Bring Crashed/Degraded RAID when Data is intact but Disk Dropped (btrfs/Synology)How do I get mdadm to auto...

Six real numbers so that product of any five is the sixth one

Difference between 'stomach' and 'uterus'

Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?

When was drinking water recognized as crucial in marathon running?

Would the melodic leap of the opening phrase of Mozart's K545 be considered dissonant?

Is it possible to make a clamp function shorter than a ternary in JS?

Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?

Plagiarism of code by other PhD student

Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

Can a space-faring robot still function over a billion years?

What type of investment is best suited for a 1-year investment on a down payment?

For the Kanji 校 is the fifth stroke connected to the sixth stroke?

"Lived a lion" or "there lived a lion"

Can throughput exceed the bandwidth of a network

Levi-Civita symbol: 3D matrix

Non-Italian European mafias in USA?

Giving a talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?

What happened to QGIS 2.x LTR?

Why can't we make a perpetual motion machine by using a magnet to pull up a piece of metal, then letting it fall back down?

Where is the line between being obedient and getting bullied by a boss?

Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?

Is there a full canon version of Tyrion's jackass/honeycomb joke?



Bring Crashed/Degraded RAID when Data is intact but Disk Dropped (btrfs/Synology)


How do I get mdadm to auto assemble my raid array?Linux Raid: mystical md_d devicemdadm raid5 failure. set wrong drive to faulty by accidentMissing 2 Disk out of software RAID 5mdadm: drive replacement shows up as spare and refuses to syncSoftware RAID 1 does not extend on two new additional drivesHow to fix my broken raid10 arraymdadm RAID6, recover 2 disk failure during reshapeRestore data from lost partition after raid synchronizationRAID10 - Clean, degraded - Missing disk













0















The Volume on my Synology Expansion crashed and can't recover on its own.




Drive is probably OK. It happen after cleaning the device from dust. Until that time Volume
was also OK so I believe it isn't because of failed drive. When Starting up after cleaning, system dropped one disk and this is current state. What is weird it shows the Volume as CRASHED instead of DEGRADED.




Desktop Panel on Synology is showing that volume exists but Used space of 0 bytes and Available of 1 byte and it is not visible in Shared Folders.



I'm using Synology DS719+ (DSM 6.2-23739) with DX513 Expansion, which is populated with 5x 10TB IronWolfs having 1 Volume of SHR (1-drive failure tolerance, BTRFS) beyond separate volume, on two disks on main device (DS).



Storage Manager is showing that one drive is Not Initialized. I ran SMART and IronWolf Health Test on it and as far as tool is concerned the disk is fine.



Storage Manager log is showing that an I/O error has occured.



I found similar problem on a Synology Forum - [here][1]



As @voodooking* advised I run:



fdisk -l
cat /proc/mdstat

Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md4 : active raid1 sdb7[2] sda7[1]
4883750912 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
md3 : active raid1 sda6[3] sdb6[2]
488366912 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
md2 : active raid1 sdb5[2] sda5[3]
483555456 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
md6 : active raid5 sdca5[3] sdcd5[4] sdcc5[5] sdcb5[1]
39046395904 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/4] [UUUU_]
md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1]
2097088 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md0 : active raid1 sda1[1] sdb1[0]
2490176 blocks [2/2] [UU]


To find a problematic disk and match it by serial number from Storage Manager I ran:



hdparm -I /dev/sd???
mdadm --detail /dev/md6

/dev/md6:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Fri Sep 2 14:35:22 2016
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 39046395904 (37237.54 GiB 39983.51 GB)
Used Dev Size : 9761598976 (9309.39 GiB 9995.88 GB)
Raid Devices : 5
Total Devices : 4
Persistence : Superblock is persistent

Update Time : Sun Mar 3 19:41:51 2019
State : clean, degraded
Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 4
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0

Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Name : Blade:6 (local to host Blade)
UUID : 5c453f27:136ff82b:1b81964a:19d75973
Events : 478796

Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
3 68 229 0 active sync /dev/sdca5
1 68 245 1 active sync /dev/sdcb5
5 69 5 2 active sync /dev/sdcc5
4 69 21 3 active sync /dev/sdcd5
- 0 0 4 removed


and found that in my case not initialized partition is /dev/sdce5 so I ran:



mdadm --manage /dev/md6 --add /dev/sdce5


I check the status with:



cat /proc/mdstat



[>....................] recovery = 0.0% (0/9761598976) finish=274544971.2min speed=0K/sec


And after about a minute or so it has ended (something went wrong). I run mdstat again and It was showing 5 drives but with (F) next to added drive. I rebooted and drive was still dropped from array and stay in not initialised state.



Storage Manager is showing Repair Option but with volume size of 1 bytes I don't know what will be the result of such repair (rebuild) - it will wipe out data from not initialised disk for sure, which maybe attached by some commands again without rebuild. Moreover such rebuild will take 10 days and It maybe not unnecessary extra strain on a drive.



Without this drive, SHR Volume with 1-drive failure tolerance, should work normally and be in DEGRADED state, so what can be wrong?



How to bring this Volume to Normal State?









share







New contributor




otakon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    0















    The Volume on my Synology Expansion crashed and can't recover on its own.




    Drive is probably OK. It happen after cleaning the device from dust. Until that time Volume
    was also OK so I believe it isn't because of failed drive. When Starting up after cleaning, system dropped one disk and this is current state. What is weird it shows the Volume as CRASHED instead of DEGRADED.




    Desktop Panel on Synology is showing that volume exists but Used space of 0 bytes and Available of 1 byte and it is not visible in Shared Folders.



    I'm using Synology DS719+ (DSM 6.2-23739) with DX513 Expansion, which is populated with 5x 10TB IronWolfs having 1 Volume of SHR (1-drive failure tolerance, BTRFS) beyond separate volume, on two disks on main device (DS).



    Storage Manager is showing that one drive is Not Initialized. I ran SMART and IronWolf Health Test on it and as far as tool is concerned the disk is fine.



    Storage Manager log is showing that an I/O error has occured.



    I found similar problem on a Synology Forum - [here][1]



    As @voodooking* advised I run:



    fdisk -l
    cat /proc/mdstat

    Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
    md4 : active raid1 sdb7[2] sda7[1]
    4883750912 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
    md3 : active raid1 sda6[3] sdb6[2]
    488366912 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
    md2 : active raid1 sdb5[2] sda5[3]
    483555456 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
    md6 : active raid5 sdca5[3] sdcd5[4] sdcc5[5] sdcb5[1]
    39046395904 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/4] [UUUU_]
    md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1]
    2097088 blocks [2/2] [UU]
    md0 : active raid1 sda1[1] sdb1[0]
    2490176 blocks [2/2] [UU]


    To find a problematic disk and match it by serial number from Storage Manager I ran:



    hdparm -I /dev/sd???
    mdadm --detail /dev/md6

    /dev/md6:
    Version : 1.2
    Creation Time : Fri Sep 2 14:35:22 2016
    Raid Level : raid5
    Array Size : 39046395904 (37237.54 GiB 39983.51 GB)
    Used Dev Size : 9761598976 (9309.39 GiB 9995.88 GB)
    Raid Devices : 5
    Total Devices : 4
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent

    Update Time : Sun Mar 3 19:41:51 2019
    State : clean, degraded
    Active Devices : 4
    Working Devices : 4
    Failed Devices : 0
    Spare Devices : 0

    Layout : left-symmetric
    Chunk Size : 64K
    Name : Blade:6 (local to host Blade)
    UUID : 5c453f27:136ff82b:1b81964a:19d75973
    Events : 478796

    Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
    3 68 229 0 active sync /dev/sdca5
    1 68 245 1 active sync /dev/sdcb5
    5 69 5 2 active sync /dev/sdcc5
    4 69 21 3 active sync /dev/sdcd5
    - 0 0 4 removed


    and found that in my case not initialized partition is /dev/sdce5 so I ran:



    mdadm --manage /dev/md6 --add /dev/sdce5


    I check the status with:



    cat /proc/mdstat



    [>....................] recovery = 0.0% (0/9761598976) finish=274544971.2min speed=0K/sec


    And after about a minute or so it has ended (something went wrong). I run mdstat again and It was showing 5 drives but with (F) next to added drive. I rebooted and drive was still dropped from array and stay in not initialised state.



    Storage Manager is showing Repair Option but with volume size of 1 bytes I don't know what will be the result of such repair (rebuild) - it will wipe out data from not initialised disk for sure, which maybe attached by some commands again without rebuild. Moreover such rebuild will take 10 days and It maybe not unnecessary extra strain on a drive.



    Without this drive, SHR Volume with 1-drive failure tolerance, should work normally and be in DEGRADED state, so what can be wrong?



    How to bring this Volume to Normal State?









    share







    New contributor




    otakon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      0












      0








      0








      The Volume on my Synology Expansion crashed and can't recover on its own.




      Drive is probably OK. It happen after cleaning the device from dust. Until that time Volume
      was also OK so I believe it isn't because of failed drive. When Starting up after cleaning, system dropped one disk and this is current state. What is weird it shows the Volume as CRASHED instead of DEGRADED.




      Desktop Panel on Synology is showing that volume exists but Used space of 0 bytes and Available of 1 byte and it is not visible in Shared Folders.



      I'm using Synology DS719+ (DSM 6.2-23739) with DX513 Expansion, which is populated with 5x 10TB IronWolfs having 1 Volume of SHR (1-drive failure tolerance, BTRFS) beyond separate volume, on two disks on main device (DS).



      Storage Manager is showing that one drive is Not Initialized. I ran SMART and IronWolf Health Test on it and as far as tool is concerned the disk is fine.



      Storage Manager log is showing that an I/O error has occured.



      I found similar problem on a Synology Forum - [here][1]



      As @voodooking* advised I run:



      fdisk -l
      cat /proc/mdstat

      Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
      md4 : active raid1 sdb7[2] sda7[1]
      4883750912 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
      md3 : active raid1 sda6[3] sdb6[2]
      488366912 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
      md2 : active raid1 sdb5[2] sda5[3]
      483555456 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
      md6 : active raid5 sdca5[3] sdcd5[4] sdcc5[5] sdcb5[1]
      39046395904 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/4] [UUUU_]
      md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1]
      2097088 blocks [2/2] [UU]
      md0 : active raid1 sda1[1] sdb1[0]
      2490176 blocks [2/2] [UU]


      To find a problematic disk and match it by serial number from Storage Manager I ran:



      hdparm -I /dev/sd???
      mdadm --detail /dev/md6

      /dev/md6:
      Version : 1.2
      Creation Time : Fri Sep 2 14:35:22 2016
      Raid Level : raid5
      Array Size : 39046395904 (37237.54 GiB 39983.51 GB)
      Used Dev Size : 9761598976 (9309.39 GiB 9995.88 GB)
      Raid Devices : 5
      Total Devices : 4
      Persistence : Superblock is persistent

      Update Time : Sun Mar 3 19:41:51 2019
      State : clean, degraded
      Active Devices : 4
      Working Devices : 4
      Failed Devices : 0
      Spare Devices : 0

      Layout : left-symmetric
      Chunk Size : 64K
      Name : Blade:6 (local to host Blade)
      UUID : 5c453f27:136ff82b:1b81964a:19d75973
      Events : 478796

      Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
      3 68 229 0 active sync /dev/sdca5
      1 68 245 1 active sync /dev/sdcb5
      5 69 5 2 active sync /dev/sdcc5
      4 69 21 3 active sync /dev/sdcd5
      - 0 0 4 removed


      and found that in my case not initialized partition is /dev/sdce5 so I ran:



      mdadm --manage /dev/md6 --add /dev/sdce5


      I check the status with:



      cat /proc/mdstat



      [>....................] recovery = 0.0% (0/9761598976) finish=274544971.2min speed=0K/sec


      And after about a minute or so it has ended (something went wrong). I run mdstat again and It was showing 5 drives but with (F) next to added drive. I rebooted and drive was still dropped from array and stay in not initialised state.



      Storage Manager is showing Repair Option but with volume size of 1 bytes I don't know what will be the result of such repair (rebuild) - it will wipe out data from not initialised disk for sure, which maybe attached by some commands again without rebuild. Moreover such rebuild will take 10 days and It maybe not unnecessary extra strain on a drive.



      Without this drive, SHR Volume with 1-drive failure tolerance, should work normally and be in DEGRADED state, so what can be wrong?



      How to bring this Volume to Normal State?









      share







      New contributor




      otakon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      The Volume on my Synology Expansion crashed and can't recover on its own.




      Drive is probably OK. It happen after cleaning the device from dust. Until that time Volume
      was also OK so I believe it isn't because of failed drive. When Starting up after cleaning, system dropped one disk and this is current state. What is weird it shows the Volume as CRASHED instead of DEGRADED.




      Desktop Panel on Synology is showing that volume exists but Used space of 0 bytes and Available of 1 byte and it is not visible in Shared Folders.



      I'm using Synology DS719+ (DSM 6.2-23739) with DX513 Expansion, which is populated with 5x 10TB IronWolfs having 1 Volume of SHR (1-drive failure tolerance, BTRFS) beyond separate volume, on two disks on main device (DS).



      Storage Manager is showing that one drive is Not Initialized. I ran SMART and IronWolf Health Test on it and as far as tool is concerned the disk is fine.



      Storage Manager log is showing that an I/O error has occured.



      I found similar problem on a Synology Forum - [here][1]



      As @voodooking* advised I run:



      fdisk -l
      cat /proc/mdstat

      Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
      md4 : active raid1 sdb7[2] sda7[1]
      4883750912 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
      md3 : active raid1 sda6[3] sdb6[2]
      488366912 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
      md2 : active raid1 sdb5[2] sda5[3]
      483555456 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]
      md6 : active raid5 sdca5[3] sdcd5[4] sdcc5[5] sdcb5[1]
      39046395904 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/4] [UUUU_]
      md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1]
      2097088 blocks [2/2] [UU]
      md0 : active raid1 sda1[1] sdb1[0]
      2490176 blocks [2/2] [UU]


      To find a problematic disk and match it by serial number from Storage Manager I ran:



      hdparm -I /dev/sd???
      mdadm --detail /dev/md6

      /dev/md6:
      Version : 1.2
      Creation Time : Fri Sep 2 14:35:22 2016
      Raid Level : raid5
      Array Size : 39046395904 (37237.54 GiB 39983.51 GB)
      Used Dev Size : 9761598976 (9309.39 GiB 9995.88 GB)
      Raid Devices : 5
      Total Devices : 4
      Persistence : Superblock is persistent

      Update Time : Sun Mar 3 19:41:51 2019
      State : clean, degraded
      Active Devices : 4
      Working Devices : 4
      Failed Devices : 0
      Spare Devices : 0

      Layout : left-symmetric
      Chunk Size : 64K
      Name : Blade:6 (local to host Blade)
      UUID : 5c453f27:136ff82b:1b81964a:19d75973
      Events : 478796

      Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
      3 68 229 0 active sync /dev/sdca5
      1 68 245 1 active sync /dev/sdcb5
      5 69 5 2 active sync /dev/sdcc5
      4 69 21 3 active sync /dev/sdcd5
      - 0 0 4 removed


      and found that in my case not initialized partition is /dev/sdce5 so I ran:



      mdadm --manage /dev/md6 --add /dev/sdce5


      I check the status with:



      cat /proc/mdstat



      [>....................] recovery = 0.0% (0/9761598976) finish=274544971.2min speed=0K/sec


      And after about a minute or so it has ended (something went wrong). I run mdstat again and It was showing 5 drives but with (F) next to added drive. I rebooted and drive was still dropped from array and stay in not initialised state.



      Storage Manager is showing Repair Option but with volume size of 1 bytes I don't know what will be the result of such repair (rebuild) - it will wipe out data from not initialised disk for sure, which maybe attached by some commands again without rebuild. Moreover such rebuild will take 10 days and It maybe not unnecessary extra strain on a drive.



      Without this drive, SHR Volume with 1-drive failure tolerance, should work normally and be in DEGRADED state, so what can be wrong?



      How to bring this Volume to Normal State?







      linux raid synology btrfs degraded





      share







      New contributor




      otakon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share







      New contributor




      otakon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share



      share






      New contributor




      otakon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 4 mins ago









      otakonotakon

      1




      1




      New contributor




      otakon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      otakon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      otakon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "2"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          otakon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f957013%2fbring-crashed-degraded-raid-when-data-is-intact-but-disk-dropped-btrfs-synology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          otakon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          otakon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          otakon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          otakon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f957013%2fbring-crashed-degraded-raid-when-data-is-intact-but-disk-dropped-btrfs-synology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          117736 Шеррод Примітки | Див. також | Посилання | Навігаційне...

          As a Security Precaution, the user account has been locked The Next CEO of Stack OverflowMS...

          Маріан Котлеба Зміст Життєпис | Політичні погляди |...