Is the set of paths between any two points moving only in units on the plane countable or uncountable?The set...

How do I construct an nxn matrix?

Where was Karl Mordo in Infinity War?

How to speed up a process

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

What to do when being responsible for data protection in your lab, yet advice is ignored?

Magento 2: Override XML file from vendor folder to app folder doesn't work/update

Can you use a beast's innate abilities while polymorphed?

What do the pedals on grand pianos do?

Did 5.25" floppies undergo a change in magnetic coating?

Easy code troubleshooting in wordpress

CBP Reminds Travelers to Allow 72 Hours for ESTA. Why?

What is this waxed root vegetable?

Is there a frame of reference in which I was born before I was conceived?

How can atoms be electrically neutral when there is a difference in the positions of the charges?

Understanding Kramnik's play in game 1 of Candidates 2018

If a druid in Wild Shape swallows a creature whole, then turns back to her normal form, what happens?

How would we write a misogynistic character without offending people?

Difference between 小吃 and 零食

Why does Starman/Roadster have radial acceleration?

It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)

How to properly claim credit for peer review?

Sometimes a banana is just a banana

Compare four integers, return word based on maximum



Is the set of paths between any two points moving only in units on the plane countable or uncountable?


The set of points that are equdistiant from two circlesproof of the fact that the set of points equidistant from sides of an angle form a bisector of the angleFinding a point between two points given the points and a distanceWhat is the smaller angle made by the two radial paths?Compute the angle between a line and a plane if the line forms the angles of 45 degrees and 60 degrees with two perpendicular lines lying in the planeProve any line passes through at least two pointsHow many points are possible in the plane that are the same distance from all three points.Existence of a point between two points in Hilbert geometryPoints moving towards the nearest point, where will they meet?Shortest distance between two points , when you can't cross sphere in the middle













3












$begingroup$


Consider 2 arbitrary, fixed points A and B on the plane. Suppose you can move from point A in unit distance at any angle to another point and from this point you can again travel a unit distance at any angle to another point and so on. Ultimately your goal is to travel from point A to point B along a path of unit-distance line segments without repeating a point during your journey. Is the set of such paths countable or uncountable?



I believe it is uncountable and here is my thought process, but I'm not sure of my logic. Consider the line between the two points equidistant from them; call this line L. A path of only unit distances can be made between A and any point, P, which lies on L without crossing L(I don't know how to prove this statement but it seems true). This path can be mirrored on the other side of L to connect B to P. Thus for any point, P, which lies on L a path can be made from A to B crossing through P halfway through the path. Since the points on L are uncountable the set of paths between A and B are also uncountable.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Consider 2 arbitrary, fixed points A and B on the plane. Suppose you can move from point A in unit distance at any angle to another point and from this point you can again travel a unit distance at any angle to another point and so on. Ultimately your goal is to travel from point A to point B along a path of unit-distance line segments without repeating a point during your journey. Is the set of such paths countable or uncountable?



    I believe it is uncountable and here is my thought process, but I'm not sure of my logic. Consider the line between the two points equidistant from them; call this line L. A path of only unit distances can be made between A and any point, P, which lies on L without crossing L(I don't know how to prove this statement but it seems true). This path can be mirrored on the other side of L to connect B to P. Thus for any point, P, which lies on L a path can be made from A to B crossing through P halfway through the path. Since the points on L are uncountable the set of paths between A and B are also uncountable.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      Consider 2 arbitrary, fixed points A and B on the plane. Suppose you can move from point A in unit distance at any angle to another point and from this point you can again travel a unit distance at any angle to another point and so on. Ultimately your goal is to travel from point A to point B along a path of unit-distance line segments without repeating a point during your journey. Is the set of such paths countable or uncountable?



      I believe it is uncountable and here is my thought process, but I'm not sure of my logic. Consider the line between the two points equidistant from them; call this line L. A path of only unit distances can be made between A and any point, P, which lies on L without crossing L(I don't know how to prove this statement but it seems true). This path can be mirrored on the other side of L to connect B to P. Thus for any point, P, which lies on L a path can be made from A to B crossing through P halfway through the path. Since the points on L are uncountable the set of paths between A and B are also uncountable.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Consider 2 arbitrary, fixed points A and B on the plane. Suppose you can move from point A in unit distance at any angle to another point and from this point you can again travel a unit distance at any angle to another point and so on. Ultimately your goal is to travel from point A to point B along a path of unit-distance line segments without repeating a point during your journey. Is the set of such paths countable or uncountable?



      I believe it is uncountable and here is my thought process, but I'm not sure of my logic. Consider the line between the two points equidistant from them; call this line L. A path of only unit distances can be made between A and any point, P, which lies on L without crossing L(I don't know how to prove this statement but it seems true). This path can be mirrored on the other side of L to connect B to P. Thus for any point, P, which lies on L a path can be made from A to B crossing through P halfway through the path. Since the points on L are uncountable the set of paths between A and B are also uncountable.







      geometry elementary-set-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago









      Andrés E. Caicedo

      65.6k8159250




      65.6k8159250










      asked 4 hours ago









      Knight98Knight98

      253




      253






















          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Yes, this looks convincing. For the missing step, go directly from A towards P in unit steps until the distance left is less than 2. Then use the remaining distance as the base of an isosceles triangle with unit legs, which you make point away from L.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            Let $C$ be on the line through $B$ that is perpendicular to the segment $AB$ with the distance $BC$ equal to $1/2.$ Take any half-line $L$, not through $B$, that originates at $A$ and intersects the segment $BC.$ For some $nin Bbb N$ there is a path along $L,$ starting at $A,$ determined by $n$ points $A=A_1,...,A_n$ where $A_j,A_{j+1}$ are distance $1$ apart for each $j<n,$ and such that the distance from $A_n$ to $B$ is less than $1.$



            Let the point $D$ be such that $A_nD=BD=1$ nd $Dnot in {A_1,...,A_n}.$ Then the path determined by ${A_1,...,A_n}cup {D}$ is a path of the desired type.



            The cardinal of the set all such $L$ is $2^{aleph_0}$ so there at least this many paths of the desired type, joining pairs of points .



            And each path is determined by a function from some ${1,2,...,m}subset Bbb N$ into $Bbb R^2.$ The set of all such functions has cardinal $2^{aleph_0}$ so there are at most $2^{aleph_0}$ paths of the desired type.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$





















              2












              $begingroup$

              Go one unit from a at an angle of t to c.

              Go in unit steps along ca until one is less than a unit away from b to a point p.

              If p /= b, then draw a triangle with base pb and sides of unit length adding the sides as the final steps.



              As for each t in [0,2$pi$), I've constructed a different accepted zigzaging from a to b, there are uncountably many ways of so staggering from a to b.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$





















                0












                $begingroup$

                I believe it is uncountable also, and here is my thought process:



                For each direction vector $vinBbb R^2=T_aBbb R^2$, take a curve $alpha_v$ from $a$ to $b$ with $alpha_v'(0)=v$.



                Then if $vneq w$, we have $alpha_vneqalpha_w$.



                But clearly there are uncountably many direction vectors in $Bbb R^2=T_aBbb R^2$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  It seems OP wants movements made of straight line segments all of length $1,$ to go from fixed $A$ to fixed $b$ points. [rather than curves as you use]
                  $endgroup$
                  – coffeemath
                  4 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  I did notice that. But I thought, well, straight lines have derivatives. @coffeemath
                  $endgroup$
                  – Chris Custer
                  2 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  Cris-- Then to finish one has to show that after the first initial unit straight line step from $A,$ it is possible to continue such steps and somehow arrive at $B.$
                  $endgroup$
                  – coffeemath
                  2 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  @coffeemath yes. Well there certainly appear to be some details missing. But this seems fairly reasonable. Thanks.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Chris Custer
                  2 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  William Elliot's answer does this.
                  $endgroup$
                  – coffeemath
                  1 hour ago



















                0












                $begingroup$

                Your proof is correct. We can fill in the details on the first part: For any two distinct points $A$ and $B$ in the plane, we can construct a path consisting of unit distances from $A$ to $B$.



                If $A$ is more than one unit away from $B$, start at $A$ and take unit steps toward $B$ until we are less than one unit from $B$. If $B$ is a whole number of steps away, we will land on $B$. If not, we will land on a point $P$ within the unit circle centered at $B$. Since $P$ is less than a distance of $1$ away from $B$, the unit circle centered at $P$ will intersect the unit circle centered at $B$ in two places. Take one step from $P$ to an intersection point and then one step from the intersection point to $B$ to finish the path.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$





















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  Yes, and here is a very simple and intuitive argument without mirrors ;-)



                  Observation:




                  • Let C be any point on AB such that 0< |AC| < min( |AB|, 2)

                  • We can always travel from A to C in 2 x 1-unit steps. (Construct an appropriate unit side isosceles triangle to a point X on the perpendicular bisector of AC such that |AX| = |XC| = 1).

                  • We can then travel from C to B in < |AB| unit steps.

                  • So all such paths (whatever value of C we chose) will traverse AXCB in < (|AB| + 2) steps, and all such paths are distinct if their respective C' and C are distinct.


                  But as C can be any real number in that range of real numbers, the number of distinct C we could have chosen is uncountable. Each C gives a unique valid path, so the number of paths in uncountable.



                  The followup question would be the cardinality involved. There is a chance it might be more than aleph_0 - but that's far beyond my skill to figure out.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$













                    Your Answer





                    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                    });
                    });
                    }, "mathjax-editing");

                    StackExchange.ready(function() {
                    var channelOptions = {
                    tags: "".split(" "),
                    id: "69"
                    };
                    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                    createEditor();
                    });
                    }
                    else {
                    createEditor();
                    }
                    });

                    function createEditor() {
                    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                    heartbeatType: 'answer',
                    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                    convertImagesToLinks: true,
                    noModals: true,
                    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                    reputationToPostImages: 10,
                    bindNavPrevention: true,
                    postfix: "",
                    imageUploader: {
                    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                    allowUrls: true
                    },
                    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                    });


                    }
                    });














                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3135697%2fis-the-set-of-paths-between-any-two-points-moving-only-in-units-on-the-plane-cou%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown

























                    6 Answers
                    6






                    active

                    oldest

                    votes








                    6 Answers
                    6






                    active

                    oldest

                    votes









                    active

                    oldest

                    votes






                    active

                    oldest

                    votes









                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    Yes, this looks convincing. For the missing step, go directly from A towards P in unit steps until the distance left is less than 2. Then use the remaining distance as the base of an isosceles triangle with unit legs, which you make point away from L.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$


















                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Yes, this looks convincing. For the missing step, go directly from A towards P in unit steps until the distance left is less than 2. Then use the remaining distance as the base of an isosceles triangle with unit legs, which you make point away from L.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$
















                        3












                        3








                        3





                        $begingroup$

                        Yes, this looks convincing. For the missing step, go directly from A towards P in unit steps until the distance left is less than 2. Then use the remaining distance as the base of an isosceles triangle with unit legs, which you make point away from L.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



                        Yes, this looks convincing. For the missing step, go directly from A towards P in unit steps until the distance left is less than 2. Then use the remaining distance as the base of an isosceles triangle with unit legs, which you make point away from L.







                        share|cite|improve this answer












                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer










                        answered 4 hours ago









                        Henning MakholmHenning Makholm

                        241k17308547




                        241k17308547























                            2












                            $begingroup$

                            Let $C$ be on the line through $B$ that is perpendicular to the segment $AB$ with the distance $BC$ equal to $1/2.$ Take any half-line $L$, not through $B$, that originates at $A$ and intersects the segment $BC.$ For some $nin Bbb N$ there is a path along $L,$ starting at $A,$ determined by $n$ points $A=A_1,...,A_n$ where $A_j,A_{j+1}$ are distance $1$ apart for each $j<n,$ and such that the distance from $A_n$ to $B$ is less than $1.$



                            Let the point $D$ be such that $A_nD=BD=1$ nd $Dnot in {A_1,...,A_n}.$ Then the path determined by ${A_1,...,A_n}cup {D}$ is a path of the desired type.



                            The cardinal of the set all such $L$ is $2^{aleph_0}$ so there at least this many paths of the desired type, joining pairs of points .



                            And each path is determined by a function from some ${1,2,...,m}subset Bbb N$ into $Bbb R^2.$ The set of all such functions has cardinal $2^{aleph_0}$ so there are at most $2^{aleph_0}$ paths of the desired type.






                            share|cite|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$


















                              2












                              $begingroup$

                              Let $C$ be on the line through $B$ that is perpendicular to the segment $AB$ with the distance $BC$ equal to $1/2.$ Take any half-line $L$, not through $B$, that originates at $A$ and intersects the segment $BC.$ For some $nin Bbb N$ there is a path along $L,$ starting at $A,$ determined by $n$ points $A=A_1,...,A_n$ where $A_j,A_{j+1}$ are distance $1$ apart for each $j<n,$ and such that the distance from $A_n$ to $B$ is less than $1.$



                              Let the point $D$ be such that $A_nD=BD=1$ nd $Dnot in {A_1,...,A_n}.$ Then the path determined by ${A_1,...,A_n}cup {D}$ is a path of the desired type.



                              The cardinal of the set all such $L$ is $2^{aleph_0}$ so there at least this many paths of the desired type, joining pairs of points .



                              And each path is determined by a function from some ${1,2,...,m}subset Bbb N$ into $Bbb R^2.$ The set of all such functions has cardinal $2^{aleph_0}$ so there are at most $2^{aleph_0}$ paths of the desired type.






                              share|cite|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$
















                                2












                                2








                                2





                                $begingroup$

                                Let $C$ be on the line through $B$ that is perpendicular to the segment $AB$ with the distance $BC$ equal to $1/2.$ Take any half-line $L$, not through $B$, that originates at $A$ and intersects the segment $BC.$ For some $nin Bbb N$ there is a path along $L,$ starting at $A,$ determined by $n$ points $A=A_1,...,A_n$ where $A_j,A_{j+1}$ are distance $1$ apart for each $j<n,$ and such that the distance from $A_n$ to $B$ is less than $1.$



                                Let the point $D$ be such that $A_nD=BD=1$ nd $Dnot in {A_1,...,A_n}.$ Then the path determined by ${A_1,...,A_n}cup {D}$ is a path of the desired type.



                                The cardinal of the set all such $L$ is $2^{aleph_0}$ so there at least this many paths of the desired type, joining pairs of points .



                                And each path is determined by a function from some ${1,2,...,m}subset Bbb N$ into $Bbb R^2.$ The set of all such functions has cardinal $2^{aleph_0}$ so there are at most $2^{aleph_0}$ paths of the desired type.






                                share|cite|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$



                                Let $C$ be on the line through $B$ that is perpendicular to the segment $AB$ with the distance $BC$ equal to $1/2.$ Take any half-line $L$, not through $B$, that originates at $A$ and intersects the segment $BC.$ For some $nin Bbb N$ there is a path along $L,$ starting at $A,$ determined by $n$ points $A=A_1,...,A_n$ where $A_j,A_{j+1}$ are distance $1$ apart for each $j<n,$ and such that the distance from $A_n$ to $B$ is less than $1.$



                                Let the point $D$ be such that $A_nD=BD=1$ nd $Dnot in {A_1,...,A_n}.$ Then the path determined by ${A_1,...,A_n}cup {D}$ is a path of the desired type.



                                The cardinal of the set all such $L$ is $2^{aleph_0}$ so there at least this many paths of the desired type, joining pairs of points .



                                And each path is determined by a function from some ${1,2,...,m}subset Bbb N$ into $Bbb R^2.$ The set of all such functions has cardinal $2^{aleph_0}$ so there are at most $2^{aleph_0}$ paths of the desired type.







                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                share|cite|improve this answer








                                edited 3 hours ago

























                                answered 3 hours ago









                                DanielWainfleetDanielWainfleet

                                35.3k31648




                                35.3k31648























                                    2












                                    $begingroup$

                                    Go one unit from a at an angle of t to c.

                                    Go in unit steps along ca until one is less than a unit away from b to a point p.

                                    If p /= b, then draw a triangle with base pb and sides of unit length adding the sides as the final steps.



                                    As for each t in [0,2$pi$), I've constructed a different accepted zigzaging from a to b, there are uncountably many ways of so staggering from a to b.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$


















                                      2












                                      $begingroup$

                                      Go one unit from a at an angle of t to c.

                                      Go in unit steps along ca until one is less than a unit away from b to a point p.

                                      If p /= b, then draw a triangle with base pb and sides of unit length adding the sides as the final steps.



                                      As for each t in [0,2$pi$), I've constructed a different accepted zigzaging from a to b, there are uncountably many ways of so staggering from a to b.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$
















                                        2












                                        2








                                        2





                                        $begingroup$

                                        Go one unit from a at an angle of t to c.

                                        Go in unit steps along ca until one is less than a unit away from b to a point p.

                                        If p /= b, then draw a triangle with base pb and sides of unit length adding the sides as the final steps.



                                        As for each t in [0,2$pi$), I've constructed a different accepted zigzaging from a to b, there are uncountably many ways of so staggering from a to b.






                                        share|cite|improve this answer









                                        $endgroup$



                                        Go one unit from a at an angle of t to c.

                                        Go in unit steps along ca until one is less than a unit away from b to a point p.

                                        If p /= b, then draw a triangle with base pb and sides of unit length adding the sides as the final steps.



                                        As for each t in [0,2$pi$), I've constructed a different accepted zigzaging from a to b, there are uncountably many ways of so staggering from a to b.







                                        share|cite|improve this answer












                                        share|cite|improve this answer



                                        share|cite|improve this answer










                                        answered 3 hours ago









                                        William ElliotWilliam Elliot

                                        8,4022720




                                        8,4022720























                                            0












                                            $begingroup$

                                            I believe it is uncountable also, and here is my thought process:



                                            For each direction vector $vinBbb R^2=T_aBbb R^2$, take a curve $alpha_v$ from $a$ to $b$ with $alpha_v'(0)=v$.



                                            Then if $vneq w$, we have $alpha_vneqalpha_w$.



                                            But clearly there are uncountably many direction vectors in $Bbb R^2=T_aBbb R^2$.






                                            share|cite|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$













                                            • $begingroup$
                                              It seems OP wants movements made of straight line segments all of length $1,$ to go from fixed $A$ to fixed $b$ points. [rather than curves as you use]
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – coffeemath
                                              4 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              I did notice that. But I thought, well, straight lines have derivatives. @coffeemath
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Chris Custer
                                              2 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              Cris-- Then to finish one has to show that after the first initial unit straight line step from $A,$ it is possible to continue such steps and somehow arrive at $B.$
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – coffeemath
                                              2 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              @coffeemath yes. Well there certainly appear to be some details missing. But this seems fairly reasonable. Thanks.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Chris Custer
                                              2 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              William Elliot's answer does this.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – coffeemath
                                              1 hour ago
















                                            0












                                            $begingroup$

                                            I believe it is uncountable also, and here is my thought process:



                                            For each direction vector $vinBbb R^2=T_aBbb R^2$, take a curve $alpha_v$ from $a$ to $b$ with $alpha_v'(0)=v$.



                                            Then if $vneq w$, we have $alpha_vneqalpha_w$.



                                            But clearly there are uncountably many direction vectors in $Bbb R^2=T_aBbb R^2$.






                                            share|cite|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$













                                            • $begingroup$
                                              It seems OP wants movements made of straight line segments all of length $1,$ to go from fixed $A$ to fixed $b$ points. [rather than curves as you use]
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – coffeemath
                                              4 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              I did notice that. But I thought, well, straight lines have derivatives. @coffeemath
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Chris Custer
                                              2 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              Cris-- Then to finish one has to show that after the first initial unit straight line step from $A,$ it is possible to continue such steps and somehow arrive at $B.$
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – coffeemath
                                              2 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              @coffeemath yes. Well there certainly appear to be some details missing. But this seems fairly reasonable. Thanks.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Chris Custer
                                              2 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              William Elliot's answer does this.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – coffeemath
                                              1 hour ago














                                            0












                                            0








                                            0





                                            $begingroup$

                                            I believe it is uncountable also, and here is my thought process:



                                            For each direction vector $vinBbb R^2=T_aBbb R^2$, take a curve $alpha_v$ from $a$ to $b$ with $alpha_v'(0)=v$.



                                            Then if $vneq w$, we have $alpha_vneqalpha_w$.



                                            But clearly there are uncountably many direction vectors in $Bbb R^2=T_aBbb R^2$.






                                            share|cite|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$



                                            I believe it is uncountable also, and here is my thought process:



                                            For each direction vector $vinBbb R^2=T_aBbb R^2$, take a curve $alpha_v$ from $a$ to $b$ with $alpha_v'(0)=v$.



                                            Then if $vneq w$, we have $alpha_vneqalpha_w$.



                                            But clearly there are uncountably many direction vectors in $Bbb R^2=T_aBbb R^2$.







                                            share|cite|improve this answer












                                            share|cite|improve this answer



                                            share|cite|improve this answer










                                            answered 4 hours ago









                                            Chris CusterChris Custer

                                            14.1k3827




                                            14.1k3827












                                            • $begingroup$
                                              It seems OP wants movements made of straight line segments all of length $1,$ to go from fixed $A$ to fixed $b$ points. [rather than curves as you use]
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – coffeemath
                                              4 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              I did notice that. But I thought, well, straight lines have derivatives. @coffeemath
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Chris Custer
                                              2 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              Cris-- Then to finish one has to show that after the first initial unit straight line step from $A,$ it is possible to continue such steps and somehow arrive at $B.$
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – coffeemath
                                              2 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              @coffeemath yes. Well there certainly appear to be some details missing. But this seems fairly reasonable. Thanks.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Chris Custer
                                              2 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              William Elliot's answer does this.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – coffeemath
                                              1 hour ago


















                                            • $begingroup$
                                              It seems OP wants movements made of straight line segments all of length $1,$ to go from fixed $A$ to fixed $b$ points. [rather than curves as you use]
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – coffeemath
                                              4 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              I did notice that. But I thought, well, straight lines have derivatives. @coffeemath
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Chris Custer
                                              2 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              Cris-- Then to finish one has to show that after the first initial unit straight line step from $A,$ it is possible to continue such steps and somehow arrive at $B.$
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – coffeemath
                                              2 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              @coffeemath yes. Well there certainly appear to be some details missing. But this seems fairly reasonable. Thanks.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Chris Custer
                                              2 hours ago










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              William Elliot's answer does this.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – coffeemath
                                              1 hour ago
















                                            $begingroup$
                                            It seems OP wants movements made of straight line segments all of length $1,$ to go from fixed $A$ to fixed $b$ points. [rather than curves as you use]
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – coffeemath
                                            4 hours ago




                                            $begingroup$
                                            It seems OP wants movements made of straight line segments all of length $1,$ to go from fixed $A$ to fixed $b$ points. [rather than curves as you use]
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – coffeemath
                                            4 hours ago












                                            $begingroup$
                                            I did notice that. But I thought, well, straight lines have derivatives. @coffeemath
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Chris Custer
                                            2 hours ago




                                            $begingroup$
                                            I did notice that. But I thought, well, straight lines have derivatives. @coffeemath
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Chris Custer
                                            2 hours ago












                                            $begingroup$
                                            Cris-- Then to finish one has to show that after the first initial unit straight line step from $A,$ it is possible to continue such steps and somehow arrive at $B.$
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – coffeemath
                                            2 hours ago




                                            $begingroup$
                                            Cris-- Then to finish one has to show that after the first initial unit straight line step from $A,$ it is possible to continue such steps and somehow arrive at $B.$
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – coffeemath
                                            2 hours ago












                                            $begingroup$
                                            @coffeemath yes. Well there certainly appear to be some details missing. But this seems fairly reasonable. Thanks.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Chris Custer
                                            2 hours ago




                                            $begingroup$
                                            @coffeemath yes. Well there certainly appear to be some details missing. But this seems fairly reasonable. Thanks.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Chris Custer
                                            2 hours ago












                                            $begingroup$
                                            William Elliot's answer does this.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – coffeemath
                                            1 hour ago




                                            $begingroup$
                                            William Elliot's answer does this.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – coffeemath
                                            1 hour ago











                                            0












                                            $begingroup$

                                            Your proof is correct. We can fill in the details on the first part: For any two distinct points $A$ and $B$ in the plane, we can construct a path consisting of unit distances from $A$ to $B$.



                                            If $A$ is more than one unit away from $B$, start at $A$ and take unit steps toward $B$ until we are less than one unit from $B$. If $B$ is a whole number of steps away, we will land on $B$. If not, we will land on a point $P$ within the unit circle centered at $B$. Since $P$ is less than a distance of $1$ away from $B$, the unit circle centered at $P$ will intersect the unit circle centered at $B$ in two places. Take one step from $P$ to an intersection point and then one step from the intersection point to $B$ to finish the path.






                                            share|cite|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$


















                                              0












                                              $begingroup$

                                              Your proof is correct. We can fill in the details on the first part: For any two distinct points $A$ and $B$ in the plane, we can construct a path consisting of unit distances from $A$ to $B$.



                                              If $A$ is more than one unit away from $B$, start at $A$ and take unit steps toward $B$ until we are less than one unit from $B$. If $B$ is a whole number of steps away, we will land on $B$. If not, we will land on a point $P$ within the unit circle centered at $B$. Since $P$ is less than a distance of $1$ away from $B$, the unit circle centered at $P$ will intersect the unit circle centered at $B$ in two places. Take one step from $P$ to an intersection point and then one step from the intersection point to $B$ to finish the path.






                                              share|cite|improve this answer









                                              $endgroup$
















                                                0












                                                0








                                                0





                                                $begingroup$

                                                Your proof is correct. We can fill in the details on the first part: For any two distinct points $A$ and $B$ in the plane, we can construct a path consisting of unit distances from $A$ to $B$.



                                                If $A$ is more than one unit away from $B$, start at $A$ and take unit steps toward $B$ until we are less than one unit from $B$. If $B$ is a whole number of steps away, we will land on $B$. If not, we will land on a point $P$ within the unit circle centered at $B$. Since $P$ is less than a distance of $1$ away from $B$, the unit circle centered at $P$ will intersect the unit circle centered at $B$ in two places. Take one step from $P$ to an intersection point and then one step from the intersection point to $B$ to finish the path.






                                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                                $endgroup$



                                                Your proof is correct. We can fill in the details on the first part: For any two distinct points $A$ and $B$ in the plane, we can construct a path consisting of unit distances from $A$ to $B$.



                                                If $A$ is more than one unit away from $B$, start at $A$ and take unit steps toward $B$ until we are less than one unit from $B$. If $B$ is a whole number of steps away, we will land on $B$. If not, we will land on a point $P$ within the unit circle centered at $B$. Since $P$ is less than a distance of $1$ away from $B$, the unit circle centered at $P$ will intersect the unit circle centered at $B$ in two places. Take one step from $P$ to an intersection point and then one step from the intersection point to $B$ to finish the path.







                                                share|cite|improve this answer












                                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                                share|cite|improve this answer










                                                answered 3 hours ago









                                                John DoumaJohn Douma

                                                5,56211319




                                                5,56211319























                                                    0












                                                    $begingroup$

                                                    Yes, and here is a very simple and intuitive argument without mirrors ;-)



                                                    Observation:




                                                    • Let C be any point on AB such that 0< |AC| < min( |AB|, 2)

                                                    • We can always travel from A to C in 2 x 1-unit steps. (Construct an appropriate unit side isosceles triangle to a point X on the perpendicular bisector of AC such that |AX| = |XC| = 1).

                                                    • We can then travel from C to B in < |AB| unit steps.

                                                    • So all such paths (whatever value of C we chose) will traverse AXCB in < (|AB| + 2) steps, and all such paths are distinct if their respective C' and C are distinct.


                                                    But as C can be any real number in that range of real numbers, the number of distinct C we could have chosen is uncountable. Each C gives a unique valid path, so the number of paths in uncountable.



                                                    The followup question would be the cardinality involved. There is a chance it might be more than aleph_0 - but that's far beyond my skill to figure out.






                                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                                    $endgroup$


















                                                      0












                                                      $begingroup$

                                                      Yes, and here is a very simple and intuitive argument without mirrors ;-)



                                                      Observation:




                                                      • Let C be any point on AB such that 0< |AC| < min( |AB|, 2)

                                                      • We can always travel from A to C in 2 x 1-unit steps. (Construct an appropriate unit side isosceles triangle to a point X on the perpendicular bisector of AC such that |AX| = |XC| = 1).

                                                      • We can then travel from C to B in < |AB| unit steps.

                                                      • So all such paths (whatever value of C we chose) will traverse AXCB in < (|AB| + 2) steps, and all such paths are distinct if their respective C' and C are distinct.


                                                      But as C can be any real number in that range of real numbers, the number of distinct C we could have chosen is uncountable. Each C gives a unique valid path, so the number of paths in uncountable.



                                                      The followup question would be the cardinality involved. There is a chance it might be more than aleph_0 - but that's far beyond my skill to figure out.






                                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                                      $endgroup$
















                                                        0












                                                        0








                                                        0





                                                        $begingroup$

                                                        Yes, and here is a very simple and intuitive argument without mirrors ;-)



                                                        Observation:




                                                        • Let C be any point on AB such that 0< |AC| < min( |AB|, 2)

                                                        • We can always travel from A to C in 2 x 1-unit steps. (Construct an appropriate unit side isosceles triangle to a point X on the perpendicular bisector of AC such that |AX| = |XC| = 1).

                                                        • We can then travel from C to B in < |AB| unit steps.

                                                        • So all such paths (whatever value of C we chose) will traverse AXCB in < (|AB| + 2) steps, and all such paths are distinct if their respective C' and C are distinct.


                                                        But as C can be any real number in that range of real numbers, the number of distinct C we could have chosen is uncountable. Each C gives a unique valid path, so the number of paths in uncountable.



                                                        The followup question would be the cardinality involved. There is a chance it might be more than aleph_0 - but that's far beyond my skill to figure out.






                                                        share|cite|improve this answer









                                                        $endgroup$



                                                        Yes, and here is a very simple and intuitive argument without mirrors ;-)



                                                        Observation:




                                                        • Let C be any point on AB such that 0< |AC| < min( |AB|, 2)

                                                        • We can always travel from A to C in 2 x 1-unit steps. (Construct an appropriate unit side isosceles triangle to a point X on the perpendicular bisector of AC such that |AX| = |XC| = 1).

                                                        • We can then travel from C to B in < |AB| unit steps.

                                                        • So all such paths (whatever value of C we chose) will traverse AXCB in < (|AB| + 2) steps, and all such paths are distinct if their respective C' and C are distinct.


                                                        But as C can be any real number in that range of real numbers, the number of distinct C we could have chosen is uncountable. Each C gives a unique valid path, so the number of paths in uncountable.



                                                        The followup question would be the cardinality involved. There is a chance it might be more than aleph_0 - but that's far beyond my skill to figure out.







                                                        share|cite|improve this answer












                                                        share|cite|improve this answer



                                                        share|cite|improve this answer










                                                        answered 20 mins ago









                                                        StilezStilez

                                                        42129




                                                        42129






























                                                            draft saved

                                                            draft discarded




















































                                                            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                                            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                            But avoid



                                                            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                            draft saved


                                                            draft discarded














                                                            StackExchange.ready(
                                                            function () {
                                                            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3135697%2fis-the-set-of-paths-between-any-two-points-moving-only-in-units-on-the-plane-cou%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                            }
                                                            );

                                                            Post as a guest















                                                            Required, but never shown





















































                                                            Required, but never shown














                                                            Required, but never shown












                                                            Required, but never shown







                                                            Required, but never shown

































                                                            Required, but never shown














                                                            Required, but never shown












                                                            Required, but never shown







                                                            Required, but never shown







                                                            Popular posts from this blog

                                                            Фонтен-ла-Гаярд Зміст Демографія | Економіка | Посилання |...

                                                            Список ссавців Італії Природоохоронні статуси | Список |...

                                                            Маріан Котлеба Зміст Життєпис | Політичні погляди |...