Notation for two qubit composite product state Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019...
What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?
How does modal jazz use chord progressions?
Cold is to Refrigerator as warm is to?
Is it possible to ask for a hotel room without minibar/extra services?
Why is "Captain Marvel" translated as male in Portugal?
Passing functions in C++
What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?
Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?
Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?
What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?
I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign
What to do with post with dry rot?
How should I respond to a player wanting to catch a sword between their hands?
Determine whether f is a function, an injection, a surjection
Using "nakedly" instead of "with nothing on"
Blender game recording at the wrong time
What kind of display is this?
Biased dice probability question
Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?
Slither Like a Snake
Why does this iterative way of solving of equation work?
Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?
How to rotate it perfectly?
How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?
Notation for two qubit composite product state
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Compute average value of two-qubit systemWhat can I deduce about $f(x)$ if $f$ is balanced or constant?What does the notation $lvert underline{x} rangle$ mean?How do I show that a two-qubit state is an entangled state?How is a single qubit fundamentally different from a classical coin spinning in the air?Why is the state of multiple qubits given by their tensor product?Notation for two entangled registersA question about notation for quantum statesA two qubit state in a special formConcurrence for a two qubit state
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
In my lecture notes on quantum information processing my lecturer gives an example of composite systems as $|phirangle=|0rangle |0rangle=|00rangle$. I understand that if we have two qubits then its product state will be in 2n dimensional Hilbert space and I understand the 2 qubit state $|00rangle$ to be represented in matrix representation as $begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}$ (if that is wrong please do correct my misunderstanding though). My question is about the notation $|0rangle|0rangle=|00rangle$, how can we calculate this with matrices on the left-hand side we have a 2 by 1 matrix multiplied by a 2 by 1 matrix which cannot be calculated. I thought perhaps it was a matter of direct products but my calculation led to an incorrect result there too.
Could anyone clarify this for me, please?
Edit: It occurred to me that I think I'm mistaken about the matrix representation of $|00rangle$, I think it would make more sense to be $begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0\0\0 end{pmatrix}$ in which case the direct product does work and I should take the notation $|0rangle|0rangle$ to be a shorthand for the direct product not the multiplication of two matrices, is that correct?
quantum-state tensor-product notation
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my lecture notes on quantum information processing my lecturer gives an example of composite systems as $|phirangle=|0rangle |0rangle=|00rangle$. I understand that if we have two qubits then its product state will be in 2n dimensional Hilbert space and I understand the 2 qubit state $|00rangle$ to be represented in matrix representation as $begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}$ (if that is wrong please do correct my misunderstanding though). My question is about the notation $|0rangle|0rangle=|00rangle$, how can we calculate this with matrices on the left-hand side we have a 2 by 1 matrix multiplied by a 2 by 1 matrix which cannot be calculated. I thought perhaps it was a matter of direct products but my calculation led to an incorrect result there too.
Could anyone clarify this for me, please?
Edit: It occurred to me that I think I'm mistaken about the matrix representation of $|00rangle$, I think it would make more sense to be $begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0\0\0 end{pmatrix}$ in which case the direct product does work and I should take the notation $|0rangle|0rangle$ to be a shorthand for the direct product not the multiplication of two matrices, is that correct?
quantum-state tensor-product notation
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my lecture notes on quantum information processing my lecturer gives an example of composite systems as $|phirangle=|0rangle |0rangle=|00rangle$. I understand that if we have two qubits then its product state will be in 2n dimensional Hilbert space and I understand the 2 qubit state $|00rangle$ to be represented in matrix representation as $begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}$ (if that is wrong please do correct my misunderstanding though). My question is about the notation $|0rangle|0rangle=|00rangle$, how can we calculate this with matrices on the left-hand side we have a 2 by 1 matrix multiplied by a 2 by 1 matrix which cannot be calculated. I thought perhaps it was a matter of direct products but my calculation led to an incorrect result there too.
Could anyone clarify this for me, please?
Edit: It occurred to me that I think I'm mistaken about the matrix representation of $|00rangle$, I think it would make more sense to be $begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0\0\0 end{pmatrix}$ in which case the direct product does work and I should take the notation $|0rangle|0rangle$ to be a shorthand for the direct product not the multiplication of two matrices, is that correct?
quantum-state tensor-product notation
New contributor
$endgroup$
In my lecture notes on quantum information processing my lecturer gives an example of composite systems as $|phirangle=|0rangle |0rangle=|00rangle$. I understand that if we have two qubits then its product state will be in 2n dimensional Hilbert space and I understand the 2 qubit state $|00rangle$ to be represented in matrix representation as $begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}$ (if that is wrong please do correct my misunderstanding though). My question is about the notation $|0rangle|0rangle=|00rangle$, how can we calculate this with matrices on the left-hand side we have a 2 by 1 matrix multiplied by a 2 by 1 matrix which cannot be calculated. I thought perhaps it was a matter of direct products but my calculation led to an incorrect result there too.
Could anyone clarify this for me, please?
Edit: It occurred to me that I think I'm mistaken about the matrix representation of $|00rangle$, I think it would make more sense to be $begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0\0\0 end{pmatrix}$ in which case the direct product does work and I should take the notation $|0rangle|0rangle$ to be a shorthand for the direct product not the multiplication of two matrices, is that correct?
quantum-state tensor-product notation
quantum-state tensor-product notation
New contributor
New contributor
edited 3 hours ago
Sanchayan Dutta♦
6,67641556
6,67641556
New contributor
asked 5 hours ago
can'tcauchycan'tcauchy
1185
1185
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$|0rangle|0rangle$ is actually a shorthand for $|0rangle otimes |0rangle$ or $begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0 end{bmatrix} otimes begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0end{bmatrix} $ where $otimes$ stands for the tensor product or essentially the Kronecker product. To quote Wikipedia:
In mathematics, the Kronecker product, denoted by $otimes$, is an operation
on two matrices of arbitrary size resulting in a block matrix. It is a
generalization of the outer product (which is denoted by the same
symbol) from vectors to matrices, and gives the matrix of the tensor
product with respect to a standard choice of basis. The Kronecker
product should not be confused with the usual matrix multiplication,
which is an entirely different operation.
Now the standard choice of basis for a two-qubit system is:
${|00rangle = begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 end{bmatrix}, |01rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 \ 1 \ 0 \ 0 end{bmatrix}, |10rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 1 \ 0 end{bmatrix}, |11rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 1 end{bmatrix}}$
If you wish, you can also represent the basis as (if you strictly take $otimes$ as the outer product):
${|00rangle = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}, |01rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}, |10rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 1 & 0 end{bmatrix}, |11rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix}}$
but then while carrying out calculations like determining the action of a quantum gate on a composite state you'd have to write the state using the vector representation (carefully read the linked Mathematics SE answer).
The key point here is that don't be bent on thinking of these linear algebraic operations in terms of matrices, but rather think in terms of linear maps. You'll get more comfortable with these things once you learn about tensors!
P.S: Kronecker product and outer product confusion
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "694"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5911%2fnotation-for-two-qubit-composite-product-state%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$|0rangle|0rangle$ is actually a shorthand for $|0rangle otimes |0rangle$ or $begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0 end{bmatrix} otimes begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0end{bmatrix} $ where $otimes$ stands for the tensor product or essentially the Kronecker product. To quote Wikipedia:
In mathematics, the Kronecker product, denoted by $otimes$, is an operation
on two matrices of arbitrary size resulting in a block matrix. It is a
generalization of the outer product (which is denoted by the same
symbol) from vectors to matrices, and gives the matrix of the tensor
product with respect to a standard choice of basis. The Kronecker
product should not be confused with the usual matrix multiplication,
which is an entirely different operation.
Now the standard choice of basis for a two-qubit system is:
${|00rangle = begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 end{bmatrix}, |01rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 \ 1 \ 0 \ 0 end{bmatrix}, |10rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 1 \ 0 end{bmatrix}, |11rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 1 end{bmatrix}}$
If you wish, you can also represent the basis as (if you strictly take $otimes$ as the outer product):
${|00rangle = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}, |01rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}, |10rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 1 & 0 end{bmatrix}, |11rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix}}$
but then while carrying out calculations like determining the action of a quantum gate on a composite state you'd have to write the state using the vector representation (carefully read the linked Mathematics SE answer).
The key point here is that don't be bent on thinking of these linear algebraic operations in terms of matrices, but rather think in terms of linear maps. You'll get more comfortable with these things once you learn about tensors!
P.S: Kronecker product and outer product confusion
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$|0rangle|0rangle$ is actually a shorthand for $|0rangle otimes |0rangle$ or $begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0 end{bmatrix} otimes begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0end{bmatrix} $ where $otimes$ stands for the tensor product or essentially the Kronecker product. To quote Wikipedia:
In mathematics, the Kronecker product, denoted by $otimes$, is an operation
on two matrices of arbitrary size resulting in a block matrix. It is a
generalization of the outer product (which is denoted by the same
symbol) from vectors to matrices, and gives the matrix of the tensor
product with respect to a standard choice of basis. The Kronecker
product should not be confused with the usual matrix multiplication,
which is an entirely different operation.
Now the standard choice of basis for a two-qubit system is:
${|00rangle = begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 end{bmatrix}, |01rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 \ 1 \ 0 \ 0 end{bmatrix}, |10rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 1 \ 0 end{bmatrix}, |11rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 1 end{bmatrix}}$
If you wish, you can also represent the basis as (if you strictly take $otimes$ as the outer product):
${|00rangle = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}, |01rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}, |10rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 1 & 0 end{bmatrix}, |11rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix}}$
but then while carrying out calculations like determining the action of a quantum gate on a composite state you'd have to write the state using the vector representation (carefully read the linked Mathematics SE answer).
The key point here is that don't be bent on thinking of these linear algebraic operations in terms of matrices, but rather think in terms of linear maps. You'll get more comfortable with these things once you learn about tensors!
P.S: Kronecker product and outer product confusion
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$|0rangle|0rangle$ is actually a shorthand for $|0rangle otimes |0rangle$ or $begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0 end{bmatrix} otimes begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0end{bmatrix} $ where $otimes$ stands for the tensor product or essentially the Kronecker product. To quote Wikipedia:
In mathematics, the Kronecker product, denoted by $otimes$, is an operation
on two matrices of arbitrary size resulting in a block matrix. It is a
generalization of the outer product (which is denoted by the same
symbol) from vectors to matrices, and gives the matrix of the tensor
product with respect to a standard choice of basis. The Kronecker
product should not be confused with the usual matrix multiplication,
which is an entirely different operation.
Now the standard choice of basis for a two-qubit system is:
${|00rangle = begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 end{bmatrix}, |01rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 \ 1 \ 0 \ 0 end{bmatrix}, |10rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 1 \ 0 end{bmatrix}, |11rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 1 end{bmatrix}}$
If you wish, you can also represent the basis as (if you strictly take $otimes$ as the outer product):
${|00rangle = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}, |01rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}, |10rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 1 & 0 end{bmatrix}, |11rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix}}$
but then while carrying out calculations like determining the action of a quantum gate on a composite state you'd have to write the state using the vector representation (carefully read the linked Mathematics SE answer).
The key point here is that don't be bent on thinking of these linear algebraic operations in terms of matrices, but rather think in terms of linear maps. You'll get more comfortable with these things once you learn about tensors!
P.S: Kronecker product and outer product confusion
$endgroup$
$|0rangle|0rangle$ is actually a shorthand for $|0rangle otimes |0rangle$ or $begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0 end{bmatrix} otimes begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0end{bmatrix} $ where $otimes$ stands for the tensor product or essentially the Kronecker product. To quote Wikipedia:
In mathematics, the Kronecker product, denoted by $otimes$, is an operation
on two matrices of arbitrary size resulting in a block matrix. It is a
generalization of the outer product (which is denoted by the same
symbol) from vectors to matrices, and gives the matrix of the tensor
product with respect to a standard choice of basis. The Kronecker
product should not be confused with the usual matrix multiplication,
which is an entirely different operation.
Now the standard choice of basis for a two-qubit system is:
${|00rangle = begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 end{bmatrix}, |01rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 \ 1 \ 0 \ 0 end{bmatrix}, |10rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 1 \ 0 end{bmatrix}, |11rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 1 end{bmatrix}}$
If you wish, you can also represent the basis as (if you strictly take $otimes$ as the outer product):
${|00rangle = begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}, |01rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{bmatrix}, |10rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 1 & 0 end{bmatrix}, |11rangle = begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{bmatrix}}$
but then while carrying out calculations like determining the action of a quantum gate on a composite state you'd have to write the state using the vector representation (carefully read the linked Mathematics SE answer).
The key point here is that don't be bent on thinking of these linear algebraic operations in terms of matrices, but rather think in terms of linear maps. You'll get more comfortable with these things once you learn about tensors!
P.S: Kronecker product and outer product confusion
edited 4 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
Sanchayan Dutta♦Sanchayan Dutta
6,67641556
6,67641556
add a comment |
add a comment |
can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5911%2fnotation-for-two-qubit-composite-product-state%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown