Performance issue with debian guests on xenserver with iscsi storageiSCSI, failover and XenServerCitrix...
What has been your most complicated TikZ drawing?
Is it possible that AIC = BIC?
Calculus II Professor will not accept my correct integral evaluation that uses a different method, should I bring this up further?
Theorems like the Lovász Local Lemma?
Can anyone tell me why this program fails?
Rejected in 4th interview round citing insufficient years of experience
Rules about breaking the rules. How do I do it well?
Is having access to past exams cheating and, if yes, could it be proven just by a good grade?
Using "wallow" verb with object
Provisioning profile doesn't include the application-identifier and keychain-access-groups entitlements
Identifying the interval from A♭ to D♯
Why does Deadpool say "You're welcome, Canada," after shooting Ryan Reynolds in the end credits?
At what level can a dragon innately cast its spells?
Why do Australian milk farmers need to protest supermarkets' milk price?
Good allowance savings plan?
How to generate globally unique ids for different tables of the same database?
Have researchers managed to "reverse time"? If so, what does that mean for physics?
Brexit - No Deal Rejection
Humanity loses the vast majority of its technology, information, and population in the year 2122. How long does it take to rebuild itself?
How to simplify this time periods definition interface?
What is the greatest age difference between a married couple in Tanach?
How could a female member of a species produce eggs unto death?
Happy pi day, everyone!
Do I need life insurance if I can cover my own funeral costs?
Performance issue with debian guests on xenserver with iscsi storage
iSCSI, failover and XenServerCitrix XenServer iSCSI shared disk?Weird nfs performance: 1 thread better than 8, 8 better than 2!Booting XenServer 5.6 from iSCSIHP DL380 G7 + Smart Array P410i + sysbench -> poor raid 10 performanceiSCSI Storage with Broadcom BCM5709 Offload in XenServer 6.2Install xenserver on iscsi targetSlow copying between NFS/CIFS directories on same serverXenserver, iSCSI and Dell MD3600ilow network performance between Citrix XenServer and Linux iSCSI storage
I am facing a performance issue with my small virtualization environnment.
I have two Dell PowerEdge 2950 and a Qnap TS-453-BU.
The Dells are equipped with XenServer 6.5.0 and they are attached to an iSCSI target with a pair of LUNs on the Qnap.
So far I installed several VM with no issues.
Recently I installed a few debian 8 with a LVM partitioning and i faced some performance issues.
To analyze them, i installed two twin vms, with debian 8, one with LVM (testlvm) and one without (testnolvm) and i ran some bonnie++ tests:
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
testnolvm 4G 89 99 47597 25 29559 26 127 99 95660 41 443.2 23
Latency 190ms 520ms 575ms 127ms 267ms 1584ms
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
testlvm 4G 85 99 48245 27 30707 27 120 99 94637 45 491.7 22
Latency 214ms 203ms 589ms 241ms 189ms 411ms
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
testnolvm -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 12529 77 +++++ +++ 20241 89 16491 90 +++++ +++ 20389 90
Latency 2099us 637us 777us 1013us 270us 522us
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
testlvm -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 14261 86 +++++ +++ 19722 90 16002 91 +++++ +++ 12159 56
Latency 29901us 580us 718us 232us 1236us 602us
I see very similar results on the throughputs but different in the latency.
I am not able to figure out what is wrong, because i also made other tests (mixing debian 7, debian 8, lvm, no lvm scenarios) getting confusing results.
It is a fact that i have a debian 7 with no lvm (installed at least one year ago) and a recently installed debian 8 with lvm that have very different performance;
for example, timing a "cat -file-" (i tried /etc/issue but also /proc/diskstats, so both real fs and memory) gives me a real of 0.005s on the first machine and 10 times more on the second machine.
Another example is that activating (on the second machine) a zabbix agent that monitors disk performance (making a lot of cat and grep on the /proc/diskstats) brings the cpu util to 50% without any other load (while on the old deb7 vm is almost seamless).
I even tried to move this "slow" vm on a new (thick provisioned) LUN without any improvement.
Any hints?
Thanks in advance.
debian lvm xen iscsi xenserver
add a comment |
I am facing a performance issue with my small virtualization environnment.
I have two Dell PowerEdge 2950 and a Qnap TS-453-BU.
The Dells are equipped with XenServer 6.5.0 and they are attached to an iSCSI target with a pair of LUNs on the Qnap.
So far I installed several VM with no issues.
Recently I installed a few debian 8 with a LVM partitioning and i faced some performance issues.
To analyze them, i installed two twin vms, with debian 8, one with LVM (testlvm) and one without (testnolvm) and i ran some bonnie++ tests:
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
testnolvm 4G 89 99 47597 25 29559 26 127 99 95660 41 443.2 23
Latency 190ms 520ms 575ms 127ms 267ms 1584ms
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
testlvm 4G 85 99 48245 27 30707 27 120 99 94637 45 491.7 22
Latency 214ms 203ms 589ms 241ms 189ms 411ms
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
testnolvm -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 12529 77 +++++ +++ 20241 89 16491 90 +++++ +++ 20389 90
Latency 2099us 637us 777us 1013us 270us 522us
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
testlvm -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 14261 86 +++++ +++ 19722 90 16002 91 +++++ +++ 12159 56
Latency 29901us 580us 718us 232us 1236us 602us
I see very similar results on the throughputs but different in the latency.
I am not able to figure out what is wrong, because i also made other tests (mixing debian 7, debian 8, lvm, no lvm scenarios) getting confusing results.
It is a fact that i have a debian 7 with no lvm (installed at least one year ago) and a recently installed debian 8 with lvm that have very different performance;
for example, timing a "cat -file-" (i tried /etc/issue but also /proc/diskstats, so both real fs and memory) gives me a real of 0.005s on the first machine and 10 times more on the second machine.
Another example is that activating (on the second machine) a zabbix agent that monitors disk performance (making a lot of cat and grep on the /proc/diskstats) brings the cpu util to 50% without any other load (while on the old deb7 vm is almost seamless).
I even tried to move this "slow" vm on a new (thick provisioned) LUN without any improvement.
Any hints?
Thanks in advance.
debian lvm xen iscsi xenserver
add a comment |
I am facing a performance issue with my small virtualization environnment.
I have two Dell PowerEdge 2950 and a Qnap TS-453-BU.
The Dells are equipped with XenServer 6.5.0 and they are attached to an iSCSI target with a pair of LUNs on the Qnap.
So far I installed several VM with no issues.
Recently I installed a few debian 8 with a LVM partitioning and i faced some performance issues.
To analyze them, i installed two twin vms, with debian 8, one with LVM (testlvm) and one without (testnolvm) and i ran some bonnie++ tests:
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
testnolvm 4G 89 99 47597 25 29559 26 127 99 95660 41 443.2 23
Latency 190ms 520ms 575ms 127ms 267ms 1584ms
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
testlvm 4G 85 99 48245 27 30707 27 120 99 94637 45 491.7 22
Latency 214ms 203ms 589ms 241ms 189ms 411ms
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
testnolvm -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 12529 77 +++++ +++ 20241 89 16491 90 +++++ +++ 20389 90
Latency 2099us 637us 777us 1013us 270us 522us
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
testlvm -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 14261 86 +++++ +++ 19722 90 16002 91 +++++ +++ 12159 56
Latency 29901us 580us 718us 232us 1236us 602us
I see very similar results on the throughputs but different in the latency.
I am not able to figure out what is wrong, because i also made other tests (mixing debian 7, debian 8, lvm, no lvm scenarios) getting confusing results.
It is a fact that i have a debian 7 with no lvm (installed at least one year ago) and a recently installed debian 8 with lvm that have very different performance;
for example, timing a "cat -file-" (i tried /etc/issue but also /proc/diskstats, so both real fs and memory) gives me a real of 0.005s on the first machine and 10 times more on the second machine.
Another example is that activating (on the second machine) a zabbix agent that monitors disk performance (making a lot of cat and grep on the /proc/diskstats) brings the cpu util to 50% without any other load (while on the old deb7 vm is almost seamless).
I even tried to move this "slow" vm on a new (thick provisioned) LUN without any improvement.
Any hints?
Thanks in advance.
debian lvm xen iscsi xenserver
I am facing a performance issue with my small virtualization environnment.
I have two Dell PowerEdge 2950 and a Qnap TS-453-BU.
The Dells are equipped with XenServer 6.5.0 and they are attached to an iSCSI target with a pair of LUNs on the Qnap.
So far I installed several VM with no issues.
Recently I installed a few debian 8 with a LVM partitioning and i faced some performance issues.
To analyze them, i installed two twin vms, with debian 8, one with LVM (testlvm) and one without (testnolvm) and i ran some bonnie++ tests:
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
testnolvm 4G 89 99 47597 25 29559 26 127 99 95660 41 443.2 23
Latency 190ms 520ms 575ms 127ms 267ms 1584ms
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
testlvm 4G 85 99 48245 27 30707 27 120 99 94637 45 491.7 22
Latency 214ms 203ms 589ms 241ms 189ms 411ms
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
testnolvm -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 12529 77 +++++ +++ 20241 89 16491 90 +++++ +++ 20389 90
Latency 2099us 637us 777us 1013us 270us 522us
Version 1.97 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
testlvm -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 14261 86 +++++ +++ 19722 90 16002 91 +++++ +++ 12159 56
Latency 29901us 580us 718us 232us 1236us 602us
I see very similar results on the throughputs but different in the latency.
I am not able to figure out what is wrong, because i also made other tests (mixing debian 7, debian 8, lvm, no lvm scenarios) getting confusing results.
It is a fact that i have a debian 7 with no lvm (installed at least one year ago) and a recently installed debian 8 with lvm that have very different performance;
for example, timing a "cat -file-" (i tried /etc/issue but also /proc/diskstats, so both real fs and memory) gives me a real of 0.005s on the first machine and 10 times more on the second machine.
Another example is that activating (on the second machine) a zabbix agent that monitors disk performance (making a lot of cat and grep on the /proc/diskstats) brings the cpu util to 50% without any other load (while on the old deb7 vm is almost seamless).
I even tried to move this "slow" vm on a new (thick provisioned) LUN without any improvement.
Any hints?
Thanks in advance.
debian lvm xen iscsi xenserver
debian lvm xen iscsi xenserver
asked 3 mins ago
Sandro B.Sandro B.
62
62
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f958365%2fperformance-issue-with-debian-guests-on-xenserver-with-iscsi-storage%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f958365%2fperformance-issue-with-debian-guests-on-xenserver-with-iscsi-storage%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown