accidentially modifying the binary of a file whilst it is runningWhat is good about the BSDs?Data recovery...

In the late 1940’s to early 1950’s what technology was available that could melt a LOT of ice?

Are there historical instances of the capital of a colonising country being temporarily or permanently shifted to one of its colonies?

Is it true that real estate prices mainly go up?

How to create a hard link to an inode (ext4)?

Does "variables should live in the smallest scope as possible" include the case "variables should not exist if possible"?

Does splitting a potentially monolithic application into several smaller ones help prevent bugs?

Can someone explain what is being said here in color publishing in the American Mathematical Monthly?

Are babies of evil humanoid species inherently evil?

Why would one plane in this picture not have gear down yet?

Why does Captain Marvel assume the planet where she lands would recognize her credentials?

Accountant/ lawyer will not return my call

Latest web browser compatible with Windows 98

String reversal in Python

2×2×2 rubik's cube corner is twisted!

BitNot does not flip bits in the way I expected

If the Captain's screens are out, does he switch seats with the co-pilot?

Why would a jet engine that runs at temps excess of 2000°C burn when it crashes?

Should QA ask requirements to developers?

Do Bugbears' arms literally get longer when it's their turn?

Do f-stop and exposure time perfectly cancel?

A three room house but a three headED dog

Am I not good enough for you?

Built-In Shelves/Bookcases - IKEA vs Built

They call me Inspector Morse



accidentially modifying the binary of a file whilst it is running


What is good about the BSDs?Data recovery options for unix file systemsRunning PostgreSQL Inside a Jail Using FreeBSDWhat are the alternatives to using allow.sysvipc in a jail running PostgreSQL in FreeBSDNeed help debugging: Suspect file server is running slowly because of nfs loadModifying NFS (XFS) File Attributes from within WindowsFile modifications lagging behindHow do I get the file name corresponding to an NFS file handle on Linux?Inconsistent file content on NFSBSD jail availability in the event of NFS server failure













0















I have several FreeBSD boxes mix of V10 and V11 that all have some binaries mounted over nfs. unfortunately a situation came about when one was executed whilst it was still being uploaded to the nfs server.



I would have expected the processes to crash, but the result is multiple instances of the process in a wait state of vmpfw and attempting to ls the directory containing the binaries, of sym links to causes the shell to freeze



Ive done a power cycle on all machines that I can to clear this, but there are a few where this is going to be exceedingly inconvienient. Is there any way of killing these processes, and restoring responsiveness










share|improve this question























  • try with umount -f

    – kofemann
    Oct 4 '17 at 16:19











  • @kofemann I tried that on the mount that contained the binary. The command takes infinite time, seemingly going into yet another uninteruptable sleep

    – camelccc
    Oct 4 '17 at 22:07
















0















I have several FreeBSD boxes mix of V10 and V11 that all have some binaries mounted over nfs. unfortunately a situation came about when one was executed whilst it was still being uploaded to the nfs server.



I would have expected the processes to crash, but the result is multiple instances of the process in a wait state of vmpfw and attempting to ls the directory containing the binaries, of sym links to causes the shell to freeze



Ive done a power cycle on all machines that I can to clear this, but there are a few where this is going to be exceedingly inconvienient. Is there any way of killing these processes, and restoring responsiveness










share|improve this question























  • try with umount -f

    – kofemann
    Oct 4 '17 at 16:19











  • @kofemann I tried that on the mount that contained the binary. The command takes infinite time, seemingly going into yet another uninteruptable sleep

    – camelccc
    Oct 4 '17 at 22:07














0












0








0








I have several FreeBSD boxes mix of V10 and V11 that all have some binaries mounted over nfs. unfortunately a situation came about when one was executed whilst it was still being uploaded to the nfs server.



I would have expected the processes to crash, but the result is multiple instances of the process in a wait state of vmpfw and attempting to ls the directory containing the binaries, of sym links to causes the shell to freeze



Ive done a power cycle on all machines that I can to clear this, but there are a few where this is going to be exceedingly inconvienient. Is there any way of killing these processes, and restoring responsiveness










share|improve this question














I have several FreeBSD boxes mix of V10 and V11 that all have some binaries mounted over nfs. unfortunately a situation came about when one was executed whilst it was still being uploaded to the nfs server.



I would have expected the processes to crash, but the result is multiple instances of the process in a wait state of vmpfw and attempting to ls the directory containing the binaries, of sym links to causes the shell to freeze



Ive done a power cycle on all machines that I can to clear this, but there are a few where this is going to be exceedingly inconvienient. Is there any way of killing these processes, and restoring responsiveness







nfs bsd






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Oct 2 '17 at 20:39









camelccccamelccc

15312




15312













  • try with umount -f

    – kofemann
    Oct 4 '17 at 16:19











  • @kofemann I tried that on the mount that contained the binary. The command takes infinite time, seemingly going into yet another uninteruptable sleep

    – camelccc
    Oct 4 '17 at 22:07



















  • try with umount -f

    – kofemann
    Oct 4 '17 at 16:19











  • @kofemann I tried that on the mount that contained the binary. The command takes infinite time, seemingly going into yet another uninteruptable sleep

    – camelccc
    Oct 4 '17 at 22:07

















try with umount -f

– kofemann
Oct 4 '17 at 16:19





try with umount -f

– kofemann
Oct 4 '17 at 16:19













@kofemann I tried that on the mount that contained the binary. The command takes infinite time, seemingly going into yet another uninteruptable sleep

– camelccc
Oct 4 '17 at 22:07





@kofemann I tried that on the mount that contained the binary. The command takes infinite time, seemingly going into yet another uninteruptable sleep

– camelccc
Oct 4 '17 at 22:07










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














can't comment but can't freebsd-update IDS find the non-maching checksum files and the next fetch update will update them to the "good" version? at least for system files it should work.





share























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "2"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f876506%2faccidentially-modifying-the-binary-of-a-file-whilst-it-is-running%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    can't comment but can't freebsd-update IDS find the non-maching checksum files and the next fetch update will update them to the "good" version? at least for system files it should work.





    share




























      0














      can't comment but can't freebsd-update IDS find the non-maching checksum files and the next fetch update will update them to the "good" version? at least for system files it should work.





      share


























        0












        0








        0







        can't comment but can't freebsd-update IDS find the non-maching checksum files and the next fetch update will update them to the "good" version? at least for system files it should work.





        share













        can't comment but can't freebsd-update IDS find the non-maching checksum files and the next fetch update will update them to the "good" version? at least for system files it should work.






        share











        share


        share










        answered 2 mins ago









        JBJJBJ

        1




        1






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f876506%2faccidentially-modifying-the-binary-of-a-file-whilst-it-is-running%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            As a Security Precaution, the user account has been locked The Next CEO of Stack OverflowMS...

            Список ссавців Італії Природоохоронні статуси | Список |...

            Українські прізвища Зміст Історичні відомості |...