fontspec breaks capital greek letters in DeclareMathOperatorWedge Power symbolReplacing greek glyphs in math...
The change directory (cd) command is not working with a USB drive
It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)
How to avoid being sexist when trying to employ someone to function in a very sexist environment?
What is the difference between throw e and throw new Exception(e)?
What am I? I am in theaters and computer programs
What does 'Linear regularities among words' mean?
Make me a metasequence
g++ and clang++ different behaviour with recursive initialization of a static member
How to add multiple differently colored borders around a node?
POVM three-qubit circuit for symmetric quantum states
Linear regression when Y is bounded and discrete
Book where the good guy lives backwards through time and the bad guy lives forward
What is the wife of a henpecked husband called?
When does inspiration across artforms become plagiarism
Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?
What do the pedals on grand pianos do?
CBP Reminds Travelers to Allow 72 Hours for ESTA. Why?
What's the purpose of these copper coils with resistors inside them in A Yamaha RX-V396RDS amplifier?
What is the difference between ashamed and shamed?
What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?
Hacker Rank: Array left rotation
What are these green text/line displays shown during the livestream of Crew Dragon's approach to dock with the ISS?
How to approximate rolls for potions of healing using only d6's?
What prevents the construction of a CPU with all necessary memory represented in registers?
fontspec breaks capital greek letters in DeclareMathOperator
Wedge Power symbolReplacing greek glyphs in math modeunicode-math breaks DeclareMathOperatorHow can I write curly capital Greek lettersProblem With Capital Greek Letterssetmainfont breaks DeclareMathOperatoraccent on capital Greek lettersDefine command for variable and use of capital Greek lettersDeclareMathOperator with capital Greek letterProblem with bold font of capital greek lettersnon-italic capital greek letters
Using fontspec
together with amsmath
breaks the use of capital greek letters in DeclareMathOperator
. Instead, the greek letter just is omitted.
Here is a minimal working example:
%! TEX program = xelatex
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{exterior}{Lambda}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
exterior^k V \
Lambda^k V
end{align*}
end{document}
This is the output:
Removing usepackage{fontspec}
makes the Lambda appear.
Funnily enough, if one also adds unicode-math
in the mix, i.e.
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{unicode-math}
usepackage{amsmath}
it works. But unicode-math
recommends to load it after amsmath
, so it can override commands. Though this breaks it again, which is really confusing to me.
Is there a sensible way to use fontspec
and amsmath
together? Did I miss something?
math-mode xetex amsmath fontspec greek
add a comment |
Using fontspec
together with amsmath
breaks the use of capital greek letters in DeclareMathOperator
. Instead, the greek letter just is omitted.
Here is a minimal working example:
%! TEX program = xelatex
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{exterior}{Lambda}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
exterior^k V \
Lambda^k V
end{align*}
end{document}
This is the output:
Removing usepackage{fontspec}
makes the Lambda appear.
Funnily enough, if one also adds unicode-math
in the mix, i.e.
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{unicode-math}
usepackage{amsmath}
it works. But unicode-math
recommends to load it after amsmath
, so it can override commands. Though this breaks it again, which is really confusing to me.
Is there a sensible way to use fontspec
and amsmath
together? Did I miss something?
math-mode xetex amsmath fontspec greek
Alternatively, you could typeset the operator using a properly changed variant ofwedge
as shown here. (I guess that the convention of usingLambda
for exterior product space powers is due to laziness, not semactics... usingwedge
seems more consistent to me.)
– phg
2 hours ago
Yeah I actually came from this. Though mostly the symbol is too big for my taste (e.g.bigwedge
), or does not scale in subscripts (e.g. the solution usingmbox
). I also do not understand the more involved solutions, and am not particularly keen to add those.
– red_trumpet
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Using fontspec
together with amsmath
breaks the use of capital greek letters in DeclareMathOperator
. Instead, the greek letter just is omitted.
Here is a minimal working example:
%! TEX program = xelatex
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{exterior}{Lambda}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
exterior^k V \
Lambda^k V
end{align*}
end{document}
This is the output:
Removing usepackage{fontspec}
makes the Lambda appear.
Funnily enough, if one also adds unicode-math
in the mix, i.e.
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{unicode-math}
usepackage{amsmath}
it works. But unicode-math
recommends to load it after amsmath
, so it can override commands. Though this breaks it again, which is really confusing to me.
Is there a sensible way to use fontspec
and amsmath
together? Did I miss something?
math-mode xetex amsmath fontspec greek
Using fontspec
together with amsmath
breaks the use of capital greek letters in DeclareMathOperator
. Instead, the greek letter just is omitted.
Here is a minimal working example:
%! TEX program = xelatex
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{amsmath}
DeclareMathOperator{exterior}{Lambda}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
exterior^k V \
Lambda^k V
end{align*}
end{document}
This is the output:
Removing usepackage{fontspec}
makes the Lambda appear.
Funnily enough, if one also adds unicode-math
in the mix, i.e.
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{unicode-math}
usepackage{amsmath}
it works. But unicode-math
recommends to load it after amsmath
, so it can override commands. Though this breaks it again, which is really confusing to me.
Is there a sensible way to use fontspec
and amsmath
together? Did I miss something?
math-mode xetex amsmath fontspec greek
math-mode xetex amsmath fontspec greek
edited 7 hours ago
Sebastiano
10.4k42060
10.4k42060
asked 10 hours ago
red_trumpetred_trumpet
20629
20629
Alternatively, you could typeset the operator using a properly changed variant ofwedge
as shown here. (I guess that the convention of usingLambda
for exterior product space powers is due to laziness, not semactics... usingwedge
seems more consistent to me.)
– phg
2 hours ago
Yeah I actually came from this. Though mostly the symbol is too big for my taste (e.g.bigwedge
), or does not scale in subscripts (e.g. the solution usingmbox
). I also do not understand the more involved solutions, and am not particularly keen to add those.
– red_trumpet
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Alternatively, you could typeset the operator using a properly changed variant ofwedge
as shown here. (I guess that the convention of usingLambda
for exterior product space powers is due to laziness, not semactics... usingwedge
seems more consistent to me.)
– phg
2 hours ago
Yeah I actually came from this. Though mostly the symbol is too big for my taste (e.g.bigwedge
), or does not scale in subscripts (e.g. the solution usingmbox
). I also do not understand the more involved solutions, and am not particularly keen to add those.
– red_trumpet
2 hours ago
Alternatively, you could typeset the operator using a properly changed variant of
wedge
as shown here. (I guess that the convention of using Lambda
for exterior product space powers is due to laziness, not semactics... using wedge
seems more consistent to me.)– phg
2 hours ago
Alternatively, you could typeset the operator using a properly changed variant of
wedge
as shown here. (I guess that the convention of using Lambda
for exterior product space powers is due to laziness, not semactics... using wedge
seems more consistent to me.)– phg
2 hours ago
Yeah I actually came from this. Though mostly the symbol is too big for my taste (e.g.
bigwedge
), or does not scale in subscripts (e.g. the solution using mbox
). I also do not understand the more involved solutions, and am not particularly keen to add those.– red_trumpet
2 hours ago
Yeah I actually came from this. Though mostly the symbol is too big for my taste (e.g.
bigwedge
), or does not scale in subscripts (e.g. the solution using mbox
). I also do not understand the more involved solutions, and am not particularly keen to add those.– red_trumpet
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
DeclareMathOperator uses internally the operator font, and this is changed by fontspec. Why the new font does have a Lambda, it doesn't have it in the same glyph slot.
You could either load fontspec with the [no-math]
option, or use the real glyph:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{fontspec}
DeclareMathOperator{exterior}{Λ}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
exterior^k V\
Lambda^k V
end{align*}
end{document}
Thanks. Any idea why the glyph slot is changed? That seems not very reasonable...
– red_trumpet
6 hours ago
unicode engines and unicode fonts do change slots. You can't expect that a Lambda is at the same place in a OT1 legacy font than in unicode font.
– Ulrike Fischer
6 hours ago
1
@red_trumpet It’s a little complicated to go into in the comments. Traditionally,Lambda
came from a special math-letter font in the legacy OML encoding. Then,amsmath
operators set the font tooperator@font
and are really intended to typeset text likesin
orlog
. If you loadfontspec
, it tries to enable modern fonts in text mode and still support legacy math fonts that containLambda
. One thing it does is changeoperator@font
to the text font. But it does this in such a way thatLambda
doesn’t work. It ends up trying to load the wrong codepoint.
– Davislor
2 hours ago
1
@red_trumpet The solution is to use a different command to either load the Unicode character Λ from the operator font (the default, Latin Modern Roman, has it), or use a different math-mode command to get a Lambda. For example,mathnormalLambda
overrides the operator font and works (although this is slanted by default),upLambda
fromunicode-math
,Uplambda
,Lambdaup
, etc. from various legacy packages.
– Davislor
2 hours ago
1
@red_trumpet Another alternative is not to useDeclareMathOperator
at all. You can just define it asmathop{Lambda}
to get operator-like spacing.
– Davislor
2 hours ago
|
show 9 more comments
The definition of Lambda
is mathchar"7003
, which means that when operator@font
is in effect, the glyph from slot 3 in that font is used, which doesn't exist.
You can avoid it with a trick:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{opgreek}[1]{begingroupmathgroup-1 #1endgroup}
DeclareMathOperator{exterior}{opgreek{Lambda}}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
exterior^k V \
Lambda^k V
end{align*}
end{document}
Otherwise
newcommand{exterior}{mathop{kern0ptLambda}}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477662%2ffontspec-breaks-capital-greek-letters-in-declaremathoperator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
DeclareMathOperator uses internally the operator font, and this is changed by fontspec. Why the new font does have a Lambda, it doesn't have it in the same glyph slot.
You could either load fontspec with the [no-math]
option, or use the real glyph:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{fontspec}
DeclareMathOperator{exterior}{Λ}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
exterior^k V\
Lambda^k V
end{align*}
end{document}
Thanks. Any idea why the glyph slot is changed? That seems not very reasonable...
– red_trumpet
6 hours ago
unicode engines and unicode fonts do change slots. You can't expect that a Lambda is at the same place in a OT1 legacy font than in unicode font.
– Ulrike Fischer
6 hours ago
1
@red_trumpet It’s a little complicated to go into in the comments. Traditionally,Lambda
came from a special math-letter font in the legacy OML encoding. Then,amsmath
operators set the font tooperator@font
and are really intended to typeset text likesin
orlog
. If you loadfontspec
, it tries to enable modern fonts in text mode and still support legacy math fonts that containLambda
. One thing it does is changeoperator@font
to the text font. But it does this in such a way thatLambda
doesn’t work. It ends up trying to load the wrong codepoint.
– Davislor
2 hours ago
1
@red_trumpet The solution is to use a different command to either load the Unicode character Λ from the operator font (the default, Latin Modern Roman, has it), or use a different math-mode command to get a Lambda. For example,mathnormalLambda
overrides the operator font and works (although this is slanted by default),upLambda
fromunicode-math
,Uplambda
,Lambdaup
, etc. from various legacy packages.
– Davislor
2 hours ago
1
@red_trumpet Another alternative is not to useDeclareMathOperator
at all. You can just define it asmathop{Lambda}
to get operator-like spacing.
– Davislor
2 hours ago
|
show 9 more comments
DeclareMathOperator uses internally the operator font, and this is changed by fontspec. Why the new font does have a Lambda, it doesn't have it in the same glyph slot.
You could either load fontspec with the [no-math]
option, or use the real glyph:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{fontspec}
DeclareMathOperator{exterior}{Λ}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
exterior^k V\
Lambda^k V
end{align*}
end{document}
Thanks. Any idea why the glyph slot is changed? That seems not very reasonable...
– red_trumpet
6 hours ago
unicode engines and unicode fonts do change slots. You can't expect that a Lambda is at the same place in a OT1 legacy font than in unicode font.
– Ulrike Fischer
6 hours ago
1
@red_trumpet It’s a little complicated to go into in the comments. Traditionally,Lambda
came from a special math-letter font in the legacy OML encoding. Then,amsmath
operators set the font tooperator@font
and are really intended to typeset text likesin
orlog
. If you loadfontspec
, it tries to enable modern fonts in text mode and still support legacy math fonts that containLambda
. One thing it does is changeoperator@font
to the text font. But it does this in such a way thatLambda
doesn’t work. It ends up trying to load the wrong codepoint.
– Davislor
2 hours ago
1
@red_trumpet The solution is to use a different command to either load the Unicode character Λ from the operator font (the default, Latin Modern Roman, has it), or use a different math-mode command to get a Lambda. For example,mathnormalLambda
overrides the operator font and works (although this is slanted by default),upLambda
fromunicode-math
,Uplambda
,Lambdaup
, etc. from various legacy packages.
– Davislor
2 hours ago
1
@red_trumpet Another alternative is not to useDeclareMathOperator
at all. You can just define it asmathop{Lambda}
to get operator-like spacing.
– Davislor
2 hours ago
|
show 9 more comments
DeclareMathOperator uses internally the operator font, and this is changed by fontspec. Why the new font does have a Lambda, it doesn't have it in the same glyph slot.
You could either load fontspec with the [no-math]
option, or use the real glyph:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{fontspec}
DeclareMathOperator{exterior}{Λ}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
exterior^k V\
Lambda^k V
end{align*}
end{document}
DeclareMathOperator uses internally the operator font, and this is changed by fontspec. Why the new font does have a Lambda, it doesn't have it in the same glyph slot.
You could either load fontspec with the [no-math]
option, or use the real glyph:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{fontspec}
DeclareMathOperator{exterior}{Λ}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
exterior^k V\
Lambda^k V
end{align*}
end{document}
answered 7 hours ago
Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer
194k8302687
194k8302687
Thanks. Any idea why the glyph slot is changed? That seems not very reasonable...
– red_trumpet
6 hours ago
unicode engines and unicode fonts do change slots. You can't expect that a Lambda is at the same place in a OT1 legacy font than in unicode font.
– Ulrike Fischer
6 hours ago
1
@red_trumpet It’s a little complicated to go into in the comments. Traditionally,Lambda
came from a special math-letter font in the legacy OML encoding. Then,amsmath
operators set the font tooperator@font
and are really intended to typeset text likesin
orlog
. If you loadfontspec
, it tries to enable modern fonts in text mode and still support legacy math fonts that containLambda
. One thing it does is changeoperator@font
to the text font. But it does this in such a way thatLambda
doesn’t work. It ends up trying to load the wrong codepoint.
– Davislor
2 hours ago
1
@red_trumpet The solution is to use a different command to either load the Unicode character Λ from the operator font (the default, Latin Modern Roman, has it), or use a different math-mode command to get a Lambda. For example,mathnormalLambda
overrides the operator font and works (although this is slanted by default),upLambda
fromunicode-math
,Uplambda
,Lambdaup
, etc. from various legacy packages.
– Davislor
2 hours ago
1
@red_trumpet Another alternative is not to useDeclareMathOperator
at all. You can just define it asmathop{Lambda}
to get operator-like spacing.
– Davislor
2 hours ago
|
show 9 more comments
Thanks. Any idea why the glyph slot is changed? That seems not very reasonable...
– red_trumpet
6 hours ago
unicode engines and unicode fonts do change slots. You can't expect that a Lambda is at the same place in a OT1 legacy font than in unicode font.
– Ulrike Fischer
6 hours ago
1
@red_trumpet It’s a little complicated to go into in the comments. Traditionally,Lambda
came from a special math-letter font in the legacy OML encoding. Then,amsmath
operators set the font tooperator@font
and are really intended to typeset text likesin
orlog
. If you loadfontspec
, it tries to enable modern fonts in text mode and still support legacy math fonts that containLambda
. One thing it does is changeoperator@font
to the text font. But it does this in such a way thatLambda
doesn’t work. It ends up trying to load the wrong codepoint.
– Davislor
2 hours ago
1
@red_trumpet The solution is to use a different command to either load the Unicode character Λ from the operator font (the default, Latin Modern Roman, has it), or use a different math-mode command to get a Lambda. For example,mathnormalLambda
overrides the operator font and works (although this is slanted by default),upLambda
fromunicode-math
,Uplambda
,Lambdaup
, etc. from various legacy packages.
– Davislor
2 hours ago
1
@red_trumpet Another alternative is not to useDeclareMathOperator
at all. You can just define it asmathop{Lambda}
to get operator-like spacing.
– Davislor
2 hours ago
Thanks. Any idea why the glyph slot is changed? That seems not very reasonable...
– red_trumpet
6 hours ago
Thanks. Any idea why the glyph slot is changed? That seems not very reasonable...
– red_trumpet
6 hours ago
unicode engines and unicode fonts do change slots. You can't expect that a Lambda is at the same place in a OT1 legacy font than in unicode font.
– Ulrike Fischer
6 hours ago
unicode engines and unicode fonts do change slots. You can't expect that a Lambda is at the same place in a OT1 legacy font than in unicode font.
– Ulrike Fischer
6 hours ago
1
1
@red_trumpet It’s a little complicated to go into in the comments. Traditionally,
Lambda
came from a special math-letter font in the legacy OML encoding. Then, amsmath
operators set the font to operator@font
and are really intended to typeset text like sin
or log
. If you load fontspec
, it tries to enable modern fonts in text mode and still support legacy math fonts that contain Lambda
. One thing it does is change operator@font
to the text font. But it does this in such a way that Lambda
doesn’t work. It ends up trying to load the wrong codepoint.– Davislor
2 hours ago
@red_trumpet It’s a little complicated to go into in the comments. Traditionally,
Lambda
came from a special math-letter font in the legacy OML encoding. Then, amsmath
operators set the font to operator@font
and are really intended to typeset text like sin
or log
. If you load fontspec
, it tries to enable modern fonts in text mode and still support legacy math fonts that contain Lambda
. One thing it does is change operator@font
to the text font. But it does this in such a way that Lambda
doesn’t work. It ends up trying to load the wrong codepoint.– Davislor
2 hours ago
1
1
@red_trumpet The solution is to use a different command to either load the Unicode character Λ from the operator font (the default, Latin Modern Roman, has it), or use a different math-mode command to get a Lambda. For example,
mathnormalLambda
overrides the operator font and works (although this is slanted by default), upLambda
from unicode-math
, Uplambda
, Lambdaup
, etc. from various legacy packages.– Davislor
2 hours ago
@red_trumpet The solution is to use a different command to either load the Unicode character Λ from the operator font (the default, Latin Modern Roman, has it), or use a different math-mode command to get a Lambda. For example,
mathnormalLambda
overrides the operator font and works (although this is slanted by default), upLambda
from unicode-math
, Uplambda
, Lambdaup
, etc. from various legacy packages.– Davislor
2 hours ago
1
1
@red_trumpet Another alternative is not to use
DeclareMathOperator
at all. You can just define it as mathop{Lambda}
to get operator-like spacing.– Davislor
2 hours ago
@red_trumpet Another alternative is not to use
DeclareMathOperator
at all. You can just define it as mathop{Lambda}
to get operator-like spacing.– Davislor
2 hours ago
|
show 9 more comments
The definition of Lambda
is mathchar"7003
, which means that when operator@font
is in effect, the glyph from slot 3 in that font is used, which doesn't exist.
You can avoid it with a trick:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{opgreek}[1]{begingroupmathgroup-1 #1endgroup}
DeclareMathOperator{exterior}{opgreek{Lambda}}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
exterior^k V \
Lambda^k V
end{align*}
end{document}
Otherwise
newcommand{exterior}{mathop{kern0ptLambda}}
add a comment |
The definition of Lambda
is mathchar"7003
, which means that when operator@font
is in effect, the glyph from slot 3 in that font is used, which doesn't exist.
You can avoid it with a trick:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{opgreek}[1]{begingroupmathgroup-1 #1endgroup}
DeclareMathOperator{exterior}{opgreek{Lambda}}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
exterior^k V \
Lambda^k V
end{align*}
end{document}
Otherwise
newcommand{exterior}{mathop{kern0ptLambda}}
add a comment |
The definition of Lambda
is mathchar"7003
, which means that when operator@font
is in effect, the glyph from slot 3 in that font is used, which doesn't exist.
You can avoid it with a trick:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{opgreek}[1]{begingroupmathgroup-1 #1endgroup}
DeclareMathOperator{exterior}{opgreek{Lambda}}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
exterior^k V \
Lambda^k V
end{align*}
end{document}
Otherwise
newcommand{exterior}{mathop{kern0ptLambda}}
The definition of Lambda
is mathchar"7003
, which means that when operator@font
is in effect, the glyph from slot 3 in that font is used, which doesn't exist.
You can avoid it with a trick:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{opgreek}[1]{begingroupmathgroup-1 #1endgroup}
DeclareMathOperator{exterior}{opgreek{Lambda}}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
exterior^k V \
Lambda^k V
end{align*}
end{document}
Otherwise
newcommand{exterior}{mathop{kern0ptLambda}}
answered 7 hours ago
egregegreg
724k8819173222
724k8819173222
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477662%2ffontspec-breaks-capital-greek-letters-in-declaremathoperator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Alternatively, you could typeset the operator using a properly changed variant of
wedge
as shown here. (I guess that the convention of usingLambda
for exterior product space powers is due to laziness, not semactics... usingwedge
seems more consistent to me.)– phg
2 hours ago
Yeah I actually came from this. Though mostly the symbol is too big for my taste (e.g.
bigwedge
), or does not scale in subscripts (e.g. the solution usingmbox
). I also do not understand the more involved solutions, and am not particularly keen to add those.– red_trumpet
2 hours ago