PsExec slow to start a process The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In ...
How to determine omitted units in a publication
Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit
Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?
Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?
How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?
Can the DM override racial traits?
What information about me do stores get via my credit card?
Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?
Make it rain characters
"is" operation returns false even though two objects have same id
Why doesn't a hydraulic lever violate conservation of energy?
Loose spokes after only a few rides
Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time?
How to handle characters who are more educated than the author?
What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?
Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached
Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one geodesic.
Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?
Presidential Pardon
My body leaves; my core can stay
Is there a way to generate uniformly distributed points on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers per point?
how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?
Why are PDP-7-style microprogrammed instructions out of vogue?
Visa regaring travelling European country
PsExec slow to start a process
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!Why is psExec hanging indefinitely and giving no error?Capturing output of remote process from sysinternal's psexecPSEXEC - PATH VARIABLE NOT FOUNDHow to use psexec in Windows XPPsExec AlternativeHow To use psexec command remotely?How to Block psexec?PsExec and xCmdPsExec will not work due to File and Print Sharing disabled in firewallIIS start remote commands - PsServices | PsExecHow can I troubleshoot simple psExec problems?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
PsExec (v2.11) can take up to a minute to invoke a process, either locally or remotely.
I'm using the following command line:
psexec.exe -u domainusername -p mypassword -accepteula -d -h \machinename C:pathtomyapp.exe
I have the firewall disabled on all machines.
What else can I look at?
UPDATE: I used procmon to highlight the delay:
pstools
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 10 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
PsExec (v2.11) can take up to a minute to invoke a process, either locally or remotely.
I'm using the following command line:
psexec.exe -u domainusername -p mypassword -accepteula -d -h \machinename C:pathtomyapp.exe
I have the firewall disabled on all machines.
What else can I look at?
UPDATE: I used procmon to highlight the delay:
pstools
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 10 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
PsExec (v2.11) can take up to a minute to invoke a process, either locally or remotely.
I'm using the following command line:
psexec.exe -u domainusername -p mypassword -accepteula -d -h \machinename C:pathtomyapp.exe
I have the firewall disabled on all machines.
What else can I look at?
UPDATE: I used procmon to highlight the delay:
pstools
PsExec (v2.11) can take up to a minute to invoke a process, either locally or remotely.
I'm using the following command line:
psexec.exe -u domainusername -p mypassword -accepteula -d -h \machinename C:pathtomyapp.exe
I have the firewall disabled on all machines.
What else can I look at?
UPDATE: I used procmon to highlight the delay:
pstools
pstools
edited Mar 2 '16 at 15:32
Mark Richman
asked Mar 2 '16 at 1:33
Mark RichmanMark Richman
181314
181314
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 10 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 10 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The command indirectly open a user session under the specified username to run the process, thus it will be long, you can't do much for that problem.
Only tip to make it a bit faster:
You can try with -s to run the process as a LOCAL SYSTEM.
Try with -e, so it does not load the user profile.
I just tried those, and it doesn't seem to have any effect. It's interesting because this slowness just started today. The IT guys swear nothing changed ;-) It used to start rather instantaneously.
– Mark Richman
Mar 2 '16 at 2:11
@MarkRichman Check in add/remove program, and verify if any update got installed :) Some nasty (with already know related problem) went live last month.
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 2:30
Which update has the known issue?
– Mark Richman
Mar 2 '16 at 2:31
KB3134228 (technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms16-feb.aspx, support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3134228) Not wrote in the KB text, but on my side it broke a Citrix PVS's server (5.6SP3) to manage virtual machine active directory password.
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 2:38
1
@MarkRichman anyhow, run a processmonitor and watch where is the timeout would be the next step
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 3:02
|
show 7 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f760869%2fpsexec-slow-to-start-a-process%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The command indirectly open a user session under the specified username to run the process, thus it will be long, you can't do much for that problem.
Only tip to make it a bit faster:
You can try with -s to run the process as a LOCAL SYSTEM.
Try with -e, so it does not load the user profile.
I just tried those, and it doesn't seem to have any effect. It's interesting because this slowness just started today. The IT guys swear nothing changed ;-) It used to start rather instantaneously.
– Mark Richman
Mar 2 '16 at 2:11
@MarkRichman Check in add/remove program, and verify if any update got installed :) Some nasty (with already know related problem) went live last month.
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 2:30
Which update has the known issue?
– Mark Richman
Mar 2 '16 at 2:31
KB3134228 (technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms16-feb.aspx, support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3134228) Not wrote in the KB text, but on my side it broke a Citrix PVS's server (5.6SP3) to manage virtual machine active directory password.
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 2:38
1
@MarkRichman anyhow, run a processmonitor and watch where is the timeout would be the next step
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 3:02
|
show 7 more comments
The command indirectly open a user session under the specified username to run the process, thus it will be long, you can't do much for that problem.
Only tip to make it a bit faster:
You can try with -s to run the process as a LOCAL SYSTEM.
Try with -e, so it does not load the user profile.
I just tried those, and it doesn't seem to have any effect. It's interesting because this slowness just started today. The IT guys swear nothing changed ;-) It used to start rather instantaneously.
– Mark Richman
Mar 2 '16 at 2:11
@MarkRichman Check in add/remove program, and verify if any update got installed :) Some nasty (with already know related problem) went live last month.
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 2:30
Which update has the known issue?
– Mark Richman
Mar 2 '16 at 2:31
KB3134228 (technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms16-feb.aspx, support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3134228) Not wrote in the KB text, but on my side it broke a Citrix PVS's server (5.6SP3) to manage virtual machine active directory password.
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 2:38
1
@MarkRichman anyhow, run a processmonitor and watch where is the timeout would be the next step
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 3:02
|
show 7 more comments
The command indirectly open a user session under the specified username to run the process, thus it will be long, you can't do much for that problem.
Only tip to make it a bit faster:
You can try with -s to run the process as a LOCAL SYSTEM.
Try with -e, so it does not load the user profile.
The command indirectly open a user session under the specified username to run the process, thus it will be long, you can't do much for that problem.
Only tip to make it a bit faster:
You can try with -s to run the process as a LOCAL SYSTEM.
Try with -e, so it does not load the user profile.
answered Mar 2 '16 at 2:01
yagmoth555♦yagmoth555
12.4k31842
12.4k31842
I just tried those, and it doesn't seem to have any effect. It's interesting because this slowness just started today. The IT guys swear nothing changed ;-) It used to start rather instantaneously.
– Mark Richman
Mar 2 '16 at 2:11
@MarkRichman Check in add/remove program, and verify if any update got installed :) Some nasty (with already know related problem) went live last month.
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 2:30
Which update has the known issue?
– Mark Richman
Mar 2 '16 at 2:31
KB3134228 (technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms16-feb.aspx, support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3134228) Not wrote in the KB text, but on my side it broke a Citrix PVS's server (5.6SP3) to manage virtual machine active directory password.
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 2:38
1
@MarkRichman anyhow, run a processmonitor and watch where is the timeout would be the next step
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 3:02
|
show 7 more comments
I just tried those, and it doesn't seem to have any effect. It's interesting because this slowness just started today. The IT guys swear nothing changed ;-) It used to start rather instantaneously.
– Mark Richman
Mar 2 '16 at 2:11
@MarkRichman Check in add/remove program, and verify if any update got installed :) Some nasty (with already know related problem) went live last month.
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 2:30
Which update has the known issue?
– Mark Richman
Mar 2 '16 at 2:31
KB3134228 (technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms16-feb.aspx, support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3134228) Not wrote in the KB text, but on my side it broke a Citrix PVS's server (5.6SP3) to manage virtual machine active directory password.
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 2:38
1
@MarkRichman anyhow, run a processmonitor and watch where is the timeout would be the next step
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 3:02
I just tried those, and it doesn't seem to have any effect. It's interesting because this slowness just started today. The IT guys swear nothing changed ;-) It used to start rather instantaneously.
– Mark Richman
Mar 2 '16 at 2:11
I just tried those, and it doesn't seem to have any effect. It's interesting because this slowness just started today. The IT guys swear nothing changed ;-) It used to start rather instantaneously.
– Mark Richman
Mar 2 '16 at 2:11
@MarkRichman Check in add/remove program, and verify if any update got installed :) Some nasty (with already know related problem) went live last month.
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 2:30
@MarkRichman Check in add/remove program, and verify if any update got installed :) Some nasty (with already know related problem) went live last month.
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 2:30
Which update has the known issue?
– Mark Richman
Mar 2 '16 at 2:31
Which update has the known issue?
– Mark Richman
Mar 2 '16 at 2:31
KB3134228 (technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms16-feb.aspx, support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3134228) Not wrote in the KB text, but on my side it broke a Citrix PVS's server (5.6SP3) to manage virtual machine active directory password.
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 2:38
KB3134228 (technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms16-feb.aspx, support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3134228) Not wrote in the KB text, but on my side it broke a Citrix PVS's server (5.6SP3) to manage virtual machine active directory password.
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 2:38
1
1
@MarkRichman anyhow, run a processmonitor and watch where is the timeout would be the next step
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 3:02
@MarkRichman anyhow, run a processmonitor and watch where is the timeout would be the next step
– yagmoth555♦
Mar 2 '16 at 3:02
|
show 7 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f760869%2fpsexec-slow-to-start-a-process%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown