Why are the books in the Game of Thrones citadel library shelved spine inwards?Game of Thrones Title...
How to approximate rolls for potions of healing using only d6's?
What happens if a wizard reaches level 20 but has no 3rd-level spells that they can use with the Signature Spells feature?
Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?
List of numbers giving a particular sum
Which preposition to use with beauty? Of or with?
Why didn't Eru and/or the Valar intervene when Sauron corrupted Númenor?
Eww, those bytes are gross
The vanishing of sum of coefficients: symmetric polynomials
When the voltage is increased does the speed of electrons increase or does the electron density increase?
How do I add a variable to this curl command?
Why avoid shared user accounts?
Numbers of Exaggeration in Talmud
What does conditioning on a random variable mean?
How to acknowledge an embarrassing job interview, now that I work directly with the interviewer?
Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?
How can I introduce myself to a party without saying that I am a rogue?
Vacuum of space
Why is working on the same position for more than 15 years not a red flag?
How to implement expandbefore, similarly to expandafter?
Avoiding morning and evening handshakes
Rear brake cable temporary fix possible?
Making an empty box next to text
Can a hotel cancel a confirmed reservation?
Do my Windows system binaries contain sensitive information?
Why are the books in the Game of Thrones citadel library shelved spine inwards?
Game of Thrones Title SequenceWhy are knights announced as “Ser” in Game of ThronesHow many seasons of Game of Thrones will there be by the time it finishes?What are the lyrics to the Game of Thrones theme?Why is this episode titled “Book of the Stranger”?What is the purpose of the chains hanging from the shelves at the Citadel?Did HBO change the title of Game of Thrones S07E06?Who are the narrators in Game of Thrones Conquest & Rebellion: An Animated History of the Seven Kingdoms?Why didn't they use the bear attack casualty in Game Of Thrones S07E06?Why there are chains hanging from the book shelves in libraries
How do they know the title of each book in the citadel library in Game of Thrones if the book's back faces the wall?
game-of-thrones
New contributor
|
show 3 more comments
How do they know the title of each book in the citadel library in Game of Thrones if the book's back faces the wall?
game-of-thrones
New contributor
7
I’m seeing a wall of book spines... admittedly without visible titles, but they’re not stored ‘backwards ‘
– Tetsujin
Feb 25 at 21:13
8
I suspect, you can take the book off the otherside of the shelf...
– morbo
Feb 25 at 21:45
17
@Tetsujin I'm seeing a wall of book covers, both front and back, with sunken spaces in between them that presumably show the edges of the books' pages. It's especially visible if you look at the second shelf on the left, and look at the tops of the books.
– BrettFromLA
Feb 26 at 1:59
6
hmmm... I'm now seeing the equivalent of old woman/young girl... candlestick/lovers. Every time I glance at it the spines invert.
– Tetsujin
Feb 26 at 7:29
7
That's the spine of the book facing the back of the shelf, not the cover.
– Nuclear Wang
Feb 26 at 13:42
|
show 3 more comments
How do they know the title of each book in the citadel library in Game of Thrones if the book's back faces the wall?
game-of-thrones
New contributor
How do they know the title of each book in the citadel library in Game of Thrones if the book's back faces the wall?
game-of-thrones
game-of-thrones
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
Napoleon Wilson♦
42.1k41271521
42.1k41271521
New contributor
asked Feb 25 at 20:17
Юра БутЮра Бут
512126
512126
New contributor
New contributor
7
I’m seeing a wall of book spines... admittedly without visible titles, but they’re not stored ‘backwards ‘
– Tetsujin
Feb 25 at 21:13
8
I suspect, you can take the book off the otherside of the shelf...
– morbo
Feb 25 at 21:45
17
@Tetsujin I'm seeing a wall of book covers, both front and back, with sunken spaces in between them that presumably show the edges of the books' pages. It's especially visible if you look at the second shelf on the left, and look at the tops of the books.
– BrettFromLA
Feb 26 at 1:59
6
hmmm... I'm now seeing the equivalent of old woman/young girl... candlestick/lovers. Every time I glance at it the spines invert.
– Tetsujin
Feb 26 at 7:29
7
That's the spine of the book facing the back of the shelf, not the cover.
– Nuclear Wang
Feb 26 at 13:42
|
show 3 more comments
7
I’m seeing a wall of book spines... admittedly without visible titles, but they’re not stored ‘backwards ‘
– Tetsujin
Feb 25 at 21:13
8
I suspect, you can take the book off the otherside of the shelf...
– morbo
Feb 25 at 21:45
17
@Tetsujin I'm seeing a wall of book covers, both front and back, with sunken spaces in between them that presumably show the edges of the books' pages. It's especially visible if you look at the second shelf on the left, and look at the tops of the books.
– BrettFromLA
Feb 26 at 1:59
6
hmmm... I'm now seeing the equivalent of old woman/young girl... candlestick/lovers. Every time I glance at it the spines invert.
– Tetsujin
Feb 26 at 7:29
7
That's the spine of the book facing the back of the shelf, not the cover.
– Nuclear Wang
Feb 26 at 13:42
7
7
I’m seeing a wall of book spines... admittedly without visible titles, but they’re not stored ‘backwards ‘
– Tetsujin
Feb 25 at 21:13
I’m seeing a wall of book spines... admittedly without visible titles, but they’re not stored ‘backwards ‘
– Tetsujin
Feb 25 at 21:13
8
8
I suspect, you can take the book off the otherside of the shelf...
– morbo
Feb 25 at 21:45
I suspect, you can take the book off the otherside of the shelf...
– morbo
Feb 25 at 21:45
17
17
@Tetsujin I'm seeing a wall of book covers, both front and back, with sunken spaces in between them that presumably show the edges of the books' pages. It's especially visible if you look at the second shelf on the left, and look at the tops of the books.
– BrettFromLA
Feb 26 at 1:59
@Tetsujin I'm seeing a wall of book covers, both front and back, with sunken spaces in between them that presumably show the edges of the books' pages. It's especially visible if you look at the second shelf on the left, and look at the tops of the books.
– BrettFromLA
Feb 26 at 1:59
6
6
hmmm... I'm now seeing the equivalent of old woman/young girl... candlestick/lovers. Every time I glance at it the spines invert.
– Tetsujin
Feb 26 at 7:29
hmmm... I'm now seeing the equivalent of old woman/young girl... candlestick/lovers. Every time I glance at it the spines invert.
– Tetsujin
Feb 26 at 7:29
7
7
That's the spine of the book facing the back of the shelf, not the cover.
– Nuclear Wang
Feb 26 at 13:42
That's the spine of the book facing the back of the shelf, not the cover.
– Nuclear Wang
Feb 26 at 13:42
|
show 3 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Having books with the spine facing out is a relatively recent innovation.
For the record, when you tuck a book away with the title-bearing spine pointing out, you’re carrying on a tradition that began roughly 480 years ago. “The first spine with printing dates from 1535, and it was then that books began to spin into the position we’re familiar with,” says Mari.
But before book, there were scrolls, and that’s where Mari’s story starts.
- Libraries Used to Chain Their Books to Shelves, With the Spines Hidden Away
- Smithsonian
Since Game of thrones is a fantasy and seems to be (comparatively) set in what would have been something close to Earth's "Middle Ages" with knights and kings all warring constantly this seems to be a pretty accurate depiction of a library.
As scrolls gave way to books, new shelves and a new organizational system were in order.
For the next fourteen hundred or so years, books, as Henry Petroski, a professor of civic engineering and history at Duke, writes in The Book on the Bookshelf, were shelved every which way but straight up, spine out. Engravings of private studies show books piled horizontally, standing on the edge opposite their spine (their fore edge), as well as turned fore edge out.
Before the printing press books were ornate constructions, and in comparison to what came after they were both highly valuable and in short supply.
In the Middle Ages, when monasteries were the closest equivalent to a public library, monks kept works in their carrels. To increase circulation, these works were eventually chained to inclined desks, or lecterns, thus giving ownership of a work to a particular lectern rather than a particular monk.
When space got tight the monks moved their books to shelves, but they stacked them with the spines hidden. Which, as you can imagine, would have been quite confusing. The solution, Mari says: “Sometimes an identifying design was drawn across the thick of the pages.”
- Libraries Used to Chain Their Books to Shelves, With the Spines Hidden Away
- Smithsonian
So, to answer your question about how they were identified: there were sometimes identifying markings on "The thick of the pages".
7
Also noteworthy is that since they're chained to the shelf, they cannot easily be reshelved in the wrong order because the chain tells you where it goes, so you can tell which is which based solely on its location.
– Darrel Hoffman
Feb 26 at 14:08
2
see also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chained_library
– Niffler
Feb 26 at 22:05
2
For anybody else with bad eyesight, that sentence says "these works were eventually chained to inclined desks", not "these monks..."
– Bilkokuya
2 days ago
add a comment |
Originally the shelf marks and titling of a book was written on its fore-edge, the paper part of the book, not on the back (the spine) the way they are today.
The GOT library is modelled after the chained library of Hereford Cathedral. In that library the books have only shelf marks and they are written on the fore-edge, so the fore-edge is the part of the book facing outwards.
Image shared by Hereford Cathedral's official Twitter account to mark
Book Week 2018
The chaining of books was the most widespread and effective security system in European libraries from the Middle Ages to the 18th century, and Hereford Cathedral’s 17th-century Chained Library is the largest to survive with all its chains, rods and locks intact.
A chain is attached at one end to the front cover of each book; the other end is slotted on to a rod running along the bottom of each shelf. The system allows a book to be taken from the shelf and read at the desk, but not to be removed from the bookcase.
The books are shelved with their foredges, rather than their spines, facing the reader (the wrong way round to us); this allows the book to be lifted down and opened without needing to be turned around – thus avoiding tangling the chain.
Quote from the official Hereford Cathedral's page on the Chained Library
6
"The GOT library is modelled after the chained library of Hereford Cathedral." Whilst this seems likely, do you have any evidence to back up such a bold claim?
– TheLethalCarrot
Feb 27 at 14:57
In King Matthias of Hungary's Corvina Library, the book title was most often written on the back cover, but could also appear on the gilded and decorated fore-edge: corvina.hu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/…
– Martha
2 days ago
add a comment |
Our eyes are playing tricks on us. We look at these shelves with all the books and our mind is telling us that the books are turned around, when in fact they are representing books the way they were bound in that era.
Book binding has evolved over the years. Modern books have covers that wrap from the front and around one side to the back with pages sewn or glued to the side spine. But years ago, there was no spine. Pages were often tied together with heavy wood or (other material) for front and back covers. (see image below)
When we see the books on the shelves of the Citadel, we "see" them as turned around because that is how we are accustomed to seeing our modern day books (i.e.; no spine = other side of the book). What we are really seeing is a more accurate depiction of a library in that age and time, with no spines at all. Yes, Sam is holding books with a spine. Some books in the library will be older than others. Hence, different binding processes.
Wikipedia Bookbinding
4
But we do see spines on non-chained books, for example timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/… and imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/fan/… - and there are no bindings like in your photo at the front facing side of the chained books on the shelves
– user568458
Feb 28 at 11:31
Perhaps some of the books are being portrayed as "older" than others. This is, after all, a wall of movie props and not the genuine books from the "real" Westeros.
– elbrant
2 days ago
2
Comparing your image with the one in the question just proves that the books are indeed shelve with the spine hidden, so it's not a visual illusion. Check the other answers.
– Luciano
2 days ago
If I were to DV it would be for the reason that you don't attempt to answer the question at all, but just try to find books with no spines at all, so as to get out of the question and into your own rabbithole
– Niffler
2 days ago
2
The definitely had them spine inwards for the series. You can see it when the Archmaester pulls out a book here
– Obsidian Phoenix
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Having books with the spine facing out is a relatively recent innovation.
For the record, when you tuck a book away with the title-bearing spine pointing out, you’re carrying on a tradition that began roughly 480 years ago. “The first spine with printing dates from 1535, and it was then that books began to spin into the position we’re familiar with,” says Mari.
But before book, there were scrolls, and that’s where Mari’s story starts.
- Libraries Used to Chain Their Books to Shelves, With the Spines Hidden Away
- Smithsonian
Since Game of thrones is a fantasy and seems to be (comparatively) set in what would have been something close to Earth's "Middle Ages" with knights and kings all warring constantly this seems to be a pretty accurate depiction of a library.
As scrolls gave way to books, new shelves and a new organizational system were in order.
For the next fourteen hundred or so years, books, as Henry Petroski, a professor of civic engineering and history at Duke, writes in The Book on the Bookshelf, were shelved every which way but straight up, spine out. Engravings of private studies show books piled horizontally, standing on the edge opposite their spine (their fore edge), as well as turned fore edge out.
Before the printing press books were ornate constructions, and in comparison to what came after they were both highly valuable and in short supply.
In the Middle Ages, when monasteries were the closest equivalent to a public library, monks kept works in their carrels. To increase circulation, these works were eventually chained to inclined desks, or lecterns, thus giving ownership of a work to a particular lectern rather than a particular monk.
When space got tight the monks moved their books to shelves, but they stacked them with the spines hidden. Which, as you can imagine, would have been quite confusing. The solution, Mari says: “Sometimes an identifying design was drawn across the thick of the pages.”
- Libraries Used to Chain Their Books to Shelves, With the Spines Hidden Away
- Smithsonian
So, to answer your question about how they were identified: there were sometimes identifying markings on "The thick of the pages".
7
Also noteworthy is that since they're chained to the shelf, they cannot easily be reshelved in the wrong order because the chain tells you where it goes, so you can tell which is which based solely on its location.
– Darrel Hoffman
Feb 26 at 14:08
2
see also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chained_library
– Niffler
Feb 26 at 22:05
2
For anybody else with bad eyesight, that sentence says "these works were eventually chained to inclined desks", not "these monks..."
– Bilkokuya
2 days ago
add a comment |
Having books with the spine facing out is a relatively recent innovation.
For the record, when you tuck a book away with the title-bearing spine pointing out, you’re carrying on a tradition that began roughly 480 years ago. “The first spine with printing dates from 1535, and it was then that books began to spin into the position we’re familiar with,” says Mari.
But before book, there were scrolls, and that’s where Mari’s story starts.
- Libraries Used to Chain Their Books to Shelves, With the Spines Hidden Away
- Smithsonian
Since Game of thrones is a fantasy and seems to be (comparatively) set in what would have been something close to Earth's "Middle Ages" with knights and kings all warring constantly this seems to be a pretty accurate depiction of a library.
As scrolls gave way to books, new shelves and a new organizational system were in order.
For the next fourteen hundred or so years, books, as Henry Petroski, a professor of civic engineering and history at Duke, writes in The Book on the Bookshelf, were shelved every which way but straight up, spine out. Engravings of private studies show books piled horizontally, standing on the edge opposite their spine (their fore edge), as well as turned fore edge out.
Before the printing press books were ornate constructions, and in comparison to what came after they were both highly valuable and in short supply.
In the Middle Ages, when monasteries were the closest equivalent to a public library, monks kept works in their carrels. To increase circulation, these works were eventually chained to inclined desks, or lecterns, thus giving ownership of a work to a particular lectern rather than a particular monk.
When space got tight the monks moved their books to shelves, but they stacked them with the spines hidden. Which, as you can imagine, would have been quite confusing. The solution, Mari says: “Sometimes an identifying design was drawn across the thick of the pages.”
- Libraries Used to Chain Their Books to Shelves, With the Spines Hidden Away
- Smithsonian
So, to answer your question about how they were identified: there were sometimes identifying markings on "The thick of the pages".
7
Also noteworthy is that since they're chained to the shelf, they cannot easily be reshelved in the wrong order because the chain tells you where it goes, so you can tell which is which based solely on its location.
– Darrel Hoffman
Feb 26 at 14:08
2
see also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chained_library
– Niffler
Feb 26 at 22:05
2
For anybody else with bad eyesight, that sentence says "these works were eventually chained to inclined desks", not "these monks..."
– Bilkokuya
2 days ago
add a comment |
Having books with the spine facing out is a relatively recent innovation.
For the record, when you tuck a book away with the title-bearing spine pointing out, you’re carrying on a tradition that began roughly 480 years ago. “The first spine with printing dates from 1535, and it was then that books began to spin into the position we’re familiar with,” says Mari.
But before book, there were scrolls, and that’s where Mari’s story starts.
- Libraries Used to Chain Their Books to Shelves, With the Spines Hidden Away
- Smithsonian
Since Game of thrones is a fantasy and seems to be (comparatively) set in what would have been something close to Earth's "Middle Ages" with knights and kings all warring constantly this seems to be a pretty accurate depiction of a library.
As scrolls gave way to books, new shelves and a new organizational system were in order.
For the next fourteen hundred or so years, books, as Henry Petroski, a professor of civic engineering and history at Duke, writes in The Book on the Bookshelf, were shelved every which way but straight up, spine out. Engravings of private studies show books piled horizontally, standing on the edge opposite their spine (their fore edge), as well as turned fore edge out.
Before the printing press books were ornate constructions, and in comparison to what came after they were both highly valuable and in short supply.
In the Middle Ages, when monasteries were the closest equivalent to a public library, monks kept works in their carrels. To increase circulation, these works were eventually chained to inclined desks, or lecterns, thus giving ownership of a work to a particular lectern rather than a particular monk.
When space got tight the monks moved their books to shelves, but they stacked them with the spines hidden. Which, as you can imagine, would have been quite confusing. The solution, Mari says: “Sometimes an identifying design was drawn across the thick of the pages.”
- Libraries Used to Chain Their Books to Shelves, With the Spines Hidden Away
- Smithsonian
So, to answer your question about how they were identified: there were sometimes identifying markings on "The thick of the pages".
Having books with the spine facing out is a relatively recent innovation.
For the record, when you tuck a book away with the title-bearing spine pointing out, you’re carrying on a tradition that began roughly 480 years ago. “The first spine with printing dates from 1535, and it was then that books began to spin into the position we’re familiar with,” says Mari.
But before book, there were scrolls, and that’s where Mari’s story starts.
- Libraries Used to Chain Their Books to Shelves, With the Spines Hidden Away
- Smithsonian
Since Game of thrones is a fantasy and seems to be (comparatively) set in what would have been something close to Earth's "Middle Ages" with knights and kings all warring constantly this seems to be a pretty accurate depiction of a library.
As scrolls gave way to books, new shelves and a new organizational system were in order.
For the next fourteen hundred or so years, books, as Henry Petroski, a professor of civic engineering and history at Duke, writes in The Book on the Bookshelf, were shelved every which way but straight up, spine out. Engravings of private studies show books piled horizontally, standing on the edge opposite their spine (their fore edge), as well as turned fore edge out.
Before the printing press books were ornate constructions, and in comparison to what came after they were both highly valuable and in short supply.
In the Middle Ages, when monasteries were the closest equivalent to a public library, monks kept works in their carrels. To increase circulation, these works were eventually chained to inclined desks, or lecterns, thus giving ownership of a work to a particular lectern rather than a particular monk.
When space got tight the monks moved their books to shelves, but they stacked them with the spines hidden. Which, as you can imagine, would have been quite confusing. The solution, Mari says: “Sometimes an identifying design was drawn across the thick of the pages.”
- Libraries Used to Chain Their Books to Shelves, With the Spines Hidden Away
- Smithsonian
So, to answer your question about how they were identified: there were sometimes identifying markings on "The thick of the pages".
answered Feb 25 at 22:41
NifflerNiffler
2,2051223
2,2051223
7
Also noteworthy is that since they're chained to the shelf, they cannot easily be reshelved in the wrong order because the chain tells you where it goes, so you can tell which is which based solely on its location.
– Darrel Hoffman
Feb 26 at 14:08
2
see also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chained_library
– Niffler
Feb 26 at 22:05
2
For anybody else with bad eyesight, that sentence says "these works were eventually chained to inclined desks", not "these monks..."
– Bilkokuya
2 days ago
add a comment |
7
Also noteworthy is that since they're chained to the shelf, they cannot easily be reshelved in the wrong order because the chain tells you where it goes, so you can tell which is which based solely on its location.
– Darrel Hoffman
Feb 26 at 14:08
2
see also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chained_library
– Niffler
Feb 26 at 22:05
2
For anybody else with bad eyesight, that sentence says "these works were eventually chained to inclined desks", not "these monks..."
– Bilkokuya
2 days ago
7
7
Also noteworthy is that since they're chained to the shelf, they cannot easily be reshelved in the wrong order because the chain tells you where it goes, so you can tell which is which based solely on its location.
– Darrel Hoffman
Feb 26 at 14:08
Also noteworthy is that since they're chained to the shelf, they cannot easily be reshelved in the wrong order because the chain tells you where it goes, so you can tell which is which based solely on its location.
– Darrel Hoffman
Feb 26 at 14:08
2
2
see also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chained_library
– Niffler
Feb 26 at 22:05
see also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chained_library
– Niffler
Feb 26 at 22:05
2
2
For anybody else with bad eyesight, that sentence says "these works were eventually chained to inclined desks", not "these monks..."
– Bilkokuya
2 days ago
For anybody else with bad eyesight, that sentence says "these works were eventually chained to inclined desks", not "these monks..."
– Bilkokuya
2 days ago
add a comment |
Originally the shelf marks and titling of a book was written on its fore-edge, the paper part of the book, not on the back (the spine) the way they are today.
The GOT library is modelled after the chained library of Hereford Cathedral. In that library the books have only shelf marks and they are written on the fore-edge, so the fore-edge is the part of the book facing outwards.
Image shared by Hereford Cathedral's official Twitter account to mark
Book Week 2018
The chaining of books was the most widespread and effective security system in European libraries from the Middle Ages to the 18th century, and Hereford Cathedral’s 17th-century Chained Library is the largest to survive with all its chains, rods and locks intact.
A chain is attached at one end to the front cover of each book; the other end is slotted on to a rod running along the bottom of each shelf. The system allows a book to be taken from the shelf and read at the desk, but not to be removed from the bookcase.
The books are shelved with their foredges, rather than their spines, facing the reader (the wrong way round to us); this allows the book to be lifted down and opened without needing to be turned around – thus avoiding tangling the chain.
Quote from the official Hereford Cathedral's page on the Chained Library
6
"The GOT library is modelled after the chained library of Hereford Cathedral." Whilst this seems likely, do you have any evidence to back up such a bold claim?
– TheLethalCarrot
Feb 27 at 14:57
In King Matthias of Hungary's Corvina Library, the book title was most often written on the back cover, but could also appear on the gilded and decorated fore-edge: corvina.hu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/…
– Martha
2 days ago
add a comment |
Originally the shelf marks and titling of a book was written on its fore-edge, the paper part of the book, not on the back (the spine) the way they are today.
The GOT library is modelled after the chained library of Hereford Cathedral. In that library the books have only shelf marks and they are written on the fore-edge, so the fore-edge is the part of the book facing outwards.
Image shared by Hereford Cathedral's official Twitter account to mark
Book Week 2018
The chaining of books was the most widespread and effective security system in European libraries from the Middle Ages to the 18th century, and Hereford Cathedral’s 17th-century Chained Library is the largest to survive with all its chains, rods and locks intact.
A chain is attached at one end to the front cover of each book; the other end is slotted on to a rod running along the bottom of each shelf. The system allows a book to be taken from the shelf and read at the desk, but not to be removed from the bookcase.
The books are shelved with their foredges, rather than their spines, facing the reader (the wrong way round to us); this allows the book to be lifted down and opened without needing to be turned around – thus avoiding tangling the chain.
Quote from the official Hereford Cathedral's page on the Chained Library
6
"The GOT library is modelled after the chained library of Hereford Cathedral." Whilst this seems likely, do you have any evidence to back up such a bold claim?
– TheLethalCarrot
Feb 27 at 14:57
In King Matthias of Hungary's Corvina Library, the book title was most often written on the back cover, but could also appear on the gilded and decorated fore-edge: corvina.hu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/…
– Martha
2 days ago
add a comment |
Originally the shelf marks and titling of a book was written on its fore-edge, the paper part of the book, not on the back (the spine) the way they are today.
The GOT library is modelled after the chained library of Hereford Cathedral. In that library the books have only shelf marks and they are written on the fore-edge, so the fore-edge is the part of the book facing outwards.
Image shared by Hereford Cathedral's official Twitter account to mark
Book Week 2018
The chaining of books was the most widespread and effective security system in European libraries from the Middle Ages to the 18th century, and Hereford Cathedral’s 17th-century Chained Library is the largest to survive with all its chains, rods and locks intact.
A chain is attached at one end to the front cover of each book; the other end is slotted on to a rod running along the bottom of each shelf. The system allows a book to be taken from the shelf and read at the desk, but not to be removed from the bookcase.
The books are shelved with their foredges, rather than their spines, facing the reader (the wrong way round to us); this allows the book to be lifted down and opened without needing to be turned around – thus avoiding tangling the chain.
Quote from the official Hereford Cathedral's page on the Chained Library
Originally the shelf marks and titling of a book was written on its fore-edge, the paper part of the book, not on the back (the spine) the way they are today.
The GOT library is modelled after the chained library of Hereford Cathedral. In that library the books have only shelf marks and they are written on the fore-edge, so the fore-edge is the part of the book facing outwards.
Image shared by Hereford Cathedral's official Twitter account to mark
Book Week 2018
The chaining of books was the most widespread and effective security system in European libraries from the Middle Ages to the 18th century, and Hereford Cathedral’s 17th-century Chained Library is the largest to survive with all its chains, rods and locks intact.
A chain is attached at one end to the front cover of each book; the other end is slotted on to a rod running along the bottom of each shelf. The system allows a book to be taken from the shelf and read at the desk, but not to be removed from the bookcase.
The books are shelved with their foredges, rather than their spines, facing the reader (the wrong way round to us); this allows the book to be lifted down and opened without needing to be turned around – thus avoiding tangling the chain.
Quote from the official Hereford Cathedral's page on the Chained Library
edited Feb 26 at 15:02
user568458
8,2203059
8,2203059
answered Feb 26 at 1:54
Tyler DurdenTyler Durden
4,98152455
4,98152455
6
"The GOT library is modelled after the chained library of Hereford Cathedral." Whilst this seems likely, do you have any evidence to back up such a bold claim?
– TheLethalCarrot
Feb 27 at 14:57
In King Matthias of Hungary's Corvina Library, the book title was most often written on the back cover, but could also appear on the gilded and decorated fore-edge: corvina.hu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/…
– Martha
2 days ago
add a comment |
6
"The GOT library is modelled after the chained library of Hereford Cathedral." Whilst this seems likely, do you have any evidence to back up such a bold claim?
– TheLethalCarrot
Feb 27 at 14:57
In King Matthias of Hungary's Corvina Library, the book title was most often written on the back cover, but could also appear on the gilded and decorated fore-edge: corvina.hu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/…
– Martha
2 days ago
6
6
"The GOT library is modelled after the chained library of Hereford Cathedral." Whilst this seems likely, do you have any evidence to back up such a bold claim?
– TheLethalCarrot
Feb 27 at 14:57
"The GOT library is modelled after the chained library of Hereford Cathedral." Whilst this seems likely, do you have any evidence to back up such a bold claim?
– TheLethalCarrot
Feb 27 at 14:57
In King Matthias of Hungary's Corvina Library, the book title was most often written on the back cover, but could also appear on the gilded and decorated fore-edge: corvina.hu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/…
– Martha
2 days ago
In King Matthias of Hungary's Corvina Library, the book title was most often written on the back cover, but could also appear on the gilded and decorated fore-edge: corvina.hu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/…
– Martha
2 days ago
add a comment |
Our eyes are playing tricks on us. We look at these shelves with all the books and our mind is telling us that the books are turned around, when in fact they are representing books the way they were bound in that era.
Book binding has evolved over the years. Modern books have covers that wrap from the front and around one side to the back with pages sewn or glued to the side spine. But years ago, there was no spine. Pages were often tied together with heavy wood or (other material) for front and back covers. (see image below)
When we see the books on the shelves of the Citadel, we "see" them as turned around because that is how we are accustomed to seeing our modern day books (i.e.; no spine = other side of the book). What we are really seeing is a more accurate depiction of a library in that age and time, with no spines at all. Yes, Sam is holding books with a spine. Some books in the library will be older than others. Hence, different binding processes.
Wikipedia Bookbinding
4
But we do see spines on non-chained books, for example timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/… and imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/fan/… - and there are no bindings like in your photo at the front facing side of the chained books on the shelves
– user568458
Feb 28 at 11:31
Perhaps some of the books are being portrayed as "older" than others. This is, after all, a wall of movie props and not the genuine books from the "real" Westeros.
– elbrant
2 days ago
2
Comparing your image with the one in the question just proves that the books are indeed shelve with the spine hidden, so it's not a visual illusion. Check the other answers.
– Luciano
2 days ago
If I were to DV it would be for the reason that you don't attempt to answer the question at all, but just try to find books with no spines at all, so as to get out of the question and into your own rabbithole
– Niffler
2 days ago
2
The definitely had them spine inwards for the series. You can see it when the Archmaester pulls out a book here
– Obsidian Phoenix
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
Our eyes are playing tricks on us. We look at these shelves with all the books and our mind is telling us that the books are turned around, when in fact they are representing books the way they were bound in that era.
Book binding has evolved over the years. Modern books have covers that wrap from the front and around one side to the back with pages sewn or glued to the side spine. But years ago, there was no spine. Pages were often tied together with heavy wood or (other material) for front and back covers. (see image below)
When we see the books on the shelves of the Citadel, we "see" them as turned around because that is how we are accustomed to seeing our modern day books (i.e.; no spine = other side of the book). What we are really seeing is a more accurate depiction of a library in that age and time, with no spines at all. Yes, Sam is holding books with a spine. Some books in the library will be older than others. Hence, different binding processes.
Wikipedia Bookbinding
4
But we do see spines on non-chained books, for example timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/… and imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/fan/… - and there are no bindings like in your photo at the front facing side of the chained books on the shelves
– user568458
Feb 28 at 11:31
Perhaps some of the books are being portrayed as "older" than others. This is, after all, a wall of movie props and not the genuine books from the "real" Westeros.
– elbrant
2 days ago
2
Comparing your image with the one in the question just proves that the books are indeed shelve with the spine hidden, so it's not a visual illusion. Check the other answers.
– Luciano
2 days ago
If I were to DV it would be for the reason that you don't attempt to answer the question at all, but just try to find books with no spines at all, so as to get out of the question and into your own rabbithole
– Niffler
2 days ago
2
The definitely had them spine inwards for the series. You can see it when the Archmaester pulls out a book here
– Obsidian Phoenix
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
Our eyes are playing tricks on us. We look at these shelves with all the books and our mind is telling us that the books are turned around, when in fact they are representing books the way they were bound in that era.
Book binding has evolved over the years. Modern books have covers that wrap from the front and around one side to the back with pages sewn or glued to the side spine. But years ago, there was no spine. Pages were often tied together with heavy wood or (other material) for front and back covers. (see image below)
When we see the books on the shelves of the Citadel, we "see" them as turned around because that is how we are accustomed to seeing our modern day books (i.e.; no spine = other side of the book). What we are really seeing is a more accurate depiction of a library in that age and time, with no spines at all. Yes, Sam is holding books with a spine. Some books in the library will be older than others. Hence, different binding processes.
Wikipedia Bookbinding
Our eyes are playing tricks on us. We look at these shelves with all the books and our mind is telling us that the books are turned around, when in fact they are representing books the way they were bound in that era.
Book binding has evolved over the years. Modern books have covers that wrap from the front and around one side to the back with pages sewn or glued to the side spine. But years ago, there was no spine. Pages were often tied together with heavy wood or (other material) for front and back covers. (see image below)
When we see the books on the shelves of the Citadel, we "see" them as turned around because that is how we are accustomed to seeing our modern day books (i.e.; no spine = other side of the book). What we are really seeing is a more accurate depiction of a library in that age and time, with no spines at all. Yes, Sam is holding books with a spine. Some books in the library will be older than others. Hence, different binding processes.
Wikipedia Bookbinding
edited 2 days ago
answered Feb 28 at 5:41
elbrantelbrant
431110
431110
4
But we do see spines on non-chained books, for example timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/… and imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/fan/… - and there are no bindings like in your photo at the front facing side of the chained books on the shelves
– user568458
Feb 28 at 11:31
Perhaps some of the books are being portrayed as "older" than others. This is, after all, a wall of movie props and not the genuine books from the "real" Westeros.
– elbrant
2 days ago
2
Comparing your image with the one in the question just proves that the books are indeed shelve with the spine hidden, so it's not a visual illusion. Check the other answers.
– Luciano
2 days ago
If I were to DV it would be for the reason that you don't attempt to answer the question at all, but just try to find books with no spines at all, so as to get out of the question and into your own rabbithole
– Niffler
2 days ago
2
The definitely had them spine inwards for the series. You can see it when the Archmaester pulls out a book here
– Obsidian Phoenix
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
4
But we do see spines on non-chained books, for example timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/… and imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/fan/… - and there are no bindings like in your photo at the front facing side of the chained books on the shelves
– user568458
Feb 28 at 11:31
Perhaps some of the books are being portrayed as "older" than others. This is, after all, a wall of movie props and not the genuine books from the "real" Westeros.
– elbrant
2 days ago
2
Comparing your image with the one in the question just proves that the books are indeed shelve with the spine hidden, so it's not a visual illusion. Check the other answers.
– Luciano
2 days ago
If I were to DV it would be for the reason that you don't attempt to answer the question at all, but just try to find books with no spines at all, so as to get out of the question and into your own rabbithole
– Niffler
2 days ago
2
The definitely had them spine inwards for the series. You can see it when the Archmaester pulls out a book here
– Obsidian Phoenix
yesterday
4
4
But we do see spines on non-chained books, for example timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/… and imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/fan/… - and there are no bindings like in your photo at the front facing side of the chained books on the shelves
– user568458
Feb 28 at 11:31
But we do see spines on non-chained books, for example timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/… and imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/fan/… - and there are no bindings like in your photo at the front facing side of the chained books on the shelves
– user568458
Feb 28 at 11:31
Perhaps some of the books are being portrayed as "older" than others. This is, after all, a wall of movie props and not the genuine books from the "real" Westeros.
– elbrant
2 days ago
Perhaps some of the books are being portrayed as "older" than others. This is, after all, a wall of movie props and not the genuine books from the "real" Westeros.
– elbrant
2 days ago
2
2
Comparing your image with the one in the question just proves that the books are indeed shelve with the spine hidden, so it's not a visual illusion. Check the other answers.
– Luciano
2 days ago
Comparing your image with the one in the question just proves that the books are indeed shelve with the spine hidden, so it's not a visual illusion. Check the other answers.
– Luciano
2 days ago
If I were to DV it would be for the reason that you don't attempt to answer the question at all, but just try to find books with no spines at all, so as to get out of the question and into your own rabbithole
– Niffler
2 days ago
If I were to DV it would be for the reason that you don't attempt to answer the question at all, but just try to find books with no spines at all, so as to get out of the question and into your own rabbithole
– Niffler
2 days ago
2
2
The definitely had them spine inwards for the series. You can see it when the Archmaester pulls out a book here
– Obsidian Phoenix
yesterday
The definitely had them spine inwards for the series. You can see it when the Archmaester pulls out a book here
– Obsidian Phoenix
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
7
I’m seeing a wall of book spines... admittedly without visible titles, but they’re not stored ‘backwards ‘
– Tetsujin
Feb 25 at 21:13
8
I suspect, you can take the book off the otherside of the shelf...
– morbo
Feb 25 at 21:45
17
@Tetsujin I'm seeing a wall of book covers, both front and back, with sunken spaces in between them that presumably show the edges of the books' pages. It's especially visible if you look at the second shelf on the left, and look at the tops of the books.
– BrettFromLA
Feb 26 at 1:59
6
hmmm... I'm now seeing the equivalent of old woman/young girl... candlestick/lovers. Every time I glance at it the spines invert.
– Tetsujin
Feb 26 at 7:29
7
That's the spine of the book facing the back of the shelf, not the cover.
– Nuclear Wang
Feb 26 at 13:42