Bridging and routing IPv6 Router Advertisements The Next CEO of Stack OverflowNATing IPv4...
Is it possible to use a NPN BJT as switch, from single power source?
Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?
Can MTA send mail via a relay without being told so?
Poetry, calligrams and TikZ/PStricks challenge
Domestic-to-international connection at Orlando (MCO)
0-rank tensor vs vector in 1D
Running a General Election and the European Elections together
Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons
If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?
Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?
Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)
WOW air has ceased operation, can I get my tickets refunded?
When you upcast Blindness/Deafness, do all targets suffer the same effect?
Is micro rebar a better way to reinforce concrete than rebar?
Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?
Method for adding error messages to a dictionary given a key
The past simple of "gaslight" – "gaslighted" or "gaslit"?
Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?
Recycling old answers
What connection does MS Office have to Netscape Navigator?
Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?
How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?
Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?
Calculator final project in Python
Bridging and routing IPv6 Router Advertisements
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowNATing IPv4 while routing IPv6On IPv6 linux router, autoconf and accept router advertisements for single interfaceRouting between two interfacesLinux: iptables and marking confusionForwarding traffic between interfaces inside a docker containerEbtables to setup forwarding and natLinux Routing with two NICs (LAN vs Internet) with NAT and bridging for VMsIPv6 Routing // Destination unreachable: Beyond scope of source addresseth0-wlan0 brouter bridging IPv6, not forwarding/bridging IPv4, with DHCPv4 client *and* serverVPN Router does not reply to ARP Requests
I have a bridge called "br01" in which the interfaces "eth1" and "eth0" are participating. There is a rule in the broute table of ebtables that drops RAs when they arrive in the interface eth1, so the eth1 auto-configure itself with this RA, but I want that this same RA go through the eth0 too, in order to distribute this RA to the other network which is on the eth0. Is there any way to do that ?
iptables router routing ipv6
asked Jul 5 '11 at 12:27
AldebaranAldebaran
175111
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I have a bridge called "br01" in which the interfaces "eth1" and "eth0" are participating. There is a rule in the broute table of ebtables that drops RAs when they arrive in the interface eth1, so the eth1 auto-configure itself with this RA, but I want that this same RA go through the eth0 too, in order to distribute this RA to the other network which is on the eth0. Is there any way to do that ?
iptables router routing ipv6
asked Jul 5 '11 at 12:27
AldebaranAldebaran
175111
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
possible duplicate of Bridge and route packet
– Chris S
Jul 5 '11 at 13:12
Can you show me the output ofifconfig?
– bahamat
Jul 9 '11 at 16:16
Your eth1 interface should not be configuring itself with the RA. The br01 interface should be the one with the addresses.
– MikeyB
Jul 15 '11 at 18:49
add a comment |
I have a bridge called "br01" in which the interfaces "eth1" and "eth0" are participating. There is a rule in the broute table of ebtables that drops RAs when they arrive in the interface eth1, so the eth1 auto-configure itself with this RA, but I want that this same RA go through the eth0 too, in order to distribute this RA to the other network which is on the eth0. Is there any way to do that ?
iptables router routing ipv6
asked Jul 5 '11 at 12:27
AldebaranAldebaran
175111
I have a bridge called "br01" in which the interfaces "eth1" and "eth0" are participating. There is a rule in the broute table of ebtables that drops RAs when they arrive in the interface eth1, so the eth1 auto-configure itself with this RA, but I want that this same RA go through the eth0 too, in order to distribute this RA to the other network which is on the eth0. Is there any way to do that ?
iptables router routing ipv6
iptables router routing ipv6
asked Jul 5 '11 at 12:27
AldebaranAldebaran
175111
asked Jul 5 '11 at 12:27
AldebaranAldebaran
175111
asked Jul 5 '11 at 12:27
AldebaranAldebaran
175111
asked Jul 5 '11 at 12:27
AldebaranAldebaran
175111
asked Jul 5 '11 at 12:27
AldebaranAldebaran
175111
175111
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
possible duplicate of Bridge and route packet
– Chris S
Jul 5 '11 at 13:12
Can you show me the output ofifconfig?
– bahamat
Jul 9 '11 at 16:16
Your eth1 interface should not be configuring itself with the RA. The br01 interface should be the one with the addresses.
– MikeyB
Jul 15 '11 at 18:49
add a comment |
1
possible duplicate of Bridge and route packet
– Chris S
Jul 5 '11 at 13:12
Can you show me the output ofifconfig?
– bahamat
Jul 9 '11 at 16:16
Your eth1 interface should not be configuring itself with the RA. The br01 interface should be the one with the addresses.
– MikeyB
Jul 15 '11 at 18:49
1
1
possible duplicate of Bridge and route packet
– Chris S
Jul 5 '11 at 13:12
possible duplicate of Bridge and route packet
– Chris S
Jul 5 '11 at 13:12
Can you show me the output of
ifconfig?– bahamat
Jul 9 '11 at 16:16
Can you show me the output of
ifconfig?– bahamat
Jul 9 '11 at 16:16
Your eth1 interface should not be configuring itself with the RA. The br01 interface should be the one with the addresses.
– MikeyB
Jul 15 '11 at 18:49
Your eth1 interface should not be configuring itself with the RA. The br01 interface should be the one with the addresses.
– MikeyB
Jul 15 '11 at 18:49
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If you don't want an ebtables rule that drops the packet, why not remove that rule?
answered Jul 9 '11 at 7:44
womble♦womble
85.6k18144204
If I remove, the the packet goes to eth0 but not in the eth1, if don't remove, it goes to eth1 but not in the eth0, what I want is to have both interfaces receiving the packet.
– Aldebaran
Jul 9 '11 at 15:54
1
That's not how bridging works. Once an interface is in a bridge, it no longer functions as an independent interface.
– womble♦
Jul 9 '11 at 21:42
Yes I know, but I can do that using the target TEE for instance. So it will route the packet to eth1 and then to eth0 again by cloning the packet. But the use of TEE isn't an option in my case.
– Aldebaran
Jul 15 '11 at 16:20
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f287092%2fbridging-and-routing-ipv6-router-advertisements%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you don't want an ebtables rule that drops the packet, why not remove that rule?
answered Jul 9 '11 at 7:44
womble♦womble
85.6k18144204
If I remove, the the packet goes to eth0 but not in the eth1, if don't remove, it goes to eth1 but not in the eth0, what I want is to have both interfaces receiving the packet.
– Aldebaran
Jul 9 '11 at 15:54
1
That's not how bridging works. Once an interface is in a bridge, it no longer functions as an independent interface.
– womble♦
Jul 9 '11 at 21:42
Yes I know, but I can do that using the target TEE for instance. So it will route the packet to eth1 and then to eth0 again by cloning the packet. But the use of TEE isn't an option in my case.
– Aldebaran
Jul 15 '11 at 16:20
add a comment |
If you don't want an ebtables rule that drops the packet, why not remove that rule?
answered Jul 9 '11 at 7:44
womble♦womble
85.6k18144204
If I remove, the the packet goes to eth0 but not in the eth1, if don't remove, it goes to eth1 but not in the eth0, what I want is to have both interfaces receiving the packet.
– Aldebaran
Jul 9 '11 at 15:54
1
That's not how bridging works. Once an interface is in a bridge, it no longer functions as an independent interface.
– womble♦
Jul 9 '11 at 21:42
Yes I know, but I can do that using the target TEE for instance. So it will route the packet to eth1 and then to eth0 again by cloning the packet. But the use of TEE isn't an option in my case.
– Aldebaran
Jul 15 '11 at 16:20
add a comment |
If you don't want an ebtables rule that drops the packet, why not remove that rule?
answered Jul 9 '11 at 7:44
womble♦womble
85.6k18144204
If you don't want an ebtables rule that drops the packet, why not remove that rule?
answered Jul 9 '11 at 7:44
womble♦womble
85.6k18144204
answered Jul 9 '11 at 7:44
womble♦womble
85.6k18144204
answered Jul 9 '11 at 7:44
womble♦womble
85.6k18144204
answered Jul 9 '11 at 7:44
womble♦womble
85.6k18144204
85.6k18144204
If I remove, the the packet goes to eth0 but not in the eth1, if don't remove, it goes to eth1 but not in the eth0, what I want is to have both interfaces receiving the packet.
– Aldebaran
Jul 9 '11 at 15:54
1
That's not how bridging works. Once an interface is in a bridge, it no longer functions as an independent interface.
– womble♦
Jul 9 '11 at 21:42
Yes I know, but I can do that using the target TEE for instance. So it will route the packet to eth1 and then to eth0 again by cloning the packet. But the use of TEE isn't an option in my case.
– Aldebaran
Jul 15 '11 at 16:20
add a comment |
If I remove, the the packet goes to eth0 but not in the eth1, if don't remove, it goes to eth1 but not in the eth0, what I want is to have both interfaces receiving the packet.
– Aldebaran
Jul 9 '11 at 15:54
1
That's not how bridging works. Once an interface is in a bridge, it no longer functions as an independent interface.
– womble♦
Jul 9 '11 at 21:42
Yes I know, but I can do that using the target TEE for instance. So it will route the packet to eth1 and then to eth0 again by cloning the packet. But the use of TEE isn't an option in my case.
– Aldebaran
Jul 15 '11 at 16:20
If I remove, the the packet goes to eth0 but not in the eth1, if don't remove, it goes to eth1 but not in the eth0, what I want is to have both interfaces receiving the packet.
– Aldebaran
Jul 9 '11 at 15:54
If I remove, the the packet goes to eth0 but not in the eth1, if don't remove, it goes to eth1 but not in the eth0, what I want is to have both interfaces receiving the packet.
– Aldebaran
Jul 9 '11 at 15:54
1
1
That's not how bridging works. Once an interface is in a bridge, it no longer functions as an independent interface.
– womble♦
Jul 9 '11 at 21:42
That's not how bridging works. Once an interface is in a bridge, it no longer functions as an independent interface.
– womble♦
Jul 9 '11 at 21:42
Yes I know, but I can do that using the target TEE for instance. So it will route the packet to eth1 and then to eth0 again by cloning the packet. But the use of TEE isn't an option in my case.
– Aldebaran
Jul 15 '11 at 16:20
Yes I know, but I can do that using the target TEE for instance. So it will route the packet to eth1 and then to eth0 again by cloning the packet. But the use of TEE isn't an option in my case.
– Aldebaran
Jul 15 '11 at 16:20
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f287092%2fbridging-and-routing-ipv6-router-advertisements%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
possible duplicate of Bridge and route packet
– Chris S
Jul 5 '11 at 13:12
Can you show me the output of
ifconfig?– bahamat
Jul 9 '11 at 16:16
Your eth1 interface should not be configuring itself with the RA. The br01 interface should be the one with the addresses.
– MikeyB
Jul 15 '11 at 18:49