Adapting the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) for integers to polynomials Announcing the...
Inverse square law not accurate for non-point masses?
Does the main washing effect of soap come from foam?
Are there any irrational/transcendental numbers for which the distribution of decimal digits is not uniform?
What is the proper term for etching or digging of wall to hide conduit of cables
latest version of QGIS fails to edit attribute table of GeoJSON file
In musical terms, what properties are varied by the human voice to produce different words / syllables?
Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions
What criticisms of Wittgenstein's philosophy of language have been offered?
Is this Half-dragon Quaggoth boss monster balanced?
Where did Ptolemy compare the Earth to the distance of fixed stars?
An isoperimetric-type inequality inside a cube
Centre cell vertically in tabularx
2018 MacBook Pro won't let me install macOS High Sierra 10.13 from USB installer
Is there a verb for listening stealthily?
How to achieve cat-like agility?
Found this skink in my tomato plant bucket. Is he trapped? Or could he leave if he wanted?
A question about the degree of an extension field
Noise in Eigenvalues plot
New Order #6: Easter Egg
Why did Bronn offer to be Tyrion Lannister's champion in trial by combat?
Does the universe have a fixed centre of mass?
Is the time—manner—place ordering of adverbials an oversimplification?
Where and when has Thucydides been studied?
How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?
Adapting the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) for integers to polynomials
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)mod Distributive Law, factoring $!!bmod!!:$ $ abbmod ac = a(bbmod c)$Remainder of polynomial by product of 2 polynomials$f$ dividing by $x + 1$ have remainder 4, when dividing with $x^2 + 1$ have remainder 2x+3. Find remainder dividing polynomial with($x+1$)($x^2+1$)chinese remainder theorem proofChinese Remainder Theorem InterpretationChinese Remainder Theorem clarificationI can't use Chinese Remainder Theorem.Chinese Remainder Theorem for $xequiv 0 pmod{y}$Comparing two statements of Chinese Remainder Theorem (Sun-Ze Theorem)Chinese remainder theorem methodChinese Remainder Theorem problem 7Chinese Remainder Theorem with 0 mod nSolve a system of congruences using the Chinese Remainder Theorem
$begingroup$
I did a few examples using the CRT to solve congruences where everything was in terms of integers. I'm trying to use the same technique for polynomials over $mathbb{Q}$, but I'm getting stuck.
Here's an example with integers:
$begin{cases}x equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , 5) \
x equiv 2 , (mathrm{mod} , 7) \
x equiv 3 , (mathrm{mod} , 9) \
x equiv 4 , (mathrm{mod} , 11).
end{cases}$
Since all the moduli are pairwise relatively prime, we can use the CRT. Here's some notation I'm using:
$bullet , M$ denotes the product of the moduli (in this case, $M = 5 cdot7 cdot 9 cdot 11$)
$bullet , m_i $ denotes the modulus in the $i^{mathrm{th}}$ congruence
$bullet , M_i$ denotes $dfrac{M}{m_i}$
$bullet , y_i$ denotes the inverse of $M_i$ (mod $m_i$), i.e. $y_i$ satisfies $y_i M_i equiv 1$ (mod $m_i$).
Then $x = displaystyle sum_{i = 1}^n a_iM_iy_i$, and this solution is unique (mod $M$).
Now I want to apply the same technique to the following:
$begin{cases}
f(x) equiv 1 , (mathrm{ mod } , x^2 + 1) \
f(x) equiv x , (mathrm{mod} , x^4),
end{cases}$
where $f(x) in mathbb{Q}(x)$. Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime, we should be able to use the CRT. Using the notation above, I have the following:
$M = (x^4)(x^2 + 1)$
$M_1 = x^4$
$M_2 = x^2 + 1$
Here's where I run into a problem. I need to find $y_1, y_2$ such that
$begin{cases}
y_1 (x^4) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^2 + 1) \
y_2 (x^2+1) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^4).
end{cases}$
But how does one find $y_1, y_2$?
abstract-algebra ring-theory chinese-remainder-theorem
asked 5 hours ago
JunglemathJunglemath
6016
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I did a few examples using the CRT to solve congruences where everything was in terms of integers. I'm trying to use the same technique for polynomials over $mathbb{Q}$, but I'm getting stuck.
Here's an example with integers:
$begin{cases}x equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , 5) \
x equiv 2 , (mathrm{mod} , 7) \
x equiv 3 , (mathrm{mod} , 9) \
x equiv 4 , (mathrm{mod} , 11).
end{cases}$
Since all the moduli are pairwise relatively prime, we can use the CRT. Here's some notation I'm using:
$bullet , M$ denotes the product of the moduli (in this case, $M = 5 cdot7 cdot 9 cdot 11$)
$bullet , m_i $ denotes the modulus in the $i^{mathrm{th}}$ congruence
$bullet , M_i$ denotes $dfrac{M}{m_i}$
$bullet , y_i$ denotes the inverse of $M_i$ (mod $m_i$), i.e. $y_i$ satisfies $y_i M_i equiv 1$ (mod $m_i$).
Then $x = displaystyle sum_{i = 1}^n a_iM_iy_i$, and this solution is unique (mod $M$).
Now I want to apply the same technique to the following:
$begin{cases}
f(x) equiv 1 , (mathrm{ mod } , x^2 + 1) \
f(x) equiv x , (mathrm{mod} , x^4),
end{cases}$
where $f(x) in mathbb{Q}(x)$. Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime, we should be able to use the CRT. Using the notation above, I have the following:
$M = (x^4)(x^2 + 1)$
$M_1 = x^4$
$M_2 = x^2 + 1$
Here's where I run into a problem. I need to find $y_1, y_2$ such that
$begin{cases}
y_1 (x^4) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^2 + 1) \
y_2 (x^2+1) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^4).
end{cases}$
But how does one find $y_1, y_2$?
abstract-algebra ring-theory chinese-remainder-theorem
asked 5 hours ago
JunglemathJunglemath
6016
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
"Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime..." but that means precisely that there exist $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ such that $p_1(x)x^4 + p_2(x)(x^2+1)=1$.
$endgroup$
– kccu
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are you saying that I can find $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ in general by using the extended Euclidean algorithm, and that $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ are precisely my $y_1$ and $y_2$?
$endgroup$
– Junglemath
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I did a few examples using the CRT to solve congruences where everything was in terms of integers. I'm trying to use the same technique for polynomials over $mathbb{Q}$, but I'm getting stuck.
Here's an example with integers:
$begin{cases}x equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , 5) \
x equiv 2 , (mathrm{mod} , 7) \
x equiv 3 , (mathrm{mod} , 9) \
x equiv 4 , (mathrm{mod} , 11).
end{cases}$
Since all the moduli are pairwise relatively prime, we can use the CRT. Here's some notation I'm using:
$bullet , M$ denotes the product of the moduli (in this case, $M = 5 cdot7 cdot 9 cdot 11$)
$bullet , m_i $ denotes the modulus in the $i^{mathrm{th}}$ congruence
$bullet , M_i$ denotes $dfrac{M}{m_i}$
$bullet , y_i$ denotes the inverse of $M_i$ (mod $m_i$), i.e. $y_i$ satisfies $y_i M_i equiv 1$ (mod $m_i$).
Then $x = displaystyle sum_{i = 1}^n a_iM_iy_i$, and this solution is unique (mod $M$).
Now I want to apply the same technique to the following:
$begin{cases}
f(x) equiv 1 , (mathrm{ mod } , x^2 + 1) \
f(x) equiv x , (mathrm{mod} , x^4),
end{cases}$
where $f(x) in mathbb{Q}(x)$. Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime, we should be able to use the CRT. Using the notation above, I have the following:
$M = (x^4)(x^2 + 1)$
$M_1 = x^4$
$M_2 = x^2 + 1$
Here's where I run into a problem. I need to find $y_1, y_2$ such that
$begin{cases}
y_1 (x^4) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^2 + 1) \
y_2 (x^2+1) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^4).
end{cases}$
But how does one find $y_1, y_2$?
abstract-algebra ring-theory chinese-remainder-theorem
asked 5 hours ago
JunglemathJunglemath
6016
$endgroup$
I did a few examples using the CRT to solve congruences where everything was in terms of integers. I'm trying to use the same technique for polynomials over $mathbb{Q}$, but I'm getting stuck.
Here's an example with integers:
$begin{cases}x equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , 5) \
x equiv 2 , (mathrm{mod} , 7) \
x equiv 3 , (mathrm{mod} , 9) \
x equiv 4 , (mathrm{mod} , 11).
end{cases}$
Since all the moduli are pairwise relatively prime, we can use the CRT. Here's some notation I'm using:
$bullet , M$ denotes the product of the moduli (in this case, $M = 5 cdot7 cdot 9 cdot 11$)
$bullet , m_i $ denotes the modulus in the $i^{mathrm{th}}$ congruence
$bullet , M_i$ denotes $dfrac{M}{m_i}$
$bullet , y_i$ denotes the inverse of $M_i$ (mod $m_i$), i.e. $y_i$ satisfies $y_i M_i equiv 1$ (mod $m_i$).
Then $x = displaystyle sum_{i = 1}^n a_iM_iy_i$, and this solution is unique (mod $M$).
Now I want to apply the same technique to the following:
$begin{cases}
f(x) equiv 1 , (mathrm{ mod } , x^2 + 1) \
f(x) equiv x , (mathrm{mod} , x^4),
end{cases}$
where $f(x) in mathbb{Q}(x)$. Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime, we should be able to use the CRT. Using the notation above, I have the following:
$M = (x^4)(x^2 + 1)$
$M_1 = x^4$
$M_2 = x^2 + 1$
Here's where I run into a problem. I need to find $y_1, y_2$ such that
$begin{cases}
y_1 (x^4) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^2 + 1) \
y_2 (x^2+1) equiv 1 , (mathrm{mod} , x^4).
end{cases}$
But how does one find $y_1, y_2$?
abstract-algebra ring-theory chinese-remainder-theorem
abstract-algebra ring-theory chinese-remainder-theorem
asked 5 hours ago
JunglemathJunglemath
6016
asked 5 hours ago
JunglemathJunglemath
6016
asked 5 hours ago
JunglemathJunglemath
6016
asked 5 hours ago
JunglemathJunglemath
6016
asked 5 hours ago
JunglemathJunglemath
6016
6016
1
$begingroup$
"Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime..." but that means precisely that there exist $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ such that $p_1(x)x^4 + p_2(x)(x^2+1)=1$.
$endgroup$
– kccu
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are you saying that I can find $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ in general by using the extended Euclidean algorithm, and that $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ are precisely my $y_1$ and $y_2$?
$endgroup$
– Junglemath
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
"Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime..." but that means precisely that there exist $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ such that $p_1(x)x^4 + p_2(x)(x^2+1)=1$.
$endgroup$
– kccu
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are you saying that I can find $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ in general by using the extended Euclidean algorithm, and that $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ are precisely my $y_1$ and $y_2$?
$endgroup$
– Junglemath
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
"Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime..." but that means precisely that there exist $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ such that $p_1(x)x^4 + p_2(x)(x^2+1)=1$.
$endgroup$
– kccu
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime..." but that means precisely that there exist $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ such that $p_1(x)x^4 + p_2(x)(x^2+1)=1$.
$endgroup$
– kccu
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are you saying that I can find $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ in general by using the extended Euclidean algorithm, and that $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ are precisely my $y_1$ and $y_2$?
$endgroup$
– Junglemath
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are you saying that I can find $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ in general by using the extended Euclidean algorithm, and that $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ are precisely my $y_1$ and $y_2$?
$endgroup$
– Junglemath
4 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To find $y_1$ and $y_2$ consider solving the problem
$$y_1x^4+y_2(x^2+1)=1.$$
This is not always easy to solve, but in this case a solution comes to mind. Note that by difference of squares
$$(x^2-1)(x^2+1)=x^4-1,$$
hence
$$x^4+[(-1)(x^2-1)](x^2+1)=1.$$
This tells us that we can choose
$$y_1=1,$$
$$y_2=(1-x^2).$$
answered 5 hours ago
MelodyMelody
1,42212
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is there an algorithmic way of solving these, rather than relying on intuition?
$endgroup$
– Junglemath
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Junglemath By Euclidean algorithm you can find two polynomials $p(x), q(x) in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $p(x) x^4 + q(x) (x^2 + 1) = 1$.
$endgroup$
– Paolo
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath The polynomials over a field form a Euclidean Domain, so yes, there is. If the gcd of $f_1,f_2inmathbb{Q}[x]$ is a unit, then you can perform the Euclidean Algorithm to find their gcd. Now, you can reverse the algorithm to write them as a linear combination of their gcd the same way you would for integers. I said not easy, because the process can be time consuming and very tedious.
$endgroup$
– Melody
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath I didn't really convert it. I knew in advanced the single equation had a solution. This is because $x^4$ and $x^2+1$ have no common roots, hence no common irreducible factors. This means they are relatively prime, in which case we can write $1$ as a linear combination. Knowing that, I knew solving the single equation would give rise to a solution to the congruence equations. This is completely analogous to how you can solve everything over the integers.
$endgroup$
– Melody
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath I describe here at length this method of scaling the Bezout equation into a CRT solution.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Bu applying $ abbmod ac, =, a(bbmod c) $ [Mod Distributive Law] $ $ it is a bit simpler:
$ f-x,bmod, {x^{large 4}(x^{large 2}!+!1)}, =, x^{large 4}underbrace{{left[dfrac{color{#c00}f-x}{color{#0a0}{x^{large 4}}}bmod {x^{large 2}!+!1}right]}}_{large color{#0a0}{x^{Large 4}} equiv 1 {rm by} x^{Large 2} equiv -1 } =, x^{large 4}[1-x], $ by $,color{#c00}fequiv 1pmod{!x^{large 2}!+!1}$
Remark $ $ Here are further examples done using MDL (an operational form of CRT).
You can find further details here on transforming the Bezout equation into a CRT solution (the method sketched in Melody's answer).
answered 3 hours ago
Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque
214k29198660
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196235%2fadapting-the-chinese-remainder-theorem-crt-for-integers-to-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To find $y_1$ and $y_2$ consider solving the problem
$$y_1x^4+y_2(x^2+1)=1.$$
This is not always easy to solve, but in this case a solution comes to mind. Note that by difference of squares
$$(x^2-1)(x^2+1)=x^4-1,$$
hence
$$x^4+[(-1)(x^2-1)](x^2+1)=1.$$
This tells us that we can choose
$$y_1=1,$$
$$y_2=(1-x^2).$$
answered 5 hours ago
MelodyMelody
1,42212
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is there an algorithmic way of solving these, rather than relying on intuition?
$endgroup$
– Junglemath
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Junglemath By Euclidean algorithm you can find two polynomials $p(x), q(x) in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $p(x) x^4 + q(x) (x^2 + 1) = 1$.
$endgroup$
– Paolo
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath The polynomials over a field form a Euclidean Domain, so yes, there is. If the gcd of $f_1,f_2inmathbb{Q}[x]$ is a unit, then you can perform the Euclidean Algorithm to find their gcd. Now, you can reverse the algorithm to write them as a linear combination of their gcd the same way you would for integers. I said not easy, because the process can be time consuming and very tedious.
$endgroup$
– Melody
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath I didn't really convert it. I knew in advanced the single equation had a solution. This is because $x^4$ and $x^2+1$ have no common roots, hence no common irreducible factors. This means they are relatively prime, in which case we can write $1$ as a linear combination. Knowing that, I knew solving the single equation would give rise to a solution to the congruence equations. This is completely analogous to how you can solve everything over the integers.
$endgroup$
– Melody
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath I describe here at length this method of scaling the Bezout equation into a CRT solution.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
To find $y_1$ and $y_2$ consider solving the problem
$$y_1x^4+y_2(x^2+1)=1.$$
This is not always easy to solve, but in this case a solution comes to mind. Note that by difference of squares
$$(x^2-1)(x^2+1)=x^4-1,$$
hence
$$x^4+[(-1)(x^2-1)](x^2+1)=1.$$
This tells us that we can choose
$$y_1=1,$$
$$y_2=(1-x^2).$$
answered 5 hours ago
MelodyMelody
1,42212
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is there an algorithmic way of solving these, rather than relying on intuition?
$endgroup$
– Junglemath
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Junglemath By Euclidean algorithm you can find two polynomials $p(x), q(x) in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $p(x) x^4 + q(x) (x^2 + 1) = 1$.
$endgroup$
– Paolo
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath The polynomials over a field form a Euclidean Domain, so yes, there is. If the gcd of $f_1,f_2inmathbb{Q}[x]$ is a unit, then you can perform the Euclidean Algorithm to find their gcd. Now, you can reverse the algorithm to write them as a linear combination of their gcd the same way you would for integers. I said not easy, because the process can be time consuming and very tedious.
$endgroup$
– Melody
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath I didn't really convert it. I knew in advanced the single equation had a solution. This is because $x^4$ and $x^2+1$ have no common roots, hence no common irreducible factors. This means they are relatively prime, in which case we can write $1$ as a linear combination. Knowing that, I knew solving the single equation would give rise to a solution to the congruence equations. This is completely analogous to how you can solve everything over the integers.
$endgroup$
– Melody
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath I describe here at length this method of scaling the Bezout equation into a CRT solution.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
To find $y_1$ and $y_2$ consider solving the problem
$$y_1x^4+y_2(x^2+1)=1.$$
This is not always easy to solve, but in this case a solution comes to mind. Note that by difference of squares
$$(x^2-1)(x^2+1)=x^4-1,$$
hence
$$x^4+[(-1)(x^2-1)](x^2+1)=1.$$
This tells us that we can choose
$$y_1=1,$$
$$y_2=(1-x^2).$$
answered 5 hours ago
MelodyMelody
1,42212
$endgroup$
To find $y_1$ and $y_2$ consider solving the problem
$$y_1x^4+y_2(x^2+1)=1.$$
This is not always easy to solve, but in this case a solution comes to mind. Note that by difference of squares
$$(x^2-1)(x^2+1)=x^4-1,$$
hence
$$x^4+[(-1)(x^2-1)](x^2+1)=1.$$
This tells us that we can choose
$$y_1=1,$$
$$y_2=(1-x^2).$$
answered 5 hours ago
MelodyMelody
1,42212
edited 4 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
MelodyMelody
1,42212
answered 5 hours ago
MelodyMelody
1,42212
answered 5 hours ago
MelodyMelody
1,42212
1,42212
$begingroup$
Is there an algorithmic way of solving these, rather than relying on intuition?
$endgroup$
– Junglemath
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Junglemath By Euclidean algorithm you can find two polynomials $p(x), q(x) in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $p(x) x^4 + q(x) (x^2 + 1) = 1$.
$endgroup$
– Paolo
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath The polynomials over a field form a Euclidean Domain, so yes, there is. If the gcd of $f_1,f_2inmathbb{Q}[x]$ is a unit, then you can perform the Euclidean Algorithm to find their gcd. Now, you can reverse the algorithm to write them as a linear combination of their gcd the same way you would for integers. I said not easy, because the process can be time consuming and very tedious.
$endgroup$
– Melody
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath I didn't really convert it. I knew in advanced the single equation had a solution. This is because $x^4$ and $x^2+1$ have no common roots, hence no common irreducible factors. This means they are relatively prime, in which case we can write $1$ as a linear combination. Knowing that, I knew solving the single equation would give rise to a solution to the congruence equations. This is completely analogous to how you can solve everything over the integers.
$endgroup$
– Melody
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath I describe here at length this method of scaling the Bezout equation into a CRT solution.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Is there an algorithmic way of solving these, rather than relying on intuition?
$endgroup$
– Junglemath
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Junglemath By Euclidean algorithm you can find two polynomials $p(x), q(x) in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $p(x) x^4 + q(x) (x^2 + 1) = 1$.
$endgroup$
– Paolo
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath The polynomials over a field form a Euclidean Domain, so yes, there is. If the gcd of $f_1,f_2inmathbb{Q}[x]$ is a unit, then you can perform the Euclidean Algorithm to find their gcd. Now, you can reverse the algorithm to write them as a linear combination of their gcd the same way you would for integers. I said not easy, because the process can be time consuming and very tedious.
$endgroup$
– Melody
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath I didn't really convert it. I knew in advanced the single equation had a solution. This is because $x^4$ and $x^2+1$ have no common roots, hence no common irreducible factors. This means they are relatively prime, in which case we can write $1$ as a linear combination. Knowing that, I knew solving the single equation would give rise to a solution to the congruence equations. This is completely analogous to how you can solve everything over the integers.
$endgroup$
– Melody
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath I describe here at length this method of scaling the Bezout equation into a CRT solution.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is there an algorithmic way of solving these, rather than relying on intuition?
$endgroup$
– Junglemath
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is there an algorithmic way of solving these, rather than relying on intuition?
$endgroup$
– Junglemath
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Junglemath By Euclidean algorithm you can find two polynomials $p(x), q(x) in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $p(x) x^4 + q(x) (x^2 + 1) = 1$.
$endgroup$
– Paolo
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Junglemath By Euclidean algorithm you can find two polynomials $p(x), q(x) in mathbb{Q}[x]$ such that $p(x) x^4 + q(x) (x^2 + 1) = 1$.
$endgroup$
– Paolo
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath The polynomials over a field form a Euclidean Domain, so yes, there is. If the gcd of $f_1,f_2inmathbb{Q}[x]$ is a unit, then you can perform the Euclidean Algorithm to find their gcd. Now, you can reverse the algorithm to write them as a linear combination of their gcd the same way you would for integers. I said not easy, because the process can be time consuming and very tedious.
$endgroup$
– Melody
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Junglemath The polynomials over a field form a Euclidean Domain, so yes, there is. If the gcd of $f_1,f_2inmathbb{Q}[x]$ is a unit, then you can perform the Euclidean Algorithm to find their gcd. Now, you can reverse the algorithm to write them as a linear combination of their gcd the same way you would for integers. I said not easy, because the process can be time consuming and very tedious.
$endgroup$
– Melody
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath I didn't really convert it. I knew in advanced the single equation had a solution. This is because $x^4$ and $x^2+1$ have no common roots, hence no common irreducible factors. This means they are relatively prime, in which case we can write $1$ as a linear combination. Knowing that, I knew solving the single equation would give rise to a solution to the congruence equations. This is completely analogous to how you can solve everything over the integers.
$endgroup$
– Melody
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Junglemath I didn't really convert it. I knew in advanced the single equation had a solution. This is because $x^4$ and $x^2+1$ have no common roots, hence no common irreducible factors. This means they are relatively prime, in which case we can write $1$ as a linear combination. Knowing that, I knew solving the single equation would give rise to a solution to the congruence equations. This is completely analogous to how you can solve everything over the integers.
$endgroup$
– Melody
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Junglemath I describe here at length this method of scaling the Bezout equation into a CRT solution.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Junglemath I describe here at length this method of scaling the Bezout equation into a CRT solution.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Bu applying $ abbmod ac, =, a(bbmod c) $ [Mod Distributive Law] $ $ it is a bit simpler:
$ f-x,bmod, {x^{large 4}(x^{large 2}!+!1)}, =, x^{large 4}underbrace{{left[dfrac{color{#c00}f-x}{color{#0a0}{x^{large 4}}}bmod {x^{large 2}!+!1}right]}}_{large color{#0a0}{x^{Large 4}} equiv 1 {rm by} x^{Large 2} equiv -1 } =, x^{large 4}[1-x], $ by $,color{#c00}fequiv 1pmod{!x^{large 2}!+!1}$
Remark $ $ Here are further examples done using MDL (an operational form of CRT).
You can find further details here on transforming the Bezout equation into a CRT solution (the method sketched in Melody's answer).
answered 3 hours ago
Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque
214k29198660
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Bu applying $ abbmod ac, =, a(bbmod c) $ [Mod Distributive Law] $ $ it is a bit simpler:
$ f-x,bmod, {x^{large 4}(x^{large 2}!+!1)}, =, x^{large 4}underbrace{{left[dfrac{color{#c00}f-x}{color{#0a0}{x^{large 4}}}bmod {x^{large 2}!+!1}right]}}_{large color{#0a0}{x^{Large 4}} equiv 1 {rm by} x^{Large 2} equiv -1 } =, x^{large 4}[1-x], $ by $,color{#c00}fequiv 1pmod{!x^{large 2}!+!1}$
Remark $ $ Here are further examples done using MDL (an operational form of CRT).
You can find further details here on transforming the Bezout equation into a CRT solution (the method sketched in Melody's answer).
answered 3 hours ago
Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque
214k29198660
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Bu applying $ abbmod ac, =, a(bbmod c) $ [Mod Distributive Law] $ $ it is a bit simpler:
$ f-x,bmod, {x^{large 4}(x^{large 2}!+!1)}, =, x^{large 4}underbrace{{left[dfrac{color{#c00}f-x}{color{#0a0}{x^{large 4}}}bmod {x^{large 2}!+!1}right]}}_{large color{#0a0}{x^{Large 4}} equiv 1 {rm by} x^{Large 2} equiv -1 } =, x^{large 4}[1-x], $ by $,color{#c00}fequiv 1pmod{!x^{large 2}!+!1}$
Remark $ $ Here are further examples done using MDL (an operational form of CRT).
You can find further details here on transforming the Bezout equation into a CRT solution (the method sketched in Melody's answer).
answered 3 hours ago
Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque
214k29198660
$endgroup$
Bu applying $ abbmod ac, =, a(bbmod c) $ [Mod Distributive Law] $ $ it is a bit simpler:
$ f-x,bmod, {x^{large 4}(x^{large 2}!+!1)}, =, x^{large 4}underbrace{{left[dfrac{color{#c00}f-x}{color{#0a0}{x^{large 4}}}bmod {x^{large 2}!+!1}right]}}_{large color{#0a0}{x^{Large 4}} equiv 1 {rm by} x^{Large 2} equiv -1 } =, x^{large 4}[1-x], $ by $,color{#c00}fequiv 1pmod{!x^{large 2}!+!1}$
Remark $ $ Here are further examples done using MDL (an operational form of CRT).
You can find further details here on transforming the Bezout equation into a CRT solution (the method sketched in Melody's answer).
answered 3 hours ago
Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque
214k29198660
edited 2 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque
214k29198660
answered 3 hours ago
Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque
214k29198660
answered 3 hours ago
Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque
214k29198660
214k29198660
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196235%2fadapting-the-chinese-remainder-theorem-crt-for-integers-to-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
"Having checked that the moduli are relatively prime..." but that means precisely that there exist $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ such that $p_1(x)x^4 + p_2(x)(x^2+1)=1$.
$endgroup$
– kccu
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are you saying that I can find $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ in general by using the extended Euclidean algorithm, and that $p_1(x)$ and $p_2(x)$ are precisely my $y_1$ and $y_2$?
$endgroup$
– Junglemath
4 hours ago