A peculiar integral identityVerification of integral over $exp(cos x + sin x)$Integral $int_0^infty frac{sin...

How do I deal with being envious of my own players?

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

3.5% Interest Student Loan or use all of my savings on Tuition?

Deal the cards to the players

If there are any 3nion, 5nion, 7nion, 9nion, 10nion, etc.

Is there a limit on the maximum number of future jobs queued in an org?

Caulking a corner instead of taping with joint compound?

How to fix my table, centering of columns

Meaning of word ягоза

Where is the fallacy here?

Is there a frame of reference in which I was born before I was conceived?

Can we carry rice to Japan?

GPL code private and stolen

I can't die. Who am I?

Book about a time-travel war fought by computers

How to kill a localhost:8080

Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?

Ahoy, Ye Traveler!

Correct physics behind the colors on CD (compact disc)?

Giving a talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

Redirecting CellPrint output

Did Amazon pay $0 in taxes last year?

Is every open circuit a capacitor?

Plagiarism of code by other PhD student



A peculiar integral identity


Verification of integral over $exp(cos x + sin x)$Integral $int_0^infty frac{sin x}{cosh ax+cos x}frac{x}{x^2-pi^2}dx=tan^{-1}left(frac{1}{a}right)-frac{1}{a}$Sine and Bessel integral extension to imaginary argumentChanging argument into complex in the integral of Bessel multiplied by cosineDerivation of Gradshteyn and Ryzhik integral 3.876.1 (in question)Simpler proof of an integral representation of Bessel function of the first kind $J_n(x)$Fourier Cosine Transform (Parseval Identity) for definite integralA definite integral of the exponential of cosIs there any way to evaluate $int_0^infty cos(bx) sinh(pi x) left[ K_{ix}(a) right]^2 , dx?$A definite integral on a circle with Bessel functions













3












$begingroup$


Here I was, innocently trying to solve this daunting-looking integral



$$int_0^pi e^{v cos theta cos t} cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt $$



when the inner beauty behind this beast slowly started to disclose itself.





Of course, the first thing I did, was checking if WolframAlpha can help, futilely.

Next on my lookup table was Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. Yet again, the god of integrals had no mercy upon me and I was left to my own device.





To get a first impression I plotted the function, that needs to be integrated, that is for $f_{theta}(t) = e^{cos theta cos t} cosh(sin theta sin t)$, we get the following plots:



enter image description here



Okay, nothing too special about that. So I proceeded by trying to numerically evaluate the integral itself. And then, something strange happened...





Turns out the integral is invariant under $theta$!

Even better, we have




$$int_0^pi e^{v cos theta cos t} cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt = int_0^pi e^{v cos t} dt = pi I_0(v)quad forall theta in [-pi,pi]; ,$$




where for the first equality I just set $theta = 0$ and the second equality is a known identity of the modified Bessel function of the first kind. Now, I only stumbled upon this identity numerically, and I was wondering if someone can share some analytical wisdom regarding this. Put into a question:




Does someone know, why this identity holds?






Bonus



I now face the same integral but with an additional linear term, that is



$$int_0^{pi} tf_{theta}(t)dt ; ,$$
with $f_{theta}$ as defined above. I am hoping that the techniques that illuminate the identity above will also shed some light at this new integral, which by the way is not constant in $theta$ anymore.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What's $I_0(v)$?
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @YiFan the modified Bessel function of the first kind.
    $endgroup$
    – chickenNinja123
    3 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Did you try using the fact that $color{blue}{e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t) =frac{1}{2}left(e^{vcos(t-theta)} + e^{vcos(t+theta)}right)}$? (Obtained by using $cosh u = frac{1}{2}left( e^u + e^{-u}right)$ and the cosine addition formulas ($cos(Apm B) = cos A cos B mp sin A sin B$))
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    3 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$


Here I was, innocently trying to solve this daunting-looking integral



$$int_0^pi e^{v cos theta cos t} cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt $$



when the inner beauty behind this beast slowly started to disclose itself.





Of course, the first thing I did, was checking if WolframAlpha can help, futilely.

Next on my lookup table was Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. Yet again, the god of integrals had no mercy upon me and I was left to my own device.





To get a first impression I plotted the function, that needs to be integrated, that is for $f_{theta}(t) = e^{cos theta cos t} cosh(sin theta sin t)$, we get the following plots:



enter image description here



Okay, nothing too special about that. So I proceeded by trying to numerically evaluate the integral itself. And then, something strange happened...





Turns out the integral is invariant under $theta$!

Even better, we have




$$int_0^pi e^{v cos theta cos t} cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt = int_0^pi e^{v cos t} dt = pi I_0(v)quad forall theta in [-pi,pi]; ,$$




where for the first equality I just set $theta = 0$ and the second equality is a known identity of the modified Bessel function of the first kind. Now, I only stumbled upon this identity numerically, and I was wondering if someone can share some analytical wisdom regarding this. Put into a question:




Does someone know, why this identity holds?






Bonus



I now face the same integral but with an additional linear term, that is



$$int_0^{pi} tf_{theta}(t)dt ; ,$$
with $f_{theta}$ as defined above. I am hoping that the techniques that illuminate the identity above will also shed some light at this new integral, which by the way is not constant in $theta$ anymore.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What's $I_0(v)$?
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @YiFan the modified Bessel function of the first kind.
    $endgroup$
    – chickenNinja123
    3 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Did you try using the fact that $color{blue}{e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t) =frac{1}{2}left(e^{vcos(t-theta)} + e^{vcos(t+theta)}right)}$? (Obtained by using $cosh u = frac{1}{2}left( e^u + e^{-u}right)$ and the cosine addition formulas ($cos(Apm B) = cos A cos B mp sin A sin B$))
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    3 hours ago
















3












3








3


2



$begingroup$


Here I was, innocently trying to solve this daunting-looking integral



$$int_0^pi e^{v cos theta cos t} cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt $$



when the inner beauty behind this beast slowly started to disclose itself.





Of course, the first thing I did, was checking if WolframAlpha can help, futilely.

Next on my lookup table was Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. Yet again, the god of integrals had no mercy upon me and I was left to my own device.





To get a first impression I plotted the function, that needs to be integrated, that is for $f_{theta}(t) = e^{cos theta cos t} cosh(sin theta sin t)$, we get the following plots:



enter image description here



Okay, nothing too special about that. So I proceeded by trying to numerically evaluate the integral itself. And then, something strange happened...





Turns out the integral is invariant under $theta$!

Even better, we have




$$int_0^pi e^{v cos theta cos t} cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt = int_0^pi e^{v cos t} dt = pi I_0(v)quad forall theta in [-pi,pi]; ,$$




where for the first equality I just set $theta = 0$ and the second equality is a known identity of the modified Bessel function of the first kind. Now, I only stumbled upon this identity numerically, and I was wondering if someone can share some analytical wisdom regarding this. Put into a question:




Does someone know, why this identity holds?






Bonus



I now face the same integral but with an additional linear term, that is



$$int_0^{pi} tf_{theta}(t)dt ; ,$$
with $f_{theta}$ as defined above. I am hoping that the techniques that illuminate the identity above will also shed some light at this new integral, which by the way is not constant in $theta$ anymore.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Here I was, innocently trying to solve this daunting-looking integral



$$int_0^pi e^{v cos theta cos t} cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt $$



when the inner beauty behind this beast slowly started to disclose itself.





Of course, the first thing I did, was checking if WolframAlpha can help, futilely.

Next on my lookup table was Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. Yet again, the god of integrals had no mercy upon me and I was left to my own device.





To get a first impression I plotted the function, that needs to be integrated, that is for $f_{theta}(t) = e^{cos theta cos t} cosh(sin theta sin t)$, we get the following plots:



enter image description here



Okay, nothing too special about that. So I proceeded by trying to numerically evaluate the integral itself. And then, something strange happened...





Turns out the integral is invariant under $theta$!

Even better, we have




$$int_0^pi e^{v cos theta cos t} cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt = int_0^pi e^{v cos t} dt = pi I_0(v)quad forall theta in [-pi,pi]; ,$$




where for the first equality I just set $theta = 0$ and the second equality is a known identity of the modified Bessel function of the first kind. Now, I only stumbled upon this identity numerically, and I was wondering if someone can share some analytical wisdom regarding this. Put into a question:




Does someone know, why this identity holds?






Bonus



I now face the same integral but with an additional linear term, that is



$$int_0^{pi} tf_{theta}(t)dt ; ,$$
with $f_{theta}$ as defined above. I am hoping that the techniques that illuminate the identity above will also shed some light at this new integral, which by the way is not constant in $theta$ anymore.







integration trigonometry definite-integrals bessel-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago







chickenNinja123

















asked 4 hours ago









chickenNinja123chickenNinja123

9213




9213












  • $begingroup$
    What's $I_0(v)$?
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @YiFan the modified Bessel function of the first kind.
    $endgroup$
    – chickenNinja123
    3 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Did you try using the fact that $color{blue}{e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t) =frac{1}{2}left(e^{vcos(t-theta)} + e^{vcos(t+theta)}right)}$? (Obtained by using $cosh u = frac{1}{2}left( e^u + e^{-u}right)$ and the cosine addition formulas ($cos(Apm B) = cos A cos B mp sin A sin B$))
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    3 hours ago




















  • $begingroup$
    What's $I_0(v)$?
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @YiFan the modified Bessel function of the first kind.
    $endgroup$
    – chickenNinja123
    3 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Did you try using the fact that $color{blue}{e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t) =frac{1}{2}left(e^{vcos(t-theta)} + e^{vcos(t+theta)}right)}$? (Obtained by using $cosh u = frac{1}{2}left( e^u + e^{-u}right)$ and the cosine addition formulas ($cos(Apm B) = cos A cos B mp sin A sin B$))
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    3 hours ago


















$begingroup$
What's $I_0(v)$?
$endgroup$
– YiFan
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
What's $I_0(v)$?
$endgroup$
– YiFan
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
@YiFan the modified Bessel function of the first kind.
$endgroup$
– chickenNinja123
3 hours ago






$begingroup$
@YiFan the modified Bessel function of the first kind.
$endgroup$
– chickenNinja123
3 hours ago














$begingroup$
Did you try using the fact that $color{blue}{e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t) =frac{1}{2}left(e^{vcos(t-theta)} + e^{vcos(t+theta)}right)}$? (Obtained by using $cosh u = frac{1}{2}left( e^u + e^{-u}right)$ and the cosine addition formulas ($cos(Apm B) = cos A cos B mp sin A sin B$))
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
3 hours ago






$begingroup$
Did you try using the fact that $color{blue}{e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t) =frac{1}{2}left(e^{vcos(t-theta)} + e^{vcos(t+theta)}right)}$? (Obtained by using $cosh u = frac{1}{2}left( e^u + e^{-u}right)$ and the cosine addition formulas ($cos(Apm B) = cos A cos B mp sin A sin B$))
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
3 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

For the main problem, a bit of algebra:
begin{align*}e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t) &= e^{vcosthetacos t}left(e^{vsinthetasin t}+e^{-vsinthetasin t}right)\
&= frac12left(e^{vcosthetacos t+vsinthetasin t}+e^{vcosthetacos t-vsinthetasin t}right)\
&= frac12left(e^{vcos(theta-t)}+e^{vcos(theta+t)}right)end{align*}

Now we integrate that:
begin{align*}int_0^{pi}e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t),dt &= frac12int_0^{pi}e^{vcos(theta-t)}+e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt\
&=frac12left(int_0^{pi}e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt+int_{-pi}^{0}e^{vcos(theta+s)},dsright)\
&=frac12int_{-pi}^{pi}e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt = frac12int_{-pi-theta}^{pi-theta}e^{vcos s},dsend{align*}

Flipping $theta-t$ to $theta+s$ gives us an integral over the other half of the period - and it's the same function, so we just write it as one integral. Then, in that final integral of $e^{vcos s}$ over one full period, it doesn't matter where that period is; from $-pi$ to $pi$ is the same as from $-pi-theta$ to $pi-theta$.



That leaves us with the Bessel function identity, that the average value of $e^{vcos t}$ over a full period is $I_0(cos v)$. For this, since Bessel functions are defined by a differential equation, we differentiate (under the integral sign):
begin{align*}I(v) &= frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
I'(v) &= frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}costhetacdot e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
I''(v) &= frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}cos^2thetacdot e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
I'(v) &= frac1{2pi}left[sinthetacdot e^{vcostheta}right]_{theta=0}^{theta=2pi} +frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}sinthetacdot vsinthetacdot e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
I'(v) &= frac{v}{2pi}int_0^{2pi}sin^2thetacdot e^{vcostheta},dthetaend{align*}

The first three lines are $I$ and its derivatives, calculated the obvious way. Then, in the next two, we apply integration by parts to transform the $I'$ integral into a form that works better with the others. Then, from $cos^2+sin^2=1$, we get $vI''(v)+I'(v)-vI(v)=0$, the modified Bessel equation of order zero. Together with the initial condition $I(0)=1$ (since the average value of $1$ is $1$) and $I'(0)=0$, this gives that $I(v)=I_0(v)$. Done.



A brief note on the bonus question: we can apply the same identities, but we run into trouble when we try to fold over and transform the $e^{vcos(theta-t)}$ term into an integral over $[-pi,0]$. The way the $t$ factor transforms, we end up with
$$frac12int_{-pi}^{pi}|t|cdot e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt$$
Multiplying by a triangle wave isn't going to come out cleanly. I might look at Fourier series next, but not in this answer.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Note that
    $$begin{align*}
    I_theta &= frac14int_0^{2pi}e^{vcosthetacos t}left(e^{vsinthetasin t}+e^{-vsinthetasin t}right) mathrm dt\&=frac14int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t-theta)} mathrm dt+frac14int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t+theta)} mathrm dt.
    end{align*}$$
    Because $tmapsto e^{vcos t}$ is $2pi$-periodic, we have
    $$
    int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t-theta)} mathrm dt=int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t+theta)} mathrm dt=int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos t} mathrm dt
    $$
    so it follows that
    $$
    I_theta = frac 12int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos t} mathrm dt =int_0^pi e^{vcos t} mathrm dt.
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3138187%2fa-peculiar-integral-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      For the main problem, a bit of algebra:
      begin{align*}e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t) &= e^{vcosthetacos t}left(e^{vsinthetasin t}+e^{-vsinthetasin t}right)\
      &= frac12left(e^{vcosthetacos t+vsinthetasin t}+e^{vcosthetacos t-vsinthetasin t}right)\
      &= frac12left(e^{vcos(theta-t)}+e^{vcos(theta+t)}right)end{align*}

      Now we integrate that:
      begin{align*}int_0^{pi}e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t),dt &= frac12int_0^{pi}e^{vcos(theta-t)}+e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt\
      &=frac12left(int_0^{pi}e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt+int_{-pi}^{0}e^{vcos(theta+s)},dsright)\
      &=frac12int_{-pi}^{pi}e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt = frac12int_{-pi-theta}^{pi-theta}e^{vcos s},dsend{align*}

      Flipping $theta-t$ to $theta+s$ gives us an integral over the other half of the period - and it's the same function, so we just write it as one integral. Then, in that final integral of $e^{vcos s}$ over one full period, it doesn't matter where that period is; from $-pi$ to $pi$ is the same as from $-pi-theta$ to $pi-theta$.



      That leaves us with the Bessel function identity, that the average value of $e^{vcos t}$ over a full period is $I_0(cos v)$. For this, since Bessel functions are defined by a differential equation, we differentiate (under the integral sign):
      begin{align*}I(v) &= frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
      I'(v) &= frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}costhetacdot e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
      I''(v) &= frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}cos^2thetacdot e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
      I'(v) &= frac1{2pi}left[sinthetacdot e^{vcostheta}right]_{theta=0}^{theta=2pi} +frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}sinthetacdot vsinthetacdot e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
      I'(v) &= frac{v}{2pi}int_0^{2pi}sin^2thetacdot e^{vcostheta},dthetaend{align*}

      The first three lines are $I$ and its derivatives, calculated the obvious way. Then, in the next two, we apply integration by parts to transform the $I'$ integral into a form that works better with the others. Then, from $cos^2+sin^2=1$, we get $vI''(v)+I'(v)-vI(v)=0$, the modified Bessel equation of order zero. Together with the initial condition $I(0)=1$ (since the average value of $1$ is $1$) and $I'(0)=0$, this gives that $I(v)=I_0(v)$. Done.



      A brief note on the bonus question: we can apply the same identities, but we run into trouble when we try to fold over and transform the $e^{vcos(theta-t)}$ term into an integral over $[-pi,0]$. The way the $t$ factor transforms, we end up with
      $$frac12int_{-pi}^{pi}|t|cdot e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt$$
      Multiplying by a triangle wave isn't going to come out cleanly. I might look at Fourier series next, but not in this answer.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        3












        $begingroup$

        For the main problem, a bit of algebra:
        begin{align*}e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t) &= e^{vcosthetacos t}left(e^{vsinthetasin t}+e^{-vsinthetasin t}right)\
        &= frac12left(e^{vcosthetacos t+vsinthetasin t}+e^{vcosthetacos t-vsinthetasin t}right)\
        &= frac12left(e^{vcos(theta-t)}+e^{vcos(theta+t)}right)end{align*}

        Now we integrate that:
        begin{align*}int_0^{pi}e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t),dt &= frac12int_0^{pi}e^{vcos(theta-t)}+e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt\
        &=frac12left(int_0^{pi}e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt+int_{-pi}^{0}e^{vcos(theta+s)},dsright)\
        &=frac12int_{-pi}^{pi}e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt = frac12int_{-pi-theta}^{pi-theta}e^{vcos s},dsend{align*}

        Flipping $theta-t$ to $theta+s$ gives us an integral over the other half of the period - and it's the same function, so we just write it as one integral. Then, in that final integral of $e^{vcos s}$ over one full period, it doesn't matter where that period is; from $-pi$ to $pi$ is the same as from $-pi-theta$ to $pi-theta$.



        That leaves us with the Bessel function identity, that the average value of $e^{vcos t}$ over a full period is $I_0(cos v)$. For this, since Bessel functions are defined by a differential equation, we differentiate (under the integral sign):
        begin{align*}I(v) &= frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
        I'(v) &= frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}costhetacdot e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
        I''(v) &= frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}cos^2thetacdot e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
        I'(v) &= frac1{2pi}left[sinthetacdot e^{vcostheta}right]_{theta=0}^{theta=2pi} +frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}sinthetacdot vsinthetacdot e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
        I'(v) &= frac{v}{2pi}int_0^{2pi}sin^2thetacdot e^{vcostheta},dthetaend{align*}

        The first three lines are $I$ and its derivatives, calculated the obvious way. Then, in the next two, we apply integration by parts to transform the $I'$ integral into a form that works better with the others. Then, from $cos^2+sin^2=1$, we get $vI''(v)+I'(v)-vI(v)=0$, the modified Bessel equation of order zero. Together with the initial condition $I(0)=1$ (since the average value of $1$ is $1$) and $I'(0)=0$, this gives that $I(v)=I_0(v)$. Done.



        A brief note on the bonus question: we can apply the same identities, but we run into trouble when we try to fold over and transform the $e^{vcos(theta-t)}$ term into an integral over $[-pi,0]$. The way the $t$ factor transforms, we end up with
        $$frac12int_{-pi}^{pi}|t|cdot e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt$$
        Multiplying by a triangle wave isn't going to come out cleanly. I might look at Fourier series next, but not in this answer.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          For the main problem, a bit of algebra:
          begin{align*}e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t) &= e^{vcosthetacos t}left(e^{vsinthetasin t}+e^{-vsinthetasin t}right)\
          &= frac12left(e^{vcosthetacos t+vsinthetasin t}+e^{vcosthetacos t-vsinthetasin t}right)\
          &= frac12left(e^{vcos(theta-t)}+e^{vcos(theta+t)}right)end{align*}

          Now we integrate that:
          begin{align*}int_0^{pi}e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t),dt &= frac12int_0^{pi}e^{vcos(theta-t)}+e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt\
          &=frac12left(int_0^{pi}e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt+int_{-pi}^{0}e^{vcos(theta+s)},dsright)\
          &=frac12int_{-pi}^{pi}e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt = frac12int_{-pi-theta}^{pi-theta}e^{vcos s},dsend{align*}

          Flipping $theta-t$ to $theta+s$ gives us an integral over the other half of the period - and it's the same function, so we just write it as one integral. Then, in that final integral of $e^{vcos s}$ over one full period, it doesn't matter where that period is; from $-pi$ to $pi$ is the same as from $-pi-theta$ to $pi-theta$.



          That leaves us with the Bessel function identity, that the average value of $e^{vcos t}$ over a full period is $I_0(cos v)$. For this, since Bessel functions are defined by a differential equation, we differentiate (under the integral sign):
          begin{align*}I(v) &= frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
          I'(v) &= frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}costhetacdot e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
          I''(v) &= frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}cos^2thetacdot e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
          I'(v) &= frac1{2pi}left[sinthetacdot e^{vcostheta}right]_{theta=0}^{theta=2pi} +frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}sinthetacdot vsinthetacdot e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
          I'(v) &= frac{v}{2pi}int_0^{2pi}sin^2thetacdot e^{vcostheta},dthetaend{align*}

          The first three lines are $I$ and its derivatives, calculated the obvious way. Then, in the next two, we apply integration by parts to transform the $I'$ integral into a form that works better with the others. Then, from $cos^2+sin^2=1$, we get $vI''(v)+I'(v)-vI(v)=0$, the modified Bessel equation of order zero. Together with the initial condition $I(0)=1$ (since the average value of $1$ is $1$) and $I'(0)=0$, this gives that $I(v)=I_0(v)$. Done.



          A brief note on the bonus question: we can apply the same identities, but we run into trouble when we try to fold over and transform the $e^{vcos(theta-t)}$ term into an integral over $[-pi,0]$. The way the $t$ factor transforms, we end up with
          $$frac12int_{-pi}^{pi}|t|cdot e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt$$
          Multiplying by a triangle wave isn't going to come out cleanly. I might look at Fourier series next, but not in this answer.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          For the main problem, a bit of algebra:
          begin{align*}e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t) &= e^{vcosthetacos t}left(e^{vsinthetasin t}+e^{-vsinthetasin t}right)\
          &= frac12left(e^{vcosthetacos t+vsinthetasin t}+e^{vcosthetacos t-vsinthetasin t}right)\
          &= frac12left(e^{vcos(theta-t)}+e^{vcos(theta+t)}right)end{align*}

          Now we integrate that:
          begin{align*}int_0^{pi}e^{vcosthetacos t}cosh(vsinthetasin t),dt &= frac12int_0^{pi}e^{vcos(theta-t)}+e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt\
          &=frac12left(int_0^{pi}e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt+int_{-pi}^{0}e^{vcos(theta+s)},dsright)\
          &=frac12int_{-pi}^{pi}e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt = frac12int_{-pi-theta}^{pi-theta}e^{vcos s},dsend{align*}

          Flipping $theta-t$ to $theta+s$ gives us an integral over the other half of the period - and it's the same function, so we just write it as one integral. Then, in that final integral of $e^{vcos s}$ over one full period, it doesn't matter where that period is; from $-pi$ to $pi$ is the same as from $-pi-theta$ to $pi-theta$.



          That leaves us with the Bessel function identity, that the average value of $e^{vcos t}$ over a full period is $I_0(cos v)$. For this, since Bessel functions are defined by a differential equation, we differentiate (under the integral sign):
          begin{align*}I(v) &= frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
          I'(v) &= frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}costhetacdot e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
          I''(v) &= frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}cos^2thetacdot e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
          I'(v) &= frac1{2pi}left[sinthetacdot e^{vcostheta}right]_{theta=0}^{theta=2pi} +frac1{2pi}int_0^{2pi}sinthetacdot vsinthetacdot e^{vcostheta},dtheta\
          I'(v) &= frac{v}{2pi}int_0^{2pi}sin^2thetacdot e^{vcostheta},dthetaend{align*}

          The first three lines are $I$ and its derivatives, calculated the obvious way. Then, in the next two, we apply integration by parts to transform the $I'$ integral into a form that works better with the others. Then, from $cos^2+sin^2=1$, we get $vI''(v)+I'(v)-vI(v)=0$, the modified Bessel equation of order zero. Together with the initial condition $I(0)=1$ (since the average value of $1$ is $1$) and $I'(0)=0$, this gives that $I(v)=I_0(v)$. Done.



          A brief note on the bonus question: we can apply the same identities, but we run into trouble when we try to fold over and transform the $e^{vcos(theta-t)}$ term into an integral over $[-pi,0]$. The way the $t$ factor transforms, we end up with
          $$frac12int_{-pi}^{pi}|t|cdot e^{vcos(theta+t)},dt$$
          Multiplying by a triangle wave isn't going to come out cleanly. I might look at Fourier series next, but not in this answer.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          jmerryjmerry

          12.3k1628




          12.3k1628























              2












              $begingroup$

              Note that
              $$begin{align*}
              I_theta &= frac14int_0^{2pi}e^{vcosthetacos t}left(e^{vsinthetasin t}+e^{-vsinthetasin t}right) mathrm dt\&=frac14int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t-theta)} mathrm dt+frac14int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t+theta)} mathrm dt.
              end{align*}$$
              Because $tmapsto e^{vcos t}$ is $2pi$-periodic, we have
              $$
              int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t-theta)} mathrm dt=int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t+theta)} mathrm dt=int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos t} mathrm dt
              $$
              so it follows that
              $$
              I_theta = frac 12int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos t} mathrm dt =int_0^pi e^{vcos t} mathrm dt.
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                Note that
                $$begin{align*}
                I_theta &= frac14int_0^{2pi}e^{vcosthetacos t}left(e^{vsinthetasin t}+e^{-vsinthetasin t}right) mathrm dt\&=frac14int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t-theta)} mathrm dt+frac14int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t+theta)} mathrm dt.
                end{align*}$$
                Because $tmapsto e^{vcos t}$ is $2pi$-periodic, we have
                $$
                int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t-theta)} mathrm dt=int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t+theta)} mathrm dt=int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos t} mathrm dt
                $$
                so it follows that
                $$
                I_theta = frac 12int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos t} mathrm dt =int_0^pi e^{vcos t} mathrm dt.
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Note that
                  $$begin{align*}
                  I_theta &= frac14int_0^{2pi}e^{vcosthetacos t}left(e^{vsinthetasin t}+e^{-vsinthetasin t}right) mathrm dt\&=frac14int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t-theta)} mathrm dt+frac14int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t+theta)} mathrm dt.
                  end{align*}$$
                  Because $tmapsto e^{vcos t}$ is $2pi$-periodic, we have
                  $$
                  int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t-theta)} mathrm dt=int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t+theta)} mathrm dt=int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos t} mathrm dt
                  $$
                  so it follows that
                  $$
                  I_theta = frac 12int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos t} mathrm dt =int_0^pi e^{vcos t} mathrm dt.
                  $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Note that
                  $$begin{align*}
                  I_theta &= frac14int_0^{2pi}e^{vcosthetacos t}left(e^{vsinthetasin t}+e^{-vsinthetasin t}right) mathrm dt\&=frac14int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t-theta)} mathrm dt+frac14int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t+theta)} mathrm dt.
                  end{align*}$$
                  Because $tmapsto e^{vcos t}$ is $2pi$-periodic, we have
                  $$
                  int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t-theta)} mathrm dt=int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos(t+theta)} mathrm dt=int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos t} mathrm dt
                  $$
                  so it follows that
                  $$
                  I_theta = frac 12int_0^{2pi}e^{vcos t} mathrm dt =int_0^pi e^{vcos t} mathrm dt.
                  $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 3 hours ago









                  SimonSimon

                  1294




                  1294






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3138187%2fa-peculiar-integral-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Фонтен-ла-Гаярд Зміст Демографія | Економіка | Посилання |...

                      Список ссавців Італії Природоохоронні статуси | Список |...

                      Маріан Котлеба Зміст Життєпис | Політичні погляди |...