @MarkRichman Check in add/remove program, and verify if any update got installed :) Some nasty (with already know related problem) went live last month.

          – yagmoth555
          Mar 2 '16 at 2:30













          Which update has the known issue?

          – Mark Richman
          Mar 2 '16 at 2:31





          Which update has the known issue?

          – Mark Richman
          Mar 2 '16 at 2:31













          KB3134228 (technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms16-feb.aspx, support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3134228) Not wrote in the KB text, but on my side it broke a Citrix PVS's server (5.6SP3) to manage virtual machine active directory password.

          – yagmoth555
          Mar 2 '16 at 2:38





          KB3134228 (technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms16-feb.aspx, support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3134228) Not wrote in the KB text, but on my side it broke a Citrix PVS's server (5.6SP3) to manage virtual machine active directory password.

          – yagmoth555
          Mar 2 '16 at 2:38




          1




          1





          @MarkRichman anyhow, run a processmonitor and watch where is the timeout would be the next step

          – yagmoth555
          Mar 2 '16 at 3:02





          @MarkRichman anyhow, run a processmonitor and watch where is the timeout would be the next step

          – yagmoth555
          Mar 2 '16 at 3:02


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f760869%2fpsexec-slow-to-start-a-process%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          As a Security Precaution, the user account has been locked The Next CEO of Stack OverflowMS...

          Список ссавців Італії Природоохоронні статуси | Список |...

          Українські прізвища Зміст Історичні відомості |...