Infinitive vs GerundAre my interpretations correct?When talking of American money, what does “pennies”...
Where do you go through passport control when transiting through another Schengen airport on your way out of the Schengen area?
What is the oldest European royal house?
What is the meaning of option 'by' in TikZ Intersections
Is every open circuit a capacitor?
Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?
Why aren't there more gauls like Obelix?
Problems with rounding giving too many digits
Does the in-code argument passing conventions used on PDP-11's have a name?
Deal the cards to the players
A bug in Excel? Conditional formatting for marking duplicates also highlights unique value
Paper published similar to PhD thesis
Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?
Has a sovereign Communist government ever run, and conceded loss, on a fair election?
PTiJ: How should animals pray?
Is this nominative case or accusative case?
Practical reasons to have both a large police force and bounty hunting network?
What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?
Dukha vs legitimate need
Ignoring Someone as Wrongful Speech
Why is my explanation wrong?
How to make sure I'm assertive enough in contact with subordinates?
Quitting employee has privileged access to critical information
Gemara word for QED
Under what conditions would I NOT add my Proficiency Bonus to a Spell Attack Roll (or Saving Throw DC)?
Infinitive vs Gerund
Are my interpretations correct?When talking of American money, what does “pennies” mean?Wondering why the writer used the grammar structures “would also be bidding” and “would have to pay” hereHow to use preposition “to” , infinitive “to” and “---ing”?Have I correctly rephrased the sentence?Ran More Than 40 Minutes Past 7pmTrying to understand both the grammar construction and the author's intent: Although (being) of the opinion that… /Destite the opinion thatWith or without “would”, what's the difference?Do I write “I wonder why I exist” or “I wonder why do I exist”?Question about “She hoped I would feel at home.”
The business hoped to devote most of its fund to ______ for new television ads since it wanted more coverage.
Should the answer be "pay" or "paying"? Why and, what difference would it make (if any)?
grammar usage word-difference
add a comment |
The business hoped to devote most of its fund to ______ for new television ads since it wanted more coverage.
Should the answer be "pay" or "paying"? Why and, what difference would it make (if any)?
grammar usage word-difference
add a comment |
The business hoped to devote most of its fund to ______ for new television ads since it wanted more coverage.
Should the answer be "pay" or "paying"? Why and, what difference would it make (if any)?
grammar usage word-difference
The business hoped to devote most of its fund to ______ for new television ads since it wanted more coverage.
Should the answer be "pay" or "paying"? Why and, what difference would it make (if any)?
grammar usage word-difference
grammar usage word-difference
edited 4 hours ago
Gustavson
2,800311
2,800311
asked 5 hours ago
JoeJoe
2714
2714
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
"to" is a preposition there, so a gerund is required.
The correct sentence is:
- The business hoped to devote most of its fund to paying for new television ads since it wanted more coverage.
You devote money, time, effort, etc. to something, and that something needs to be a noun. If it is a verb, its nominal variant (i.e. a gerund) will be required.
Here you can find more examples.
add a comment |
What follows to should be a noun (or verb acting as a noun), making this the correct version of your sentence:
The business hoped to devote most of its funds to paying for new television ads, since it wanted more coverage.
Note that I used the plural funds on the assumption that you're talking about budget or money rather than an actual fund. I also added a comma after ads.
Having said that, I would dispense with to paying for altogether. It's redundant.
A shorter and still understandable sentence is simply:
The business hoped to devote most of its funds to new television ads, since it wanted more coverage.
On the other hand, you can rephrase the original sentence so pay can be used rather than paying. To do this, you would remove devote and rearrange things a bit:
The business hoped to pay for new television ads with most of its funds, since it wanted more coverage.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199593%2finfinitive-vs-gerund%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
"to" is a preposition there, so a gerund is required.
The correct sentence is:
- The business hoped to devote most of its fund to paying for new television ads since it wanted more coverage.
You devote money, time, effort, etc. to something, and that something needs to be a noun. If it is a verb, its nominal variant (i.e. a gerund) will be required.
Here you can find more examples.
add a comment |
"to" is a preposition there, so a gerund is required.
The correct sentence is:
- The business hoped to devote most of its fund to paying for new television ads since it wanted more coverage.
You devote money, time, effort, etc. to something, and that something needs to be a noun. If it is a verb, its nominal variant (i.e. a gerund) will be required.
Here you can find more examples.
add a comment |
"to" is a preposition there, so a gerund is required.
The correct sentence is:
- The business hoped to devote most of its fund to paying for new television ads since it wanted more coverage.
You devote money, time, effort, etc. to something, and that something needs to be a noun. If it is a verb, its nominal variant (i.e. a gerund) will be required.
Here you can find more examples.
"to" is a preposition there, so a gerund is required.
The correct sentence is:
- The business hoped to devote most of its fund to paying for new television ads since it wanted more coverage.
You devote money, time, effort, etc. to something, and that something needs to be a noun. If it is a verb, its nominal variant (i.e. a gerund) will be required.
Here you can find more examples.
answered 4 hours ago
GustavsonGustavson
2,800311
2,800311
add a comment |
add a comment |
What follows to should be a noun (or verb acting as a noun), making this the correct version of your sentence:
The business hoped to devote most of its funds to paying for new television ads, since it wanted more coverage.
Note that I used the plural funds on the assumption that you're talking about budget or money rather than an actual fund. I also added a comma after ads.
Having said that, I would dispense with to paying for altogether. It's redundant.
A shorter and still understandable sentence is simply:
The business hoped to devote most of its funds to new television ads, since it wanted more coverage.
On the other hand, you can rephrase the original sentence so pay can be used rather than paying. To do this, you would remove devote and rearrange things a bit:
The business hoped to pay for new television ads with most of its funds, since it wanted more coverage.
add a comment |
What follows to should be a noun (or verb acting as a noun), making this the correct version of your sentence:
The business hoped to devote most of its funds to paying for new television ads, since it wanted more coverage.
Note that I used the plural funds on the assumption that you're talking about budget or money rather than an actual fund. I also added a comma after ads.
Having said that, I would dispense with to paying for altogether. It's redundant.
A shorter and still understandable sentence is simply:
The business hoped to devote most of its funds to new television ads, since it wanted more coverage.
On the other hand, you can rephrase the original sentence so pay can be used rather than paying. To do this, you would remove devote and rearrange things a bit:
The business hoped to pay for new television ads with most of its funds, since it wanted more coverage.
add a comment |
What follows to should be a noun (or verb acting as a noun), making this the correct version of your sentence:
The business hoped to devote most of its funds to paying for new television ads, since it wanted more coverage.
Note that I used the plural funds on the assumption that you're talking about budget or money rather than an actual fund. I also added a comma after ads.
Having said that, I would dispense with to paying for altogether. It's redundant.
A shorter and still understandable sentence is simply:
The business hoped to devote most of its funds to new television ads, since it wanted more coverage.
On the other hand, you can rephrase the original sentence so pay can be used rather than paying. To do this, you would remove devote and rearrange things a bit:
The business hoped to pay for new television ads with most of its funds, since it wanted more coverage.
What follows to should be a noun (or verb acting as a noun), making this the correct version of your sentence:
The business hoped to devote most of its funds to paying for new television ads, since it wanted more coverage.
Note that I used the plural funds on the assumption that you're talking about budget or money rather than an actual fund. I also added a comma after ads.
Having said that, I would dispense with to paying for altogether. It's redundant.
A shorter and still understandable sentence is simply:
The business hoped to devote most of its funds to new television ads, since it wanted more coverage.
On the other hand, you can rephrase the original sentence so pay can be used rather than paying. To do this, you would remove devote and rearrange things a bit:
The business hoped to pay for new television ads with most of its funds, since it wanted more coverage.
answered 3 hours ago
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
15.7k22237
15.7k22237
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199593%2finfinitive-vs-gerund%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown