Zabbix: Open port 10050 on client necessary? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679:...
What adaptations would allow standard fantasy dwarves to survive in the desert?
The Nth Gryphon Number
Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell
i2c bus hangs in master RPi access to MSP430G uC ~1 in 1000 accesses
What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?
How many time has Arya actually used Needle?
Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?
Simple HTTP Server
GDP with Intermediate Production
How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?
Sally's older brother
Why is a lens darker than other ones when applying the same settings?
What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思?
Does silver oxide react with hydrogen sulfide?
How many morphisms from 1 to 1+1 can there be?
What is the difference between a "ranged attack" and a "ranged weapon attack"?
What is the "studentd" process?
Found this skink in my tomato plant bucket. Is he trapped? Or could he leave if he wanted?
What are the main differences between the original Stargate SG-1 and the Final Cut edition?
Simple Line in LaTeX Help!
Why datecode is SO IMPORTANT to chip manufacturers?
Why complex landing gears are used instead of simple,reliability and light weight muscle wire or shape memory alloys?
I can't produce songs
After Sam didn't return home in the end, were he and Al still friends?
Zabbix: Open port 10050 on client necessary?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!How do I allow access to a service running on a Forefront TMG Server?Zabbix server SELinux policyZabbix Cannot Get Value From AgentZabbix: MySQL service monitor - invalid entry when restarting zabbix-agentZabbix-agent unreachableZabbix active check monitoring issueZabbix auto remove unreachable hostHow to configure port access with restrictions for zabbix agent and server using firewall?zabbix agent tls supportZabbix- agent hostname no dns
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
Running Zabbix on AWS. The client's Security Group's port 10050 was closed and everything still seems to work. Can someone explain what it is used for?
zabbix zabbix-agent
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 14 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
Running Zabbix on AWS. The client's Security Group's port 10050 was closed and everything still seems to work. Can someone explain what it is used for?
zabbix zabbix-agent
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 14 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
Running Zabbix on AWS. The client's Security Group's port 10050 was closed and everything still seems to work. Can someone explain what it is used for?
zabbix zabbix-agent
Running Zabbix on AWS. The client's Security Group's port 10050 was closed and everything still seems to work. Can someone explain what it is used for?
zabbix zabbix-agent
zabbix zabbix-agent
asked Sep 25 '17 at 23:05
kevkev
146112
146112
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 14 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 14 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Zabbix is probably configured to use passive checks (instead of active). More details below:
https://sites.google.com/site/wikirolanddelepper/systen-monitoring/difference-between-zabbix-agent-active-passive
The wiki doesn't state which version of Zabbix it relates to. Myzabbix_agentd.conf
has noDisableActive
flag. I am runningzabbix_agentd (daemon) (Zabbix) 3.4.1
. Is there any reason to chose passive over active anyway? Requires an additional open port. I think you've mixed up active and passive or are you talking about the client? The wiki page says: "active checks" = client pushes and "passive checks" = server polls. It's from the clients (agents) perspective. I find that confusing too. Should be the other way round.
– kev
Sep 26 '17 at 0:19
So, does that mean if the port 10050 is not open Zabbix falls back to active checks (= client pushing)?
– kev
Sep 26 '17 at 0:21
1
Active/passive description is correct. Passive agent is contacted by server, active agent connects to the server. In recent versions of Zabbix, the configuration parameter is calledServerActive
, which both controls whether active checks should be enabled, and which server[s] to connect to. One reason for passive checks is that they support flexible intervals/scheduling, while active checks do not. If you re using active items only, agent will connect to the server on port 10051. There is no fallback, you explicitly configure this on the item level.
– Richlv
Sep 26 '17 at 8:10
Yes, the client automatically switches over to passive checks if active checks fail and ServerActive config param is enabled.
– Wojciech Olesiejuk
Sep 27 '17 at 7:43
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f875451%2fzabbix-open-port-10050-on-client-necessary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Zabbix is probably configured to use passive checks (instead of active). More details below:
https://sites.google.com/site/wikirolanddelepper/systen-monitoring/difference-between-zabbix-agent-active-passive
The wiki doesn't state which version of Zabbix it relates to. Myzabbix_agentd.conf
has noDisableActive
flag. I am runningzabbix_agentd (daemon) (Zabbix) 3.4.1
. Is there any reason to chose passive over active anyway? Requires an additional open port. I think you've mixed up active and passive or are you talking about the client? The wiki page says: "active checks" = client pushes and "passive checks" = server polls. It's from the clients (agents) perspective. I find that confusing too. Should be the other way round.
– kev
Sep 26 '17 at 0:19
So, does that mean if the port 10050 is not open Zabbix falls back to active checks (= client pushing)?
– kev
Sep 26 '17 at 0:21
1
Active/passive description is correct. Passive agent is contacted by server, active agent connects to the server. In recent versions of Zabbix, the configuration parameter is calledServerActive
, which both controls whether active checks should be enabled, and which server[s] to connect to. One reason for passive checks is that they support flexible intervals/scheduling, while active checks do not. If you re using active items only, agent will connect to the server on port 10051. There is no fallback, you explicitly configure this on the item level.
– Richlv
Sep 26 '17 at 8:10
Yes, the client automatically switches over to passive checks if active checks fail and ServerActive config param is enabled.
– Wojciech Olesiejuk
Sep 27 '17 at 7:43
add a comment |
Zabbix is probably configured to use passive checks (instead of active). More details below:
https://sites.google.com/site/wikirolanddelepper/systen-monitoring/difference-between-zabbix-agent-active-passive
The wiki doesn't state which version of Zabbix it relates to. Myzabbix_agentd.conf
has noDisableActive
flag. I am runningzabbix_agentd (daemon) (Zabbix) 3.4.1
. Is there any reason to chose passive over active anyway? Requires an additional open port. I think you've mixed up active and passive or are you talking about the client? The wiki page says: "active checks" = client pushes and "passive checks" = server polls. It's from the clients (agents) perspective. I find that confusing too. Should be the other way round.
– kev
Sep 26 '17 at 0:19
So, does that mean if the port 10050 is not open Zabbix falls back to active checks (= client pushing)?
– kev
Sep 26 '17 at 0:21
1
Active/passive description is correct. Passive agent is contacted by server, active agent connects to the server. In recent versions of Zabbix, the configuration parameter is calledServerActive
, which both controls whether active checks should be enabled, and which server[s] to connect to. One reason for passive checks is that they support flexible intervals/scheduling, while active checks do not. If you re using active items only, agent will connect to the server on port 10051. There is no fallback, you explicitly configure this on the item level.
– Richlv
Sep 26 '17 at 8:10
Yes, the client automatically switches over to passive checks if active checks fail and ServerActive config param is enabled.
– Wojciech Olesiejuk
Sep 27 '17 at 7:43
add a comment |
Zabbix is probably configured to use passive checks (instead of active). More details below:
https://sites.google.com/site/wikirolanddelepper/systen-monitoring/difference-between-zabbix-agent-active-passive
Zabbix is probably configured to use passive checks (instead of active). More details below:
https://sites.google.com/site/wikirolanddelepper/systen-monitoring/difference-between-zabbix-agent-active-passive
answered Sep 25 '17 at 23:43
Wojciech OlesiejukWojciech Olesiejuk
111
111
The wiki doesn't state which version of Zabbix it relates to. Myzabbix_agentd.conf
has noDisableActive
flag. I am runningzabbix_agentd (daemon) (Zabbix) 3.4.1
. Is there any reason to chose passive over active anyway? Requires an additional open port. I think you've mixed up active and passive or are you talking about the client? The wiki page says: "active checks" = client pushes and "passive checks" = server polls. It's from the clients (agents) perspective. I find that confusing too. Should be the other way round.
– kev
Sep 26 '17 at 0:19
So, does that mean if the port 10050 is not open Zabbix falls back to active checks (= client pushing)?
– kev
Sep 26 '17 at 0:21
1
Active/passive description is correct. Passive agent is contacted by server, active agent connects to the server. In recent versions of Zabbix, the configuration parameter is calledServerActive
, which both controls whether active checks should be enabled, and which server[s] to connect to. One reason for passive checks is that they support flexible intervals/scheduling, while active checks do not. If you re using active items only, agent will connect to the server on port 10051. There is no fallback, you explicitly configure this on the item level.
– Richlv
Sep 26 '17 at 8:10
Yes, the client automatically switches over to passive checks if active checks fail and ServerActive config param is enabled.
– Wojciech Olesiejuk
Sep 27 '17 at 7:43
add a comment |
The wiki doesn't state which version of Zabbix it relates to. Myzabbix_agentd.conf
has noDisableActive
flag. I am runningzabbix_agentd (daemon) (Zabbix) 3.4.1
. Is there any reason to chose passive over active anyway? Requires an additional open port. I think you've mixed up active and passive or are you talking about the client? The wiki page says: "active checks" = client pushes and "passive checks" = server polls. It's from the clients (agents) perspective. I find that confusing too. Should be the other way round.
– kev
Sep 26 '17 at 0:19
So, does that mean if the port 10050 is not open Zabbix falls back to active checks (= client pushing)?
– kev
Sep 26 '17 at 0:21
1
Active/passive description is correct. Passive agent is contacted by server, active agent connects to the server. In recent versions of Zabbix, the configuration parameter is calledServerActive
, which both controls whether active checks should be enabled, and which server[s] to connect to. One reason for passive checks is that they support flexible intervals/scheduling, while active checks do not. If you re using active items only, agent will connect to the server on port 10051. There is no fallback, you explicitly configure this on the item level.
– Richlv
Sep 26 '17 at 8:10
Yes, the client automatically switches over to passive checks if active checks fail and ServerActive config param is enabled.
– Wojciech Olesiejuk
Sep 27 '17 at 7:43
The wiki doesn't state which version of Zabbix it relates to. My
zabbix_agentd.conf
has no DisableActive
flag. I am running zabbix_agentd (daemon) (Zabbix) 3.4.1
. Is there any reason to chose passive over active anyway? Requires an additional open port. I think you've mixed up active and passive or are you talking about the client? The wiki page says: "active checks" = client pushes and "passive checks" = server polls. It's from the clients (agents) perspective. I find that confusing too. Should be the other way round.– kev
Sep 26 '17 at 0:19
The wiki doesn't state which version of Zabbix it relates to. My
zabbix_agentd.conf
has no DisableActive
flag. I am running zabbix_agentd (daemon) (Zabbix) 3.4.1
. Is there any reason to chose passive over active anyway? Requires an additional open port. I think you've mixed up active and passive or are you talking about the client? The wiki page says: "active checks" = client pushes and "passive checks" = server polls. It's from the clients (agents) perspective. I find that confusing too. Should be the other way round.– kev
Sep 26 '17 at 0:19
So, does that mean if the port 10050 is not open Zabbix falls back to active checks (= client pushing)?
– kev
Sep 26 '17 at 0:21
So, does that mean if the port 10050 is not open Zabbix falls back to active checks (= client pushing)?
– kev
Sep 26 '17 at 0:21
1
1
Active/passive description is correct. Passive agent is contacted by server, active agent connects to the server. In recent versions of Zabbix, the configuration parameter is called
ServerActive
, which both controls whether active checks should be enabled, and which server[s] to connect to. One reason for passive checks is that they support flexible intervals/scheduling, while active checks do not. If you re using active items only, agent will connect to the server on port 10051. There is no fallback, you explicitly configure this on the item level.– Richlv
Sep 26 '17 at 8:10
Active/passive description is correct. Passive agent is contacted by server, active agent connects to the server. In recent versions of Zabbix, the configuration parameter is called
ServerActive
, which both controls whether active checks should be enabled, and which server[s] to connect to. One reason for passive checks is that they support flexible intervals/scheduling, while active checks do not. If you re using active items only, agent will connect to the server on port 10051. There is no fallback, you explicitly configure this on the item level.– Richlv
Sep 26 '17 at 8:10
Yes, the client automatically switches over to passive checks if active checks fail and ServerActive config param is enabled.
– Wojciech Olesiejuk
Sep 27 '17 at 7:43
Yes, the client automatically switches over to passive checks if active checks fail and ServerActive config param is enabled.
– Wojciech Olesiejuk
Sep 27 '17 at 7:43
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f875451%2fzabbix-open-port-10050-on-client-necessary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown