Ubuntu 16.04 takes a very long time to configure 2000 virtual IP addressesUse specific interface for outbound...
Why must traveling waves have the same amplitude to form a standing wave?
Current sense amp + op-amp buffer + ADC: Measuring down to 0 with single supply
How do I interpret this "sky cover" chart?
Provisioning profile doesn't include the application-identifier and keychain-access-groups entitlements
Is it possible to upcast ritual spells?
Where is the 1/8 CR apprentice in Volo's Guide to Monsters?
Meaning of "SEVERA INDEOVI VAS" from 3rd Century slab
Is a lawful good "antagonist" effective?
What has been your most complicated TikZ drawing?
Will a pinhole camera work with instant film?
How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?
2D counterpart of std::array in C++17
Is having access to past exams cheating and, if yes, could it be proven just by a good grade?
Did CPM support custom hardware using device drivers?
Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?
How to deal with a cynical class?
Could the Saturn V actually have launched astronauts around Venus?
What is the greatest age difference between a married couple in Tanach?
My adviser wants to be the first author
Why do Australian milk farmers need to protest supermarkets' milk price?
How to generate globally unique ids for different tables of the same database?
Professor being mistaken for a grad student
Is it possible that AIC = BIC?
I need to drive a 7/16" nut but am unsure how to use the socket I bought for my screwdriver
Ubuntu 16.04 takes a very long time to configure 2000 virtual IP addresses
Use specific interface for outbound connections (Ubuntu 9.04)Setting up a static IP address (public) in UbuntuPort foreword + openVPN + iptables?How to setup network interface to have eth0 as dhcp and eth0:1 as static ip?Translating debian network configuration to gentooStatic virtual IP in debian 6.0.4How does IPv6 subnetting work and how does it differ from IPv4 subnetting?Set up Wheezy SubnetsHow to correctly set up routing on machine with 4 interfaces so that three of interfaces are on the same subnet?Networking service timeouts every second restart
As part of some testing I do, I have to configure a 1000 IPv4 addresses and 1000 IPv6 addresses on a linux server. I am doing this on Ubuntu 16.04 (server edition).
After configuring these in /etc/network/interfaces.d/ens192, if I reboot the server, it takes 5 minutes to start the server with the following message on the console:
A start job is running for Raise network interfaces
After that, the server will start up and I can login. systemctl status for networking shows the below 2 error lines:
networking.service: Start operation timed out. Terminating
Failed to start Raise network interfaces.
I can also see that all the 1000 IPv4 addresses were added, but there were only a few 100 IPv6 addresses. If I just wait another 20-30 mins., then all the 1000 IPv6 addresses are added as well.
I've done similar configurations on CentOS7 and the server comes up in mere seconds with all the IP (v4s and v6s) already applied.
So, I'm thinking there is some setting I need to enable/disable to make this move faster.
As a safety and due to some race condition with RAs, I disabled the following based on some articles I found:
net.ipv6.conf.ens160.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens192.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens160.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens192.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens160.autoconf=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens192.autoconf=0
net.ipv6.conf.default.autoconf=0
net.ipv6.conf.all.autoconf=0
Probably, overkill, but, was just trying different things that I found on the net.
Is there anyway to speed this up? Or am I sorely out of luck?
A snippet of some of the lines in the ens192 file:
auto ens192
iface ens192 inet static
address 10.12.12.2
netmask 255.255.255.252
network 10.12.12.0
broadcast 10.12.12.3
gateway 10.12.12.1
iface ens192 inet static
address 10.12.12.11
netmask 255.255.252.0
...
iface ens192 inet6 static
address 2001:10:12:12::2
netmask 64
gateway 2001:10:12:12::1
iface ens192 inet6 static
address 2001:10:12:12::b
netmask 64
...
networking ubuntu-16.04 ethernet
New contributor
add a comment |
As part of some testing I do, I have to configure a 1000 IPv4 addresses and 1000 IPv6 addresses on a linux server. I am doing this on Ubuntu 16.04 (server edition).
After configuring these in /etc/network/interfaces.d/ens192, if I reboot the server, it takes 5 minutes to start the server with the following message on the console:
A start job is running for Raise network interfaces
After that, the server will start up and I can login. systemctl status for networking shows the below 2 error lines:
networking.service: Start operation timed out. Terminating
Failed to start Raise network interfaces.
I can also see that all the 1000 IPv4 addresses were added, but there were only a few 100 IPv6 addresses. If I just wait another 20-30 mins., then all the 1000 IPv6 addresses are added as well.
I've done similar configurations on CentOS7 and the server comes up in mere seconds with all the IP (v4s and v6s) already applied.
So, I'm thinking there is some setting I need to enable/disable to make this move faster.
As a safety and due to some race condition with RAs, I disabled the following based on some articles I found:
net.ipv6.conf.ens160.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens192.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens160.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens192.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens160.autoconf=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens192.autoconf=0
net.ipv6.conf.default.autoconf=0
net.ipv6.conf.all.autoconf=0
Probably, overkill, but, was just trying different things that I found on the net.
Is there anyway to speed this up? Or am I sorely out of luck?
A snippet of some of the lines in the ens192 file:
auto ens192
iface ens192 inet static
address 10.12.12.2
netmask 255.255.255.252
network 10.12.12.0
broadcast 10.12.12.3
gateway 10.12.12.1
iface ens192 inet static
address 10.12.12.11
netmask 255.255.252.0
...
iface ens192 inet6 static
address 2001:10:12:12::2
netmask 64
gateway 2001:10:12:12::1
iface ens192 inet6 static
address 2001:10:12:12::b
netmask 64
...
networking ubuntu-16.04 ethernet
New contributor
add a comment |
As part of some testing I do, I have to configure a 1000 IPv4 addresses and 1000 IPv6 addresses on a linux server. I am doing this on Ubuntu 16.04 (server edition).
After configuring these in /etc/network/interfaces.d/ens192, if I reboot the server, it takes 5 minutes to start the server with the following message on the console:
A start job is running for Raise network interfaces
After that, the server will start up and I can login. systemctl status for networking shows the below 2 error lines:
networking.service: Start operation timed out. Terminating
Failed to start Raise network interfaces.
I can also see that all the 1000 IPv4 addresses were added, but there were only a few 100 IPv6 addresses. If I just wait another 20-30 mins., then all the 1000 IPv6 addresses are added as well.
I've done similar configurations on CentOS7 and the server comes up in mere seconds with all the IP (v4s and v6s) already applied.
So, I'm thinking there is some setting I need to enable/disable to make this move faster.
As a safety and due to some race condition with RAs, I disabled the following based on some articles I found:
net.ipv6.conf.ens160.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens192.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens160.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens192.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens160.autoconf=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens192.autoconf=0
net.ipv6.conf.default.autoconf=0
net.ipv6.conf.all.autoconf=0
Probably, overkill, but, was just trying different things that I found on the net.
Is there anyway to speed this up? Or am I sorely out of luck?
A snippet of some of the lines in the ens192 file:
auto ens192
iface ens192 inet static
address 10.12.12.2
netmask 255.255.255.252
network 10.12.12.0
broadcast 10.12.12.3
gateway 10.12.12.1
iface ens192 inet static
address 10.12.12.11
netmask 255.255.252.0
...
iface ens192 inet6 static
address 2001:10:12:12::2
netmask 64
gateway 2001:10:12:12::1
iface ens192 inet6 static
address 2001:10:12:12::b
netmask 64
...
networking ubuntu-16.04 ethernet
New contributor
As part of some testing I do, I have to configure a 1000 IPv4 addresses and 1000 IPv6 addresses on a linux server. I am doing this on Ubuntu 16.04 (server edition).
After configuring these in /etc/network/interfaces.d/ens192, if I reboot the server, it takes 5 minutes to start the server with the following message on the console:
A start job is running for Raise network interfaces
After that, the server will start up and I can login. systemctl status for networking shows the below 2 error lines:
networking.service: Start operation timed out. Terminating
Failed to start Raise network interfaces.
I can also see that all the 1000 IPv4 addresses were added, but there were only a few 100 IPv6 addresses. If I just wait another 20-30 mins., then all the 1000 IPv6 addresses are added as well.
I've done similar configurations on CentOS7 and the server comes up in mere seconds with all the IP (v4s and v6s) already applied.
So, I'm thinking there is some setting I need to enable/disable to make this move faster.
As a safety and due to some race condition with RAs, I disabled the following based on some articles I found:
net.ipv6.conf.ens160.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens192.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens160.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens192.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens160.autoconf=0
net.ipv6.conf.ens192.autoconf=0
net.ipv6.conf.default.autoconf=0
net.ipv6.conf.all.autoconf=0
Probably, overkill, but, was just trying different things that I found on the net.
Is there anyway to speed this up? Or am I sorely out of luck?
A snippet of some of the lines in the ens192 file:
auto ens192
iface ens192 inet static
address 10.12.12.2
netmask 255.255.255.252
network 10.12.12.0
broadcast 10.12.12.3
gateway 10.12.12.1
iface ens192 inet static
address 10.12.12.11
netmask 255.255.252.0
...
iface ens192 inet6 static
address 2001:10:12:12::2
netmask 64
gateway 2001:10:12:12::1
iface ens192 inet6 static
address 2001:10:12:12::b
netmask 64
...
networking ubuntu-16.04 ethernet
networking ubuntu-16.04 ethernet
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 2 mins ago
bhairav13bhairav13
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
bhairav13 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f958379%2fubuntu-16-04-takes-a-very-long-time-to-configure-2000-virtual-ip-addresses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
bhairav13 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
bhairav13 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
bhairav13 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
bhairav13 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f958379%2fubuntu-16-04-takes-a-very-long-time-to-configure-2000-virtual-ip-addresses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown