The need of reserving one's ability in job interviewsHow do I establish the body language baseline in an...
Real life puzzle: Unknown alphabet or shorthand
If a druid in Wild Shape swallows a creature whole, then turns back to her normal form, what happens?
Wrap all numerics in JSON with quotes
Infrastructure damage from sudden thickening of water
Are small insurances worth it
Is there a German word for “analytics”?
Canadian citizen, on US no-fly list. What can I do in order to be allowed on flights which go through US airspace?
Can we carry rice to Japan?
How can I be pwned if I'm not registered on that site?
Whom do I have to contact for a ticket refund in case of denied boarding (in the EU)?
What are these green text/line displays shown during the livestream of Crew Dragon's approach to dock with the ISS?
Accessing something inside the object when you don't know the key
Equivalent to "source" in OpenBSD?
Linear regression when Y is bounded and discrete
What if I store 10TB on azure servers and then keep the vm powered off?
How would we write a misogynistic character without offending people?
Did 5.25" floppies undergo a change in magnetic coating?
How do you say "powers of ten"?
What does 'open position for bachelor project' actually mean?
Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?
What to do when being responsible for data protection in your lab, yet advice is ignored?
What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?
Six real numbers so that product of any five is the sixth one
It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)
The need of reserving one's ability in job interviews
How do I establish the body language baseline in an interview?Handling multiple long-distance job interviews in the same areaBeing highly capable and motivated vs 'Is going to stick around'Interviewing a potential employee, asking about commuteShould I be honest about why I quit a job I really liked?Is it typical to be interviewed with another candidate, asked personal questions, and required to debate in a language that won't be used at work?Dealing with anxiety during technical/coding interviews as someone with ADD?Job interviews while working new jobWhy is it 'expected' that software developers work on their own projects in their spare time?Juggling Job Offers and Interviews
When interviewing with a company where all the interviewers have lower educational backgrounds from lower ranking schools than the interviewee, should the interviewee appear modest, weaker and reserve (not show off) part of his/her repertoire? The reason behind is that employers might prefer hiring people less or as smart people as they are, or those who don't look too different from themselves.
interviewing job-search
New contributor
add a comment |
When interviewing with a company where all the interviewers have lower educational backgrounds from lower ranking schools than the interviewee, should the interviewee appear modest, weaker and reserve (not show off) part of his/her repertoire? The reason behind is that employers might prefer hiring people less or as smart people as they are, or those who don't look too different from themselves.
interviewing job-search
New contributor
1
Can you explain why you would want to work for a company that's hiring less capable workers and then performing under your full ability? That seems like a loss for all involved.
– Erik
4 hours ago
the firm is good and the employers' qualifications r decent, not bad. but there happens to b 1 applicant that has a far better edu background
– feynman
4 hours ago
2
You seem to assume that lesser educational background necessarily implies less smart. I got my PhD at age 60, after an industry career.. I don't think I magically became smarter then.
– Patricia Shanahan
30 mins ago
add a comment |
When interviewing with a company where all the interviewers have lower educational backgrounds from lower ranking schools than the interviewee, should the interviewee appear modest, weaker and reserve (not show off) part of his/her repertoire? The reason behind is that employers might prefer hiring people less or as smart people as they are, or those who don't look too different from themselves.
interviewing job-search
New contributor
When interviewing with a company where all the interviewers have lower educational backgrounds from lower ranking schools than the interviewee, should the interviewee appear modest, weaker and reserve (not show off) part of his/her repertoire? The reason behind is that employers might prefer hiring people less or as smart people as they are, or those who don't look too different from themselves.
interviewing job-search
interviewing job-search
New contributor
New contributor
edited 18 mins ago
Sourav Ghosh
3,68811531
3,68811531
New contributor
asked 5 hours ago
feynmanfeynman
1242
1242
New contributor
New contributor
1
Can you explain why you would want to work for a company that's hiring less capable workers and then performing under your full ability? That seems like a loss for all involved.
– Erik
4 hours ago
the firm is good and the employers' qualifications r decent, not bad. but there happens to b 1 applicant that has a far better edu background
– feynman
4 hours ago
2
You seem to assume that lesser educational background necessarily implies less smart. I got my PhD at age 60, after an industry career.. I don't think I magically became smarter then.
– Patricia Shanahan
30 mins ago
add a comment |
1
Can you explain why you would want to work for a company that's hiring less capable workers and then performing under your full ability? That seems like a loss for all involved.
– Erik
4 hours ago
the firm is good and the employers' qualifications r decent, not bad. but there happens to b 1 applicant that has a far better edu background
– feynman
4 hours ago
2
You seem to assume that lesser educational background necessarily implies less smart. I got my PhD at age 60, after an industry career.. I don't think I magically became smarter then.
– Patricia Shanahan
30 mins ago
1
1
Can you explain why you would want to work for a company that's hiring less capable workers and then performing under your full ability? That seems like a loss for all involved.
– Erik
4 hours ago
Can you explain why you would want to work for a company that's hiring less capable workers and then performing under your full ability? That seems like a loss for all involved.
– Erik
4 hours ago
the firm is good and the employers' qualifications r decent, not bad. but there happens to b 1 applicant that has a far better edu background
– feynman
4 hours ago
the firm is good and the employers' qualifications r decent, not bad. but there happens to b 1 applicant that has a far better edu background
– feynman
4 hours ago
2
2
You seem to assume that lesser educational background necessarily implies less smart. I got my PhD at age 60, after an industry career.. I don't think I magically became smarter then.
– Patricia Shanahan
30 mins ago
You seem to assume that lesser educational background necessarily implies less smart. I got my PhD at age 60, after an industry career.. I don't think I magically became smarter then.
– Patricia Shanahan
30 mins ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
When interviewing with a company where all the interviewers have lower educational backgrounds from lower ranking schools than the interviewee,
Wait, hang on. While this is a common assumption that reputed schools produce good grades, it does not necessarily imply that the second or third-tier schools are of lower grade. Moreover, it's not only the formal education that matters, there are many proficient engineers you'll meet who are self-taught (up to a very great extent). Some may not have a prestigious alma mater, but they may certainly have brilliant on-job work experience and learning.
The reason behind is that employers might prefer hiring people less or as smart people as they are.
That's almost never true, rather quite the opposite. If I'm hiring someone, I'd expect a smart and capable person, not a "weaker and reserve" one.
To add, don't judge your interviewer by their background - in an interview, always give your best shot.
That said, when you say "all the interviewers have lower educational backgrounds...." - maybe you should be worried about the organization and their work, not the individuals.
add a comment |
Here's something you probably haven't realized yet:
1 year in the workforce is equivalent to about 3 years in college. You divide your attention in college. You are given problems that the answers to are already known (unless you're pursuing doctoral / PHD degrees), and there is far less "on the line" than in a real job.
The one advantage "good schools" have is a lifelong network of other graduates that you share a connection with.
That person who's been working 5 years from "Average Joe Tech" knows as much, if not more than any high-end bachelor's degree holder, and he knows more about what is needed in that situation than ANY applicant could possible glean from a job description.
So you go in there with your best shot, but you go in there understanding that they need you to fit the job, and they're not going to make the job fit you.
I've hired good and bad graduates with "top school degrees," but I've also hired a fair number of people with no or unrelated degrees who turned into phenomenal individual contributors.
add a comment |
The candidate should behave reasonably, regardless of the interviewers.
Think about this: how should Einstein behave during a job interview? Of course, almost everybody on Earth would look stupid by comparison, regardless of University degrees.
By "reasonably" I mean:
- be polite and civilized;
- answer the answers as truthfully as possible, while selling yourself in the best way possible;
- do not boast about yourself;
- let the interviewers deal with what / who they want to hire for the job they have to offer.
good, but who knows how einstein behaved?
– feynman
4 hours ago
@feynman anyone who knew him? He isn't some legendary being, there are still people alive today who met him. (Granted, the number is dwindling rapidly, but still. He died only 65 years ago.)
– Erik
4 hours ago
It is not the point how he actually behaved - he probably did not get interviewed by the companies, but companies were interview by him. The example is related to OP's statement "interviewers have lower educational backgrounds" - in comparison with Einstein, even some real geniuses had lower educational backgrounds.
– virolino
3 hours ago
add a comment |
While you don't want to appear arrogant or a "show-off" there's no reason to appear weaker or less intelligent/capable then you actually are.
I always want to hire the best person for the job, regardless of their relative intelligence vis a vis myself, in fact hiring people smarter than yourself is what we call "good management".
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: false,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
feynman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f130842%2fthe-need-of-reserving-ones-ability-in-job-interviews%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(function () {
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
var showEditor = function() {
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
};
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True') {
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup({
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup) {
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
}
})
} else{
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
showEditor();
}
}
});
});
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
When interviewing with a company where all the interviewers have lower educational backgrounds from lower ranking schools than the interviewee,
Wait, hang on. While this is a common assumption that reputed schools produce good grades, it does not necessarily imply that the second or third-tier schools are of lower grade. Moreover, it's not only the formal education that matters, there are many proficient engineers you'll meet who are self-taught (up to a very great extent). Some may not have a prestigious alma mater, but they may certainly have brilliant on-job work experience and learning.
The reason behind is that employers might prefer hiring people less or as smart people as they are.
That's almost never true, rather quite the opposite. If I'm hiring someone, I'd expect a smart and capable person, not a "weaker and reserve" one.
To add, don't judge your interviewer by their background - in an interview, always give your best shot.
That said, when you say "all the interviewers have lower educational backgrounds...." - maybe you should be worried about the organization and their work, not the individuals.
add a comment |
When interviewing with a company where all the interviewers have lower educational backgrounds from lower ranking schools than the interviewee,
Wait, hang on. While this is a common assumption that reputed schools produce good grades, it does not necessarily imply that the second or third-tier schools are of lower grade. Moreover, it's not only the formal education that matters, there are many proficient engineers you'll meet who are self-taught (up to a very great extent). Some may not have a prestigious alma mater, but they may certainly have brilliant on-job work experience and learning.
The reason behind is that employers might prefer hiring people less or as smart people as they are.
That's almost never true, rather quite the opposite. If I'm hiring someone, I'd expect a smart and capable person, not a "weaker and reserve" one.
To add, don't judge your interviewer by their background - in an interview, always give your best shot.
That said, when you say "all the interviewers have lower educational backgrounds...." - maybe you should be worried about the organization and their work, not the individuals.
add a comment |
When interviewing with a company where all the interviewers have lower educational backgrounds from lower ranking schools than the interviewee,
Wait, hang on. While this is a common assumption that reputed schools produce good grades, it does not necessarily imply that the second or third-tier schools are of lower grade. Moreover, it's not only the formal education that matters, there are many proficient engineers you'll meet who are self-taught (up to a very great extent). Some may not have a prestigious alma mater, but they may certainly have brilliant on-job work experience and learning.
The reason behind is that employers might prefer hiring people less or as smart people as they are.
That's almost never true, rather quite the opposite. If I'm hiring someone, I'd expect a smart and capable person, not a "weaker and reserve" one.
To add, don't judge your interviewer by their background - in an interview, always give your best shot.
That said, when you say "all the interviewers have lower educational backgrounds...." - maybe you should be worried about the organization and their work, not the individuals.
When interviewing with a company where all the interviewers have lower educational backgrounds from lower ranking schools than the interviewee,
Wait, hang on. While this is a common assumption that reputed schools produce good grades, it does not necessarily imply that the second or third-tier schools are of lower grade. Moreover, it's not only the formal education that matters, there are many proficient engineers you'll meet who are self-taught (up to a very great extent). Some may not have a prestigious alma mater, but they may certainly have brilliant on-job work experience and learning.
The reason behind is that employers might prefer hiring people less or as smart people as they are.
That's almost never true, rather quite the opposite. If I'm hiring someone, I'd expect a smart and capable person, not a "weaker and reserve" one.
To add, don't judge your interviewer by their background - in an interview, always give your best shot.
That said, when you say "all the interviewers have lower educational backgrounds...." - maybe you should be worried about the organization and their work, not the individuals.
answered 5 hours ago
Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh
3,68811531
3,68811531
add a comment |
add a comment |
Here's something you probably haven't realized yet:
1 year in the workforce is equivalent to about 3 years in college. You divide your attention in college. You are given problems that the answers to are already known (unless you're pursuing doctoral / PHD degrees), and there is far less "on the line" than in a real job.
The one advantage "good schools" have is a lifelong network of other graduates that you share a connection with.
That person who's been working 5 years from "Average Joe Tech" knows as much, if not more than any high-end bachelor's degree holder, and he knows more about what is needed in that situation than ANY applicant could possible glean from a job description.
So you go in there with your best shot, but you go in there understanding that they need you to fit the job, and they're not going to make the job fit you.
I've hired good and bad graduates with "top school degrees," but I've also hired a fair number of people with no or unrelated degrees who turned into phenomenal individual contributors.
add a comment |
Here's something you probably haven't realized yet:
1 year in the workforce is equivalent to about 3 years in college. You divide your attention in college. You are given problems that the answers to are already known (unless you're pursuing doctoral / PHD degrees), and there is far less "on the line" than in a real job.
The one advantage "good schools" have is a lifelong network of other graduates that you share a connection with.
That person who's been working 5 years from "Average Joe Tech" knows as much, if not more than any high-end bachelor's degree holder, and he knows more about what is needed in that situation than ANY applicant could possible glean from a job description.
So you go in there with your best shot, but you go in there understanding that they need you to fit the job, and they're not going to make the job fit you.
I've hired good and bad graduates with "top school degrees," but I've also hired a fair number of people with no or unrelated degrees who turned into phenomenal individual contributors.
add a comment |
Here's something you probably haven't realized yet:
1 year in the workforce is equivalent to about 3 years in college. You divide your attention in college. You are given problems that the answers to are already known (unless you're pursuing doctoral / PHD degrees), and there is far less "on the line" than in a real job.
The one advantage "good schools" have is a lifelong network of other graduates that you share a connection with.
That person who's been working 5 years from "Average Joe Tech" knows as much, if not more than any high-end bachelor's degree holder, and he knows more about what is needed in that situation than ANY applicant could possible glean from a job description.
So you go in there with your best shot, but you go in there understanding that they need you to fit the job, and they're not going to make the job fit you.
I've hired good and bad graduates with "top school degrees," but I've also hired a fair number of people with no or unrelated degrees who turned into phenomenal individual contributors.
Here's something you probably haven't realized yet:
1 year in the workforce is equivalent to about 3 years in college. You divide your attention in college. You are given problems that the answers to are already known (unless you're pursuing doctoral / PHD degrees), and there is far less "on the line" than in a real job.
The one advantage "good schools" have is a lifelong network of other graduates that you share a connection with.
That person who's been working 5 years from "Average Joe Tech" knows as much, if not more than any high-end bachelor's degree holder, and he knows more about what is needed in that situation than ANY applicant could possible glean from a job description.
So you go in there with your best shot, but you go in there understanding that they need you to fit the job, and they're not going to make the job fit you.
I've hired good and bad graduates with "top school degrees," but I've also hired a fair number of people with no or unrelated degrees who turned into phenomenal individual contributors.
answered 4 hours ago
Wesley LongWesley Long
50k17108181
50k17108181
add a comment |
add a comment |
The candidate should behave reasonably, regardless of the interviewers.
Think about this: how should Einstein behave during a job interview? Of course, almost everybody on Earth would look stupid by comparison, regardless of University degrees.
By "reasonably" I mean:
- be polite and civilized;
- answer the answers as truthfully as possible, while selling yourself in the best way possible;
- do not boast about yourself;
- let the interviewers deal with what / who they want to hire for the job they have to offer.
good, but who knows how einstein behaved?
– feynman
4 hours ago
@feynman anyone who knew him? He isn't some legendary being, there are still people alive today who met him. (Granted, the number is dwindling rapidly, but still. He died only 65 years ago.)
– Erik
4 hours ago
It is not the point how he actually behaved - he probably did not get interviewed by the companies, but companies were interview by him. The example is related to OP's statement "interviewers have lower educational backgrounds" - in comparison with Einstein, even some real geniuses had lower educational backgrounds.
– virolino
3 hours ago
add a comment |
The candidate should behave reasonably, regardless of the interviewers.
Think about this: how should Einstein behave during a job interview? Of course, almost everybody on Earth would look stupid by comparison, regardless of University degrees.
By "reasonably" I mean:
- be polite and civilized;
- answer the answers as truthfully as possible, while selling yourself in the best way possible;
- do not boast about yourself;
- let the interviewers deal with what / who they want to hire for the job they have to offer.
good, but who knows how einstein behaved?
– feynman
4 hours ago
@feynman anyone who knew him? He isn't some legendary being, there are still people alive today who met him. (Granted, the number is dwindling rapidly, but still. He died only 65 years ago.)
– Erik
4 hours ago
It is not the point how he actually behaved - he probably did not get interviewed by the companies, but companies were interview by him. The example is related to OP's statement "interviewers have lower educational backgrounds" - in comparison with Einstein, even some real geniuses had lower educational backgrounds.
– virolino
3 hours ago
add a comment |
The candidate should behave reasonably, regardless of the interviewers.
Think about this: how should Einstein behave during a job interview? Of course, almost everybody on Earth would look stupid by comparison, regardless of University degrees.
By "reasonably" I mean:
- be polite and civilized;
- answer the answers as truthfully as possible, while selling yourself in the best way possible;
- do not boast about yourself;
- let the interviewers deal with what / who they want to hire for the job they have to offer.
The candidate should behave reasonably, regardless of the interviewers.
Think about this: how should Einstein behave during a job interview? Of course, almost everybody on Earth would look stupid by comparison, regardless of University degrees.
By "reasonably" I mean:
- be polite and civilized;
- answer the answers as truthfully as possible, while selling yourself in the best way possible;
- do not boast about yourself;
- let the interviewers deal with what / who they want to hire for the job they have to offer.
answered 4 hours ago
virolinovirolino
2,168119
2,168119
good, but who knows how einstein behaved?
– feynman
4 hours ago
@feynman anyone who knew him? He isn't some legendary being, there are still people alive today who met him. (Granted, the number is dwindling rapidly, but still. He died only 65 years ago.)
– Erik
4 hours ago
It is not the point how he actually behaved - he probably did not get interviewed by the companies, but companies were interview by him. The example is related to OP's statement "interviewers have lower educational backgrounds" - in comparison with Einstein, even some real geniuses had lower educational backgrounds.
– virolino
3 hours ago
add a comment |
good, but who knows how einstein behaved?
– feynman
4 hours ago
@feynman anyone who knew him? He isn't some legendary being, there are still people alive today who met him. (Granted, the number is dwindling rapidly, but still. He died only 65 years ago.)
– Erik
4 hours ago
It is not the point how he actually behaved - he probably did not get interviewed by the companies, but companies were interview by him. The example is related to OP's statement "interviewers have lower educational backgrounds" - in comparison with Einstein, even some real geniuses had lower educational backgrounds.
– virolino
3 hours ago
good, but who knows how einstein behaved?
– feynman
4 hours ago
good, but who knows how einstein behaved?
– feynman
4 hours ago
@feynman anyone who knew him? He isn't some legendary being, there are still people alive today who met him. (Granted, the number is dwindling rapidly, but still. He died only 65 years ago.)
– Erik
4 hours ago
@feynman anyone who knew him? He isn't some legendary being, there are still people alive today who met him. (Granted, the number is dwindling rapidly, but still. He died only 65 years ago.)
– Erik
4 hours ago
It is not the point how he actually behaved - he probably did not get interviewed by the companies, but companies were interview by him. The example is related to OP's statement "interviewers have lower educational backgrounds" - in comparison with Einstein, even some real geniuses had lower educational backgrounds.
– virolino
3 hours ago
It is not the point how he actually behaved - he probably did not get interviewed by the companies, but companies were interview by him. The example is related to OP's statement "interviewers have lower educational backgrounds" - in comparison with Einstein, even some real geniuses had lower educational backgrounds.
– virolino
3 hours ago
add a comment |
While you don't want to appear arrogant or a "show-off" there's no reason to appear weaker or less intelligent/capable then you actually are.
I always want to hire the best person for the job, regardless of their relative intelligence vis a vis myself, in fact hiring people smarter than yourself is what we call "good management".
add a comment |
While you don't want to appear arrogant or a "show-off" there's no reason to appear weaker or less intelligent/capable then you actually are.
I always want to hire the best person for the job, regardless of their relative intelligence vis a vis myself, in fact hiring people smarter than yourself is what we call "good management".
add a comment |
While you don't want to appear arrogant or a "show-off" there's no reason to appear weaker or less intelligent/capable then you actually are.
I always want to hire the best person for the job, regardless of their relative intelligence vis a vis myself, in fact hiring people smarter than yourself is what we call "good management".
While you don't want to appear arrogant or a "show-off" there's no reason to appear weaker or less intelligent/capable then you actually are.
I always want to hire the best person for the job, regardless of their relative intelligence vis a vis myself, in fact hiring people smarter than yourself is what we call "good management".
answered 2 hours ago
motosubatsumotosubatsu
49.7k27133194
49.7k27133194
add a comment |
add a comment |
feynman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
feynman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
feynman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
feynman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f130842%2fthe-need-of-reserving-ones-ability-in-job-interviews%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Can you explain why you would want to work for a company that's hiring less capable workers and then performing under your full ability? That seems like a loss for all involved.
– Erik
4 hours ago
the firm is good and the employers' qualifications r decent, not bad. but there happens to b 1 applicant that has a far better edu background
– feynman
4 hours ago
2
You seem to assume that lesser educational background necessarily implies less smart. I got my PhD at age 60, after an industry career.. I don't think I magically became smarter then.
– Patricia Shanahan
30 mins ago