Who must act to prevent Brexit on March 29th?Can the Government enact the withdrawal bill without...

What to do when my ideas aren't chosen, when I strongly disagree with the chosen solution?

How to prevent YouTube from showing already watched videos?

Why are all the doors on Ferenginar (the Ferengi home world) far shorter than the average Ferengi?

The most efficient algorithm to find all possible integer pairs which sum to a given integer

Is it okay / does it make sense for another player to join a running game of Munchkin?

Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?

What is the term when two people sing in harmony, but they aren't singing the same notes?

Indicating multiple different modes of speech (fantasy language or telepathy)

Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?

The One-Electron Universe postulate is true - what simple change can I make to change the whole universe?

What (else) happened July 1st 1858 in London?

Meta programming: Declare a new struct on the fly

Is it possible to build a CPA Secure encryption scheme which remains secure even when the encryption of secret key is given?

Is there any significance to the Valyrian Stone vault door of Qarth?

Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?

How can I raise concerns with a new DM about XP splitting?

Adding empty element to declared container without declaring type of element

For airliners, what prevents wing strikes on landing in bad weather?

I2C signal and power over long range (10meter cable)

Latex for-and in equation

A known event to a history junkie

Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?

Have I saved too much for retirement so far?

What would you call a finite collection of unordered objects that are not necessarily distinct?



Who must act to prevent Brexit on March 29th?


Can the Government enact the withdrawal bill without parliament's approval?Must the UK leave the EU?Why has Article 50 of Brexit not been enabled yet?Will the British Parliament prevent “Brexit”?What mechanisms exist to prevent “hard” Brexit?Why is the British government waiting until March 29th to officially Brexit?Could the Queen have stopped Brexit?Who made this comment about Brexit and in what context?Did the EU Referendum Act 2015 mandate “the leaflet”?Could the UK unilaterally “restart the clock” on Brexit?What will happen if Parliament votes “no” on each of the Brexit-related votes to be held on the 12th, 13th and 14th of March?













2















As I understand it, the EU27 leadership made the UK a conditional offer with various options to extend the Article 50 negotiation period. Who has to act to accept and enact the extension?




  • Can the UK government accept it on behalf of the UK or do they legally need an act of parliament first?


  • Once the UK selects one option, do the EU27 governments have to formally accept it or has this acceptance been given in advance? Do any of the EU27 governments need parliamentary approval before they can act?


  • Can this be done by phone or does it require physical letters which must be delivered and accepted?











share|improve this question




















  • 1





    It's not precisely a conditional offer. The extension until the 12th April is "free", after that there are conditions.

    – origimbo
    1 hour ago
















2















As I understand it, the EU27 leadership made the UK a conditional offer with various options to extend the Article 50 negotiation period. Who has to act to accept and enact the extension?




  • Can the UK government accept it on behalf of the UK or do they legally need an act of parliament first?


  • Once the UK selects one option, do the EU27 governments have to formally accept it or has this acceptance been given in advance? Do any of the EU27 governments need parliamentary approval before they can act?


  • Can this be done by phone or does it require physical letters which must be delivered and accepted?











share|improve this question




















  • 1





    It's not precisely a conditional offer. The extension until the 12th April is "free", after that there are conditions.

    – origimbo
    1 hour ago














2












2








2








As I understand it, the EU27 leadership made the UK a conditional offer with various options to extend the Article 50 negotiation period. Who has to act to accept and enact the extension?




  • Can the UK government accept it on behalf of the UK or do they legally need an act of parliament first?


  • Once the UK selects one option, do the EU27 governments have to formally accept it or has this acceptance been given in advance? Do any of the EU27 governments need parliamentary approval before they can act?


  • Can this be done by phone or does it require physical letters which must be delivered and accepted?











share|improve this question
















As I understand it, the EU27 leadership made the UK a conditional offer with various options to extend the Article 50 negotiation period. Who has to act to accept and enact the extension?




  • Can the UK government accept it on behalf of the UK or do they legally need an act of parliament first?


  • Once the UK selects one option, do the EU27 governments have to formally accept it or has this acceptance been given in advance? Do any of the EU27 governments need parliamentary approval before they can act?


  • Can this be done by phone or does it require physical letters which must be delivered and accepted?








united-kingdom brexit article-50






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









JJJ

4,98622144




4,98622144










asked 3 hours ago









o.m.o.m.

10.1k11840




10.1k11840








  • 1





    It's not precisely a conditional offer. The extension until the 12th April is "free", after that there are conditions.

    – origimbo
    1 hour ago














  • 1





    It's not precisely a conditional offer. The extension until the 12th April is "free", after that there are conditions.

    – origimbo
    1 hour ago








1




1





It's not precisely a conditional offer. The extension until the 12th April is "free", after that there are conditions.

– origimbo
1 hour ago





It's not precisely a conditional offer. The extension until the 12th April is "free", after that there are conditions.

– origimbo
1 hour ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














The European Council has already agreed to both dates so they don’t need to ratify anything any more.



A new UK Act isn’t required. The UK Government can put forward a Statutory Instrument to amend the existing Withdrawal Act. This does need to pass both Houses of Parliament but this is unlikely to be blocked.



In both cases, confirmation in writing will be given but that’s just a formality.



Which date applies depends on whether the Withdrawal Agreement bill is passed by the UK Parliament.



If it is then a May 22nd date will apply to allow all the necessary legislation to be passed.



If not then the UK Government have till April 11th to come up with a new plan or the UK will leave without a deal.






share|improve this answer
























  • Isn't it April 12th?

    – Denis de Bernardy
    1 hour ago



















2














The need an act of parliament. No so much because the change in the withdrawal act, but because they made a law in the UK which mentions that the UK will leave the EU on March 29. That law needs to be withdrawn or modified. It's unclear ("legal confusion" below) what happens if parliament rejects this.



The BBC has a nice graph:



Brexit: Next steps






share|improve this answer
























  • It's also fantastically unlikely that they will reject it after specifically voting for an extension in the first place, and voting against a No Deal outcome.

    – Kevin
    40 mins ago











  • Do not assume that politician's decisions or votes follow logic or are in any way consistent.

    – Aganju
    12 mins ago



















0














Note that unilateral revocation by simple letter of the Prime Minister remains an option.



(I believe that since the Electronic Communications Act email counts as "in writing" for all cases where that is legally required. I don't know if international agreements have to be in writing because this kind of temporal brinksmanship rarely comes up)






share|improve this answer
























  • -1 Prime Minister May cannot do this on her own. See politics.stackexchange.com/a/37805/8912

    – Sjoerd
    2 mins ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39806%2fwho-must-act-to-prevent-brexit-on-march-29th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














The European Council has already agreed to both dates so they don’t need to ratify anything any more.



A new UK Act isn’t required. The UK Government can put forward a Statutory Instrument to amend the existing Withdrawal Act. This does need to pass both Houses of Parliament but this is unlikely to be blocked.



In both cases, confirmation in writing will be given but that’s just a formality.



Which date applies depends on whether the Withdrawal Agreement bill is passed by the UK Parliament.



If it is then a May 22nd date will apply to allow all the necessary legislation to be passed.



If not then the UK Government have till April 11th to come up with a new plan or the UK will leave without a deal.






share|improve this answer
























  • Isn't it April 12th?

    – Denis de Bernardy
    1 hour ago
















3














The European Council has already agreed to both dates so they don’t need to ratify anything any more.



A new UK Act isn’t required. The UK Government can put forward a Statutory Instrument to amend the existing Withdrawal Act. This does need to pass both Houses of Parliament but this is unlikely to be blocked.



In both cases, confirmation in writing will be given but that’s just a formality.



Which date applies depends on whether the Withdrawal Agreement bill is passed by the UK Parliament.



If it is then a May 22nd date will apply to allow all the necessary legislation to be passed.



If not then the UK Government have till April 11th to come up with a new plan or the UK will leave without a deal.






share|improve this answer
























  • Isn't it April 12th?

    – Denis de Bernardy
    1 hour ago














3












3








3







The European Council has already agreed to both dates so they don’t need to ratify anything any more.



A new UK Act isn’t required. The UK Government can put forward a Statutory Instrument to amend the existing Withdrawal Act. This does need to pass both Houses of Parliament but this is unlikely to be blocked.



In both cases, confirmation in writing will be given but that’s just a formality.



Which date applies depends on whether the Withdrawal Agreement bill is passed by the UK Parliament.



If it is then a May 22nd date will apply to allow all the necessary legislation to be passed.



If not then the UK Government have till April 11th to come up with a new plan or the UK will leave without a deal.






share|improve this answer













The European Council has already agreed to both dates so they don’t need to ratify anything any more.



A new UK Act isn’t required. The UK Government can put forward a Statutory Instrument to amend the existing Withdrawal Act. This does need to pass both Houses of Parliament but this is unlikely to be blocked.



In both cases, confirmation in writing will be given but that’s just a formality.



Which date applies depends on whether the Withdrawal Agreement bill is passed by the UK Parliament.



If it is then a May 22nd date will apply to allow all the necessary legislation to be passed.



If not then the UK Government have till April 11th to come up with a new plan or the UK will leave without a deal.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 hours ago









AlexAlex

4,1551120




4,1551120













  • Isn't it April 12th?

    – Denis de Bernardy
    1 hour ago



















  • Isn't it April 12th?

    – Denis de Bernardy
    1 hour ago

















Isn't it April 12th?

– Denis de Bernardy
1 hour ago





Isn't it April 12th?

– Denis de Bernardy
1 hour ago











2














The need an act of parliament. No so much because the change in the withdrawal act, but because they made a law in the UK which mentions that the UK will leave the EU on March 29. That law needs to be withdrawn or modified. It's unclear ("legal confusion" below) what happens if parliament rejects this.



The BBC has a nice graph:



Brexit: Next steps






share|improve this answer
























  • It's also fantastically unlikely that they will reject it after specifically voting for an extension in the first place, and voting against a No Deal outcome.

    – Kevin
    40 mins ago











  • Do not assume that politician's decisions or votes follow logic or are in any way consistent.

    – Aganju
    12 mins ago
















2














The need an act of parliament. No so much because the change in the withdrawal act, but because they made a law in the UK which mentions that the UK will leave the EU on March 29. That law needs to be withdrawn or modified. It's unclear ("legal confusion" below) what happens if parliament rejects this.



The BBC has a nice graph:



Brexit: Next steps






share|improve this answer
























  • It's also fantastically unlikely that they will reject it after specifically voting for an extension in the first place, and voting against a No Deal outcome.

    – Kevin
    40 mins ago











  • Do not assume that politician's decisions or votes follow logic or are in any way consistent.

    – Aganju
    12 mins ago














2












2








2







The need an act of parliament. No so much because the change in the withdrawal act, but because they made a law in the UK which mentions that the UK will leave the EU on March 29. That law needs to be withdrawn or modified. It's unclear ("legal confusion" below) what happens if parliament rejects this.



The BBC has a nice graph:



Brexit: Next steps






share|improve this answer













The need an act of parliament. No so much because the change in the withdrawal act, but because they made a law in the UK which mentions that the UK will leave the EU on March 29. That law needs to be withdrawn or modified. It's unclear ("legal confusion" below) what happens if parliament rejects this.



The BBC has a nice graph:



Brexit: Next steps







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 hours ago









AbigailAbigail

1,900413




1,900413













  • It's also fantastically unlikely that they will reject it after specifically voting for an extension in the first place, and voting against a No Deal outcome.

    – Kevin
    40 mins ago











  • Do not assume that politician's decisions or votes follow logic or are in any way consistent.

    – Aganju
    12 mins ago



















  • It's also fantastically unlikely that they will reject it after specifically voting for an extension in the first place, and voting against a No Deal outcome.

    – Kevin
    40 mins ago











  • Do not assume that politician's decisions or votes follow logic or are in any way consistent.

    – Aganju
    12 mins ago

















It's also fantastically unlikely that they will reject it after specifically voting for an extension in the first place, and voting against a No Deal outcome.

– Kevin
40 mins ago





It's also fantastically unlikely that they will reject it after specifically voting for an extension in the first place, and voting against a No Deal outcome.

– Kevin
40 mins ago













Do not assume that politician's decisions or votes follow logic or are in any way consistent.

– Aganju
12 mins ago





Do not assume that politician's decisions or votes follow logic or are in any way consistent.

– Aganju
12 mins ago











0














Note that unilateral revocation by simple letter of the Prime Minister remains an option.



(I believe that since the Electronic Communications Act email counts as "in writing" for all cases where that is legally required. I don't know if international agreements have to be in writing because this kind of temporal brinksmanship rarely comes up)






share|improve this answer
























  • -1 Prime Minister May cannot do this on her own. See politics.stackexchange.com/a/37805/8912

    – Sjoerd
    2 mins ago
















0














Note that unilateral revocation by simple letter of the Prime Minister remains an option.



(I believe that since the Electronic Communications Act email counts as "in writing" for all cases where that is legally required. I don't know if international agreements have to be in writing because this kind of temporal brinksmanship rarely comes up)






share|improve this answer
























  • -1 Prime Minister May cannot do this on her own. See politics.stackexchange.com/a/37805/8912

    – Sjoerd
    2 mins ago














0












0








0







Note that unilateral revocation by simple letter of the Prime Minister remains an option.



(I believe that since the Electronic Communications Act email counts as "in writing" for all cases where that is legally required. I don't know if international agreements have to be in writing because this kind of temporal brinksmanship rarely comes up)






share|improve this answer













Note that unilateral revocation by simple letter of the Prime Minister remains an option.



(I believe that since the Electronic Communications Act email counts as "in writing" for all cases where that is legally required. I don't know if international agreements have to be in writing because this kind of temporal brinksmanship rarely comes up)







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









pjc50pjc50

6,89911532




6,89911532













  • -1 Prime Minister May cannot do this on her own. See politics.stackexchange.com/a/37805/8912

    – Sjoerd
    2 mins ago



















  • -1 Prime Minister May cannot do this on her own. See politics.stackexchange.com/a/37805/8912

    – Sjoerd
    2 mins ago

















-1 Prime Minister May cannot do this on her own. See politics.stackexchange.com/a/37805/8912

– Sjoerd
2 mins ago





-1 Prime Minister May cannot do this on her own. See politics.stackexchange.com/a/37805/8912

– Sjoerd
2 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39806%2fwho-must-act-to-prevent-brexit-on-march-29th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

117736 Шеррод Примітки | Див. також | Посилання | Навігаційне...

As a Security Precaution, the user account has been locked The Next CEO of Stack OverflowMS...

Маріан Котлеба Зміст Життєпис | Політичні погляди |...