Ryfujk

What's the best way to handle refactoring a big file?

Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons

Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)

How does the mv command work with external drives?

Bold, vivid family

How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?

Indicator light circuit

Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?

In excess I'm lethal

What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"

How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?

How do I transpose the 1st and -1th levels of an arbitrarily nested array?

Which tube will fit a -(700 x 25c) wheel?

Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?

Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

Is "for causing autism in X" grammatical?

Is micro rebar a better way to reinforce concrete than rebar?

What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?

Interfacing a button to MCU (and PC) with 50m long cable

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

What is ( CFMCC ) on ILS approach chart?

Why do airplanes bank sharply to the right after air-to-air refueling?

What benefits would be gained by using human laborers instead of drones in deep sea mining?

Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand?

2

1

I was reading through this question Can a Muggle do anything with a wand? and Valorum’s answer said this:

JKR addressed this point in an interview in 2006;

"I been asked what would happen if a Muggle picked up a magic wand in my world. And the answer would probably be something accidental... possibly quite violent. Because a wand, in my world, is merely a vehicle — a vessel for what lies inside the person."

So then what if you’re someone who is completely good and has no "violence" inside of you, would you then be able to use a wand?

harry-potter

share|improve this question

edited 1 hour ago

TheLethalCarrot

49.2k19267311

asked 1 hour ago

it makes u thinkit makes u think

191

New contributor

it makes u think is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  If I'm reading the quote correctly, no. Being pure of heart would eliminate the "possibly quite violent" part, but not the "probably something accidental" part.
  
  – F1Krazy
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I think a tablet with a fancy, expensive drawing app might be a good analogy. Anyone can scribble on the screen, but it takes talent and practice to paint something people (beyond the immediate family) would consider art.
  
  – Gaultheria
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

1

I was reading through this question Can a Muggle do anything with a wand? and Valorum’s answer said this:

JKR addressed this point in an interview in 2006;

"I been asked what would happen if a Muggle picked up a magic wand in my world. And the answer would probably be something accidental... possibly quite violent. Because a wand, in my world, is merely a vehicle — a vessel for what lies inside the person."

So then what if you’re someone who is completely good and has no "violence" inside of you, would you then be able to use a wand?

harry-potter

share|improve this question

edited 1 hour ago

TheLethalCarrot

49.2k19267311

asked 1 hour ago

it makes u thinkit makes u think

191

New contributor

it makes u think is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  If I'm reading the quote correctly, no. Being pure of heart would eliminate the "possibly quite violent" part, but not the "probably something accidental" part.
  
  – F1Krazy
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I think a tablet with a fancy, expensive drawing app might be a good analogy. Anyone can scribble on the screen, but it takes talent and practice to paint something people (beyond the immediate family) would consider art.
  
  – Gaultheria
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I was reading through this question Can a Muggle do anything with a wand? and Valorum’s answer said this:

JKR addressed this point in an interview in 2006;

"I been asked what would happen if a Muggle picked up a magic wand in my world. And the answer would probably be something accidental... possibly quite violent. Because a wand, in my world, is merely a vehicle — a vessel for what lies inside the person."

So then what if you’re someone who is completely good and has no "violence" inside of you, would you then be able to use a wand?

harry-potter

share|improve this question

edited 1 hour ago

TheLethalCarrot

49.2k19267311

asked 1 hour ago

it makes u thinkit makes u think

191

New contributor

it makes u think is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 1 hour ago

TheLethalCarrot

49.2k19267311

asked 1 hour ago

it makes u thinkit makes u think

191

New contributor

it makes u think is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 1 hour ago

TheLethalCarrot

49.2k19267311

asked 1 hour ago

it makes u thinkit makes u think

191

New contributor

it makes u think is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 1 hour ago

TheLethalCarrot

49.2k19267311

edited 1 hour ago

TheLethalCarrot

49.2k19267311

asked 1 hour ago

it makes u thinkit makes u think

191

New contributor

it makes u think is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 1 hour ago

it makes u thinkit makes u think

191

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

5

No, you've misunderstood the quote.

JKR isn't saying that the result would be violent because violence is what lies inside a Muggle (though it does sound like something the Malfoys might come up with) but that the result of a Muggle using a wand would be uncontrolled because the Muggle lacks the ability to control magic - that's the power that lies inside a wizard, and which the wand is a vessel for.

By way of analogy, imagine a three-year-old driving a car. The outcome would probably be unintentional, and possibly quite violent, but that's not because it is in the nature of children to be violent but because they lack the ability to control the vehicle. Their character doesn't matter, only their ability.

share|improve this answer

answered 47 mins ago

Harry JohnstonHarry Johnston

13.6k23267

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

it makes u think is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208175%2fwould-a-completely-good-muggle-be-able-to-use-a-wand%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

5

No, you've misunderstood the quote.

JKR isn't saying that the result would be violent because violence is what lies inside a Muggle (though it does sound like something the Malfoys might come up with) but that the result of a Muggle using a wand would be uncontrolled because the Muggle lacks the ability to control magic - that's the power that lies inside a wizard, and which the wand is a vessel for.

By way of analogy, imagine a three-year-old driving a car. The outcome would probably be unintentional, and possibly quite violent, but that's not because it is in the nature of children to be violent but because they lack the ability to control the vehicle. Their character doesn't matter, only their ability.

share|improve this answer

answered 47 mins ago

Harry JohnstonHarry Johnston

13.6k23267

add a comment | 

5

No, you've misunderstood the quote.

JKR isn't saying that the result would be violent because violence is what lies inside a Muggle (though it does sound like something the Malfoys might come up with) but that the result of a Muggle using a wand would be uncontrolled because the Muggle lacks the ability to control magic - that's the power that lies inside a wizard, and which the wand is a vessel for.

By way of analogy, imagine a three-year-old driving a car. The outcome would probably be unintentional, and possibly quite violent, but that's not because it is in the nature of children to be violent but because they lack the ability to control the vehicle. Their character doesn't matter, only their ability.

share|improve this answer

answered 47 mins ago

Harry JohnstonHarry Johnston

13.6k23267

add a comment | 

No, you've misunderstood the quote.

JKR isn't saying that the result would be violent because violence is what lies inside a Muggle (though it does sound like something the Malfoys might come up with) but that the result of a Muggle using a wand would be uncontrolled because the Muggle lacks the ability to control magic - that's the power that lies inside a wizard, and which the wand is a vessel for.

By way of analogy, imagine a three-year-old driving a car. The outcome would probably be unintentional, and possibly quite violent, but that's not because it is in the nature of children to be violent but because they lack the ability to control the vehicle. Their character doesn't matter, only their ability.

share|improve this answer

answered 47 mins ago

Harry JohnstonHarry Johnston

13.6k23267

share|improve this answer

answered 47 mins ago

Harry JohnstonHarry Johnston

13.6k23267

answered 47 mins ago

Harry JohnstonHarry Johnston

13.6k23267

answered 47 mins ago

Harry JohnstonHarry Johnston

13.6k23267