Can I retract my name from an already published manuscript?How to remove a co-author from an article...
How to properly claim credit for peer review?
Am I a Rude Number?
How to push a box with physics engine by another object?
Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?
Inventor that creates machine that grabs man from future
Criticizing long fiction. How is it different from short?
Which branches of mathematics can be done just in terms of morphisms and composition?
How to avoid being sexist when trying to employ someone to function in a very sexist environment?
Why is this code uniquely decodable?
What is the purpose of easy combat scenarios that don't need resource expenditure?
Has the Isbell–Freyd criterion ever been used to check that a category is concretisable?
If all harmonics are generated by plucking, how does a guitar string produce a pure frequency sound?
Where is this triangular-shaped space station from?
What are these green text/line displays shown during the livestream of Crew Dragon's approach to dock with the ISS?
What is Crew Dragon approaching in this picture?
Finding the number of integers that are a square and a cube at the same time
What is the wife of a henpecked husband called?
It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)
What happens if a wizard reaches level 20 but has no 3rd-level spells that they can use with the Signature Spells feature?
LTSpice: When running a linear AC simulation, how to view the voltage ratio between two voltages?
How to mitigate "bandwagon attacking" from players?
Obtaining a matrix of complex values from associations giving the real and imaginary parts of each element?
Eww, those bytes are gross
Meth dealer reference in Family Guy
Can I retract my name from an already published manuscript?
How to remove a co-author from an article published on arXiv?How to withdraw ones name from an already published paperWhen should an author retract their paper as a result of misinterpreted results?How to phrase authors' contributions when the convention is that all team members are authors?What to reply to your former supervisor that wrote that your paper “isn't worth much” before submission to a journal?My paper was accepted, but I found an error affecting all of the figures. What will happen next?Affiliated institution wants to remove name from already published paper?Authorship for papers not completed before leaving, where I am major contributor?Authorship disagreementHow to withdraw ones name from an already published paperResolving a dispute for first authorship where the value and demarcations of individual contributions are hard to identifyCo-authors decided to remove most of my contributions from a Nature paper without my consent
I'm a co-author on a paper that was published in a Nature family journal some months ago because of my scientific contribution to the work presented there. I've discovered that the first author of this paper (let's call them Pat) has, in several instances, over several years, committed scientific fraud by manipulating raw data in other publications. I have no direct evidence that Pat has done anything wrong in the paper I'm on, but I assume they probably have, given their past conduct. I don't want my name to be associated with their name.
If I ask the journal to remove my name from the author list, will they simply do it?
publications ethics authorship
New contributor
|
show 13 more comments
I'm a co-author on a paper that was published in a Nature family journal some months ago because of my scientific contribution to the work presented there. I've discovered that the first author of this paper (let's call them Pat) has, in several instances, over several years, committed scientific fraud by manipulating raw data in other publications. I have no direct evidence that Pat has done anything wrong in the paper I'm on, but I assume they probably have, given their past conduct. I don't want my name to be associated with their name.
If I ask the journal to remove my name from the author list, will they simply do it?
publications ethics authorship
New contributor
5
Do you think there would be any trust in scientific literature, if everybody can simply remove his authorship at any time.......????
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
3
Yeah. Papers with reputable names in the author list would tend to be ones I'd trust.
– toothnail
15 hours ago
1
there are harvard professors who conducted scientific fraud, reputation doesn't help, look jan hendrik schön or marc hauser, your mistake was to simply put your name on that paper without internally discussing, scrutinizing each others work, especially if the first author is unknown to you...
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
4
@Michael What is your point? How exactly would trust in scientific literature be affected by some authors removing their names (due to good reasons)?
– Orion
15 hours ago
1
@MichaelSchmidt Well, perhaps we are excited to read your answer - given your comments it should be enlightening...
– Solar Mike
15 hours ago
|
show 13 more comments
I'm a co-author on a paper that was published in a Nature family journal some months ago because of my scientific contribution to the work presented there. I've discovered that the first author of this paper (let's call them Pat) has, in several instances, over several years, committed scientific fraud by manipulating raw data in other publications. I have no direct evidence that Pat has done anything wrong in the paper I'm on, but I assume they probably have, given their past conduct. I don't want my name to be associated with their name.
If I ask the journal to remove my name from the author list, will they simply do it?
publications ethics authorship
New contributor
I'm a co-author on a paper that was published in a Nature family journal some months ago because of my scientific contribution to the work presented there. I've discovered that the first author of this paper (let's call them Pat) has, in several instances, over several years, committed scientific fraud by manipulating raw data in other publications. I have no direct evidence that Pat has done anything wrong in the paper I'm on, but I assume they probably have, given their past conduct. I don't want my name to be associated with their name.
If I ask the journal to remove my name from the author list, will they simply do it?
publications ethics authorship
publications ethics authorship
New contributor
New contributor
edited 10 hours ago
Ari Brodsky
29928
29928
New contributor
asked 18 hours ago
toothnailtoothnail
395
395
New contributor
New contributor
5
Do you think there would be any trust in scientific literature, if everybody can simply remove his authorship at any time.......????
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
3
Yeah. Papers with reputable names in the author list would tend to be ones I'd trust.
– toothnail
15 hours ago
1
there are harvard professors who conducted scientific fraud, reputation doesn't help, look jan hendrik schön or marc hauser, your mistake was to simply put your name on that paper without internally discussing, scrutinizing each others work, especially if the first author is unknown to you...
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
4
@Michael What is your point? How exactly would trust in scientific literature be affected by some authors removing their names (due to good reasons)?
– Orion
15 hours ago
1
@MichaelSchmidt Well, perhaps we are excited to read your answer - given your comments it should be enlightening...
– Solar Mike
15 hours ago
|
show 13 more comments
5
Do you think there would be any trust in scientific literature, if everybody can simply remove his authorship at any time.......????
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
3
Yeah. Papers with reputable names in the author list would tend to be ones I'd trust.
– toothnail
15 hours ago
1
there are harvard professors who conducted scientific fraud, reputation doesn't help, look jan hendrik schön or marc hauser, your mistake was to simply put your name on that paper without internally discussing, scrutinizing each others work, especially if the first author is unknown to you...
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
4
@Michael What is your point? How exactly would trust in scientific literature be affected by some authors removing their names (due to good reasons)?
– Orion
15 hours ago
1
@MichaelSchmidt Well, perhaps we are excited to read your answer - given your comments it should be enlightening...
– Solar Mike
15 hours ago
5
5
Do you think there would be any trust in scientific literature, if everybody can simply remove his authorship at any time.......????
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
Do you think there would be any trust in scientific literature, if everybody can simply remove his authorship at any time.......????
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
3
3
Yeah. Papers with reputable names in the author list would tend to be ones I'd trust.
– toothnail
15 hours ago
Yeah. Papers with reputable names in the author list would tend to be ones I'd trust.
– toothnail
15 hours ago
1
1
there are harvard professors who conducted scientific fraud, reputation doesn't help, look jan hendrik schön or marc hauser, your mistake was to simply put your name on that paper without internally discussing, scrutinizing each others work, especially if the first author is unknown to you...
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
there are harvard professors who conducted scientific fraud, reputation doesn't help, look jan hendrik schön or marc hauser, your mistake was to simply put your name on that paper without internally discussing, scrutinizing each others work, especially if the first author is unknown to you...
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
4
4
@Michael What is your point? How exactly would trust in scientific literature be affected by some authors removing their names (due to good reasons)?
– Orion
15 hours ago
@Michael What is your point? How exactly would trust in scientific literature be affected by some authors removing their names (due to good reasons)?
– Orion
15 hours ago
1
1
@MichaelSchmidt Well, perhaps we are excited to read your answer - given your comments it should be enlightening...
– Solar Mike
15 hours ago
@MichaelSchmidt Well, perhaps we are excited to read your answer - given your comments it should be enlightening...
– Solar Mike
15 hours ago
|
show 13 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
If I ask the journal to remove my name from the author list, will they simply do it?
No one can say other than the journal, but personally I find your wish unreasonable. The fact that you are a coauthor of the paper is now a historical fact and as such not subject to change in my opinion. Keep in mind that even when a journal retracts a paper, they don’t pretend they never published it, but rather issue a statement saying they no longer endorse the validity of the paper. This preserves a record of the historical events that occurred and maintains a sense of continuity of the picture of reality the journal presents to its readers and to the world.
Similarly, if one of a paper’s coauthors no longer stands behind the validity of the paper, I would expect the journal would at most append to the article a statement saying that you no longer wish to be considered a coauthor of the paper. But it would be dishonest of the journal, and would be doing a disservice to its readers and to historical accuracy, to pretend you were never a coauthor by simply airbrushing your name off the author list.
So, my feeling is that you are free at any time to disavow your implicit endorsement of the paper that comes with being a coauthor. You may not even need the journal’s help to do that - for example, you can post a statement that you no longer endorse the validity of the paper on your personal web page. And you can also ask the journal to post the same notice online next to the published paper - hopefully they will find that a reasonable request, and perhaps it could motivate them to investigate whether the paper contains fraudulent data. But I think it’s dishonest to pretend you were never a coauthor of the paper, and unreasonable to ask the journal to carry on such a pretense.
Finally, keep in mind that “Pat”’s dishonesty is her own. If you unwittingly coauthored a paper in which she committed fraud, that would make you a victim, not a perpetrator, of misconduct. I don’t think it reflects poorly on you that you fell victim to such fraud (if indeed that is what happened), as long as your own work on the paper was done in good faith, and you had no knowledge of any fraud or other unethical behavior on the part of the other authors.
1
And, in any case, after a bit of time, your name is preserved in any citations of the paper in other work. You can't change the past.
– Buffy
12 hours ago
add a comment |
You have to contact the editor, no other answer. Only they will tell you if it is possible for their publication.
You may find this helpful : How to withdraw ones name from an already published paper
6
I would not contact the editor without discussing this issue before among the authors, contacting the editor is probably the very last option he should choose...imho
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
toothnail is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125867%2fcan-i-retract-my-name-from-an-already-published-manuscript%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If I ask the journal to remove my name from the author list, will they simply do it?
No one can say other than the journal, but personally I find your wish unreasonable. The fact that you are a coauthor of the paper is now a historical fact and as such not subject to change in my opinion. Keep in mind that even when a journal retracts a paper, they don’t pretend they never published it, but rather issue a statement saying they no longer endorse the validity of the paper. This preserves a record of the historical events that occurred and maintains a sense of continuity of the picture of reality the journal presents to its readers and to the world.
Similarly, if one of a paper’s coauthors no longer stands behind the validity of the paper, I would expect the journal would at most append to the article a statement saying that you no longer wish to be considered a coauthor of the paper. But it would be dishonest of the journal, and would be doing a disservice to its readers and to historical accuracy, to pretend you were never a coauthor by simply airbrushing your name off the author list.
So, my feeling is that you are free at any time to disavow your implicit endorsement of the paper that comes with being a coauthor. You may not even need the journal’s help to do that - for example, you can post a statement that you no longer endorse the validity of the paper on your personal web page. And you can also ask the journal to post the same notice online next to the published paper - hopefully they will find that a reasonable request, and perhaps it could motivate them to investigate whether the paper contains fraudulent data. But I think it’s dishonest to pretend you were never a coauthor of the paper, and unreasonable to ask the journal to carry on such a pretense.
Finally, keep in mind that “Pat”’s dishonesty is her own. If you unwittingly coauthored a paper in which she committed fraud, that would make you a victim, not a perpetrator, of misconduct. I don’t think it reflects poorly on you that you fell victim to such fraud (if indeed that is what happened), as long as your own work on the paper was done in good faith, and you had no knowledge of any fraud or other unethical behavior on the part of the other authors.
1
And, in any case, after a bit of time, your name is preserved in any citations of the paper in other work. You can't change the past.
– Buffy
12 hours ago
add a comment |
If I ask the journal to remove my name from the author list, will they simply do it?
No one can say other than the journal, but personally I find your wish unreasonable. The fact that you are a coauthor of the paper is now a historical fact and as such not subject to change in my opinion. Keep in mind that even when a journal retracts a paper, they don’t pretend they never published it, but rather issue a statement saying they no longer endorse the validity of the paper. This preserves a record of the historical events that occurred and maintains a sense of continuity of the picture of reality the journal presents to its readers and to the world.
Similarly, if one of a paper’s coauthors no longer stands behind the validity of the paper, I would expect the journal would at most append to the article a statement saying that you no longer wish to be considered a coauthor of the paper. But it would be dishonest of the journal, and would be doing a disservice to its readers and to historical accuracy, to pretend you were never a coauthor by simply airbrushing your name off the author list.
So, my feeling is that you are free at any time to disavow your implicit endorsement of the paper that comes with being a coauthor. You may not even need the journal’s help to do that - for example, you can post a statement that you no longer endorse the validity of the paper on your personal web page. And you can also ask the journal to post the same notice online next to the published paper - hopefully they will find that a reasonable request, and perhaps it could motivate them to investigate whether the paper contains fraudulent data. But I think it’s dishonest to pretend you were never a coauthor of the paper, and unreasonable to ask the journal to carry on such a pretense.
Finally, keep in mind that “Pat”’s dishonesty is her own. If you unwittingly coauthored a paper in which she committed fraud, that would make you a victim, not a perpetrator, of misconduct. I don’t think it reflects poorly on you that you fell victim to such fraud (if indeed that is what happened), as long as your own work on the paper was done in good faith, and you had no knowledge of any fraud or other unethical behavior on the part of the other authors.
1
And, in any case, after a bit of time, your name is preserved in any citations of the paper in other work. You can't change the past.
– Buffy
12 hours ago
add a comment |
If I ask the journal to remove my name from the author list, will they simply do it?
No one can say other than the journal, but personally I find your wish unreasonable. The fact that you are a coauthor of the paper is now a historical fact and as such not subject to change in my opinion. Keep in mind that even when a journal retracts a paper, they don’t pretend they never published it, but rather issue a statement saying they no longer endorse the validity of the paper. This preserves a record of the historical events that occurred and maintains a sense of continuity of the picture of reality the journal presents to its readers and to the world.
Similarly, if one of a paper’s coauthors no longer stands behind the validity of the paper, I would expect the journal would at most append to the article a statement saying that you no longer wish to be considered a coauthor of the paper. But it would be dishonest of the journal, and would be doing a disservice to its readers and to historical accuracy, to pretend you were never a coauthor by simply airbrushing your name off the author list.
So, my feeling is that you are free at any time to disavow your implicit endorsement of the paper that comes with being a coauthor. You may not even need the journal’s help to do that - for example, you can post a statement that you no longer endorse the validity of the paper on your personal web page. And you can also ask the journal to post the same notice online next to the published paper - hopefully they will find that a reasonable request, and perhaps it could motivate them to investigate whether the paper contains fraudulent data. But I think it’s dishonest to pretend you were never a coauthor of the paper, and unreasonable to ask the journal to carry on such a pretense.
Finally, keep in mind that “Pat”’s dishonesty is her own. If you unwittingly coauthored a paper in which she committed fraud, that would make you a victim, not a perpetrator, of misconduct. I don’t think it reflects poorly on you that you fell victim to such fraud (if indeed that is what happened), as long as your own work on the paper was done in good faith, and you had no knowledge of any fraud or other unethical behavior on the part of the other authors.
If I ask the journal to remove my name from the author list, will they simply do it?
No one can say other than the journal, but personally I find your wish unreasonable. The fact that you are a coauthor of the paper is now a historical fact and as such not subject to change in my opinion. Keep in mind that even when a journal retracts a paper, they don’t pretend they never published it, but rather issue a statement saying they no longer endorse the validity of the paper. This preserves a record of the historical events that occurred and maintains a sense of continuity of the picture of reality the journal presents to its readers and to the world.
Similarly, if one of a paper’s coauthors no longer stands behind the validity of the paper, I would expect the journal would at most append to the article a statement saying that you no longer wish to be considered a coauthor of the paper. But it would be dishonest of the journal, and would be doing a disservice to its readers and to historical accuracy, to pretend you were never a coauthor by simply airbrushing your name off the author list.
So, my feeling is that you are free at any time to disavow your implicit endorsement of the paper that comes with being a coauthor. You may not even need the journal’s help to do that - for example, you can post a statement that you no longer endorse the validity of the paper on your personal web page. And you can also ask the journal to post the same notice online next to the published paper - hopefully they will find that a reasonable request, and perhaps it could motivate them to investigate whether the paper contains fraudulent data. But I think it’s dishonest to pretend you were never a coauthor of the paper, and unreasonable to ask the journal to carry on such a pretense.
Finally, keep in mind that “Pat”’s dishonesty is her own. If you unwittingly coauthored a paper in which she committed fraud, that would make you a victim, not a perpetrator, of misconduct. I don’t think it reflects poorly on you that you fell victim to such fraud (if indeed that is what happened), as long as your own work on the paper was done in good faith, and you had no knowledge of any fraud or other unethical behavior on the part of the other authors.
answered 13 hours ago
Dan RomikDan Romik
86.6k22187285
86.6k22187285
1
And, in any case, after a bit of time, your name is preserved in any citations of the paper in other work. You can't change the past.
– Buffy
12 hours ago
add a comment |
1
And, in any case, after a bit of time, your name is preserved in any citations of the paper in other work. You can't change the past.
– Buffy
12 hours ago
1
1
And, in any case, after a bit of time, your name is preserved in any citations of the paper in other work. You can't change the past.
– Buffy
12 hours ago
And, in any case, after a bit of time, your name is preserved in any citations of the paper in other work. You can't change the past.
– Buffy
12 hours ago
add a comment |
You have to contact the editor, no other answer. Only they will tell you if it is possible for their publication.
You may find this helpful : How to withdraw ones name from an already published paper
6
I would not contact the editor without discussing this issue before among the authors, contacting the editor is probably the very last option he should choose...imho
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
add a comment |
You have to contact the editor, no other answer. Only they will tell you if it is possible for their publication.
You may find this helpful : How to withdraw ones name from an already published paper
6
I would not contact the editor without discussing this issue before among the authors, contacting the editor is probably the very last option he should choose...imho
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
add a comment |
You have to contact the editor, no other answer. Only they will tell you if it is possible for their publication.
You may find this helpful : How to withdraw ones name from an already published paper
You have to contact the editor, no other answer. Only they will tell you if it is possible for their publication.
You may find this helpful : How to withdraw ones name from an already published paper
answered 18 hours ago
Solar MikeSolar Mike
13.5k52550
13.5k52550
6
I would not contact the editor without discussing this issue before among the authors, contacting the editor is probably the very last option he should choose...imho
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
add a comment |
6
I would not contact the editor without discussing this issue before among the authors, contacting the editor is probably the very last option he should choose...imho
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
6
6
I would not contact the editor without discussing this issue before among the authors, contacting the editor is probably the very last option he should choose...imho
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
I would not contact the editor without discussing this issue before among the authors, contacting the editor is probably the very last option he should choose...imho
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
add a comment |
toothnail is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
toothnail is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
toothnail is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
toothnail is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125867%2fcan-i-retract-my-name-from-an-already-published-manuscript%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5
Do you think there would be any trust in scientific literature, if everybody can simply remove his authorship at any time.......????
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
3
Yeah. Papers with reputable names in the author list would tend to be ones I'd trust.
– toothnail
15 hours ago
1
there are harvard professors who conducted scientific fraud, reputation doesn't help, look jan hendrik schön or marc hauser, your mistake was to simply put your name on that paper without internally discussing, scrutinizing each others work, especially if the first author is unknown to you...
– Michael Schmidt
15 hours ago
4
@Michael What is your point? How exactly would trust in scientific literature be affected by some authors removing their names (due to good reasons)?
– Orion
15 hours ago
1
@MichaelSchmidt Well, perhaps we are excited to read your answer - given your comments it should be enlightening...
– Solar Mike
15 hours ago