RDS 2016 session limitsExternal access to RDS not workingSet RDS Default Printer By Session/ClientPrinter...
Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python
How do I find the solutions of the following equation?
What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?
How does Loki do this?
What is paid subscription needed for in Mortal Kombat 11?
Would a high gravity rocky planet be guaranteed to have an atmosphere?
How did Arya survive the stabbing?
How can I kill an app using Terminal?
Return the Closest Prime Number
How to run a prison with the smallest amount of guards?
Escape a backup date in a file name
Do sorcerers' Subtle Spells require a skill check to be unseen?
How long to clear the 'suck zone' of a turbofan after start is initiated?
Are student evaluations of teaching assistants read by others in the faculty?
Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?
Do the temporary hit points from the Battlerager barbarian's Reckless Abandon stack if I make multiple attacks on my turn?
How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?
Class Action - which options I have?
A particular customize with green line and letters for subfloat
What is the best translation for "slot" in the context of multiplayer video games?
Large drywall patch supports
Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?
Sequence of Tenses: Translating the subjunctive
Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm
RDS 2016 session limits
External access to RDS not workingSet RDS Default Printer By Session/ClientPrinter Redirection RDS GatewayRemote Desktop active session time limit disabled but not respectedServer 2012 R2 RDS does not display connections to one Host, will not redirect WAN users to the otherHow do I connect to an RDS sessionhost farm without DNSRRRD Session Host 2012R2 Session settings set via GP are not reflected in QuickSessionCollection PropertiesAfter installing RDS on WinServer 2016 I still can only connect with two users?RD Connection via RDGW to Session host is not connectingSingle RDP session and automatic disconnect of pending session group policy not working in Windows Server 2012
We have a single RDS (W2K16) which hosts all roles (Broker, Gateway, Session host). On the collection settings, we specified all session limits as "never". Still all users are logged off 6 hours after their session got disconnected (found this in the eventlog).
I've created a GPO which also sets the session limits to never (computer configuration), but this also didn't help. Sessions are still logged of 6 hours after disconnection
I checked the registry, and the keys are correct:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREPoliciesMicrosoftWindows NTTerminal Services]
"MaxDisconnectionTime"=dword:00000000
"MaxIdleTime"=dword:00000000
"MaxConnectionTime"=dword:00000000
"fResetBroken"=dword:00000000
I also checked the user objects in AD, and on the users the "session" tab also states "never" on all settings.
Next I checked the RD Gateway policies, but also there, no limits specified...
This happens on all users logging in to the RDS.
Is there any other place where session limits can be set?
EDIT: screenshots of settings:
Collection:
User:
GPO:
Gateway policies:
remote-desktop-services windows-server-2016 session
add a comment |
We have a single RDS (W2K16) which hosts all roles (Broker, Gateway, Session host). On the collection settings, we specified all session limits as "never". Still all users are logged off 6 hours after their session got disconnected (found this in the eventlog).
I've created a GPO which also sets the session limits to never (computer configuration), but this also didn't help. Sessions are still logged of 6 hours after disconnection
I checked the registry, and the keys are correct:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREPoliciesMicrosoftWindows NTTerminal Services]
"MaxDisconnectionTime"=dword:00000000
"MaxIdleTime"=dword:00000000
"MaxConnectionTime"=dword:00000000
"fResetBroken"=dword:00000000
I also checked the user objects in AD, and on the users the "session" tab also states "never" on all settings.
Next I checked the RD Gateway policies, but also there, no limits specified...
This happens on all users logging in to the RDS.
Is there any other place where session limits can be set?
EDIT: screenshots of settings:
Collection:
User:
GPO:
Gateway policies:
remote-desktop-services windows-server-2016 session
You sure the GPOs get applied correctly? Does some local security policy override your settings maybe? Please specify what you mean by "all settings", maybe you did forget to set some.
– Lenniey
Sep 13 '17 at 7:31
I've added screenshots of the settings
– Mickeybyte
Sep 13 '17 at 12:58
There should be at least two computer configuration policies, try to set them, too
– Lenniey
Sep 14 '17 at 7:55
Sorry for the late reply. What do you mean by 2 computer policies? I know only of one, the one which is shown in the screenshot above.
– Mickeybyte
Oct 9 '17 at 6:55
Just got informed by our customer that the issue has been solved. I have no idea what happened, but it seems the above settings took some "days" before getting applied (although server was rebooted and GPO's where manually applied).
– Mickeybyte
Oct 9 '17 at 8:06
add a comment |
We have a single RDS (W2K16) which hosts all roles (Broker, Gateway, Session host). On the collection settings, we specified all session limits as "never". Still all users are logged off 6 hours after their session got disconnected (found this in the eventlog).
I've created a GPO which also sets the session limits to never (computer configuration), but this also didn't help. Sessions are still logged of 6 hours after disconnection
I checked the registry, and the keys are correct:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREPoliciesMicrosoftWindows NTTerminal Services]
"MaxDisconnectionTime"=dword:00000000
"MaxIdleTime"=dword:00000000
"MaxConnectionTime"=dword:00000000
"fResetBroken"=dword:00000000
I also checked the user objects in AD, and on the users the "session" tab also states "never" on all settings.
Next I checked the RD Gateway policies, but also there, no limits specified...
This happens on all users logging in to the RDS.
Is there any other place where session limits can be set?
EDIT: screenshots of settings:
Collection:
User:
GPO:
Gateway policies:
remote-desktop-services windows-server-2016 session
We have a single RDS (W2K16) which hosts all roles (Broker, Gateway, Session host). On the collection settings, we specified all session limits as "never". Still all users are logged off 6 hours after their session got disconnected (found this in the eventlog).
I've created a GPO which also sets the session limits to never (computer configuration), but this also didn't help. Sessions are still logged of 6 hours after disconnection
I checked the registry, and the keys are correct:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREPoliciesMicrosoftWindows NTTerminal Services]
"MaxDisconnectionTime"=dword:00000000
"MaxIdleTime"=dword:00000000
"MaxConnectionTime"=dword:00000000
"fResetBroken"=dword:00000000
I also checked the user objects in AD, and on the users the "session" tab also states "never" on all settings.
Next I checked the RD Gateway policies, but also there, no limits specified...
This happens on all users logging in to the RDS.
Is there any other place where session limits can be set?
EDIT: screenshots of settings:
Collection:
User:
GPO:
Gateway policies:
remote-desktop-services windows-server-2016 session
remote-desktop-services windows-server-2016 session
edited Sep 13 '17 at 12:57
Mickeybyte
asked Sep 13 '17 at 7:18
MickeybyteMickeybyte
36129
36129
You sure the GPOs get applied correctly? Does some local security policy override your settings maybe? Please specify what you mean by "all settings", maybe you did forget to set some.
– Lenniey
Sep 13 '17 at 7:31
I've added screenshots of the settings
– Mickeybyte
Sep 13 '17 at 12:58
There should be at least two computer configuration policies, try to set them, too
– Lenniey
Sep 14 '17 at 7:55
Sorry for the late reply. What do you mean by 2 computer policies? I know only of one, the one which is shown in the screenshot above.
– Mickeybyte
Oct 9 '17 at 6:55
Just got informed by our customer that the issue has been solved. I have no idea what happened, but it seems the above settings took some "days" before getting applied (although server was rebooted and GPO's where manually applied).
– Mickeybyte
Oct 9 '17 at 8:06
add a comment |
You sure the GPOs get applied correctly? Does some local security policy override your settings maybe? Please specify what you mean by "all settings", maybe you did forget to set some.
– Lenniey
Sep 13 '17 at 7:31
I've added screenshots of the settings
– Mickeybyte
Sep 13 '17 at 12:58
There should be at least two computer configuration policies, try to set them, too
– Lenniey
Sep 14 '17 at 7:55
Sorry for the late reply. What do you mean by 2 computer policies? I know only of one, the one which is shown in the screenshot above.
– Mickeybyte
Oct 9 '17 at 6:55
Just got informed by our customer that the issue has been solved. I have no idea what happened, but it seems the above settings took some "days" before getting applied (although server was rebooted and GPO's where manually applied).
– Mickeybyte
Oct 9 '17 at 8:06
You sure the GPOs get applied correctly? Does some local security policy override your settings maybe? Please specify what you mean by "all settings", maybe you did forget to set some.
– Lenniey
Sep 13 '17 at 7:31
You sure the GPOs get applied correctly? Does some local security policy override your settings maybe? Please specify what you mean by "all settings", maybe you did forget to set some.
– Lenniey
Sep 13 '17 at 7:31
I've added screenshots of the settings
– Mickeybyte
Sep 13 '17 at 12:58
I've added screenshots of the settings
– Mickeybyte
Sep 13 '17 at 12:58
There should be at least two computer configuration policies, try to set them, too
– Lenniey
Sep 14 '17 at 7:55
There should be at least two computer configuration policies, try to set them, too
– Lenniey
Sep 14 '17 at 7:55
Sorry for the late reply. What do you mean by 2 computer policies? I know only of one, the one which is shown in the screenshot above.
– Mickeybyte
Oct 9 '17 at 6:55
Sorry for the late reply. What do you mean by 2 computer policies? I know only of one, the one which is shown in the screenshot above.
– Mickeybyte
Oct 9 '17 at 6:55
Just got informed by our customer that the issue has been solved. I have no idea what happened, but it seems the above settings took some "days" before getting applied (although server was rebooted and GPO's where manually applied).
– Mickeybyte
Oct 9 '17 at 8:06
Just got informed by our customer that the issue has been solved. I have no idea what happened, but it seems the above settings took some "days" before getting applied (although server was rebooted and GPO's where manually applied).
– Mickeybyte
Oct 9 '17 at 8:06
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Issuing gpupdate /force will make sure the GPO policies are applied to every system affected. The "delay" you mention seems an indication this was not used.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f873399%2frds-2016-session-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Issuing gpupdate /force will make sure the GPO policies are applied to every system affected. The "delay" you mention seems an indication this was not used.
New contributor
add a comment |
Issuing gpupdate /force will make sure the GPO policies are applied to every system affected. The "delay" you mention seems an indication this was not used.
New contributor
add a comment |
Issuing gpupdate /force will make sure the GPO policies are applied to every system affected. The "delay" you mention seems an indication this was not used.
New contributor
Issuing gpupdate /force will make sure the GPO policies are applied to every system affected. The "delay" you mention seems an indication this was not used.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 8 mins ago
ShotgunPRShotgunPR
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f873399%2frds-2016-session-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You sure the GPOs get applied correctly? Does some local security policy override your settings maybe? Please specify what you mean by "all settings", maybe you did forget to set some.
– Lenniey
Sep 13 '17 at 7:31
I've added screenshots of the settings
– Mickeybyte
Sep 13 '17 at 12:58
There should be at least two computer configuration policies, try to set them, too
– Lenniey
Sep 14 '17 at 7:55
Sorry for the late reply. What do you mean by 2 computer policies? I know only of one, the one which is shown in the screenshot above.
– Mickeybyte
Oct 9 '17 at 6:55
Just got informed by our customer that the issue has been solved. I have no idea what happened, but it seems the above settings took some "days" before getting applied (although server was rebooted and GPO's where manually applied).
– Mickeybyte
Oct 9 '17 at 8:06