Server 2008/Windows 7/Samba Unspecified error 80004005Windows/Samba connection errorWindows XP and...
Whom do I have to contact for a ticket refund in case of denied boarding (in the EU)?
Can you use a beast's innate abilities while polymorphed?
Hacker Rank: Array left rotation
How to deny access to SQL Server to certain login over SSMS, but allow over .Net SqlClient Data Provider
When should a commit not be version tagged?
How can I be pwned if I'm not registered on that site?
Replacement ford fiesta radiator has extra hose
Difference between 'stomach' and 'uterus'
Difference between 小吃 and 零食
Should I choose Itemized or Standard deduction?
I am on the US no-fly list. What can I do in order to be allowed on flights which go through US airspace?
Understanding Kramnik's play in game 1 of Candidates 2018
What are these green text/line displays shown during the livestream of Crew Dragon's approach to dock with the ISS?
Magento 2: Override XML file from vendor folder to app folder doesn't work/update
Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?
Easy code troubleshooting in wordpress
Infrastructure damage from sudden thickening of water
Is the set of paths between any two points moving only in units on the plane countable or uncountable?
Six real numbers so that product of any five is the sixth one
Accessing something inside the object when you don't know the key
Has the Isbell–Freyd criterion ever been used to check that a category is concretisable?
How to count occurrences of Friday 13th
What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?
Second-rate spelling
Server 2008/Windows 7/Samba Unspecified error 80004005
Windows/Samba connection errorWindows XP and SAMBAWindows clients unable to access Samba share on AD joined Linux box every 7 daysSamba server not visible from Win networkWindows 7 Samba issueSamba Ignoring POSIX ACLsSamba4 [homes] shareWindows 7 extremely slow with samba 4Auth fail on Samba server with LDAP backendSet up Samba with Active Directory and local user authentication
I have a Samba share on a LAN with 2008 PDC/DNS. Smb authenticates with AD and I have several Win7 Machines that can connect fine.
I recently added a couple of new computers to the LAN which were imaged the same way (same software, etc.; different hardware so different drivers) as the other machines and they have the same policies set.
I can not get the new machines to connect to the samba share no matter what. I am always met with either Unspecified Error 0x80004005
or Network Path not found
.
I've turned off the firewall; set LANMAN auth to respond to NTLM only/send LM & NTLM responses/use NTLM session security if negotiated in Local Sec Policy > SEcurity Options; tried both ip and hostname to connect.
SMB log shows that authentication succeeds; but then connection is immediately killed by the client.
tcpdump shows nothing remarkable except that when trying to connect from the client via hostname there is an unknown packet type error:
ack 201 win 255 NBT Session Packet: Unknown packet type 0xABData: (41 bytes)
Here's a couple of lines from that error:
11:18:37.964991 IP 001-client.domain.local.49372 > smb.domain.local.netbios-ssn: P 1670:2146(476) ack 201 win 255 NBT Session Packet: Unknown packet type 0xABData: (41 bytes)
[000] AA 46 96 FA D5 99 33 75 0C C4 20 CE 26 42 F3 61 252F2263723252313u 14304 316&B363a
[010] F0 8C FB 65 18 17 40 A5 DB 42 BB 94 37 53 92 EC 360214373e3027@245 333B2732247S222354
[020] 55 98 7F C4 AE 3D 6B 10 C4 U230177304256=k20 304
11:18:37.964998 IP smb.domain.local.netbios-ssn > 001-client.domain.local.49372: . ack 2146 win 100
[edit for strike: this turned out to be an issue with arp cache and the client being issued an old ip from dhcp that previously belonged to another machine]
I'm also getting this error consistently:
[2012/09/10 11:50:00.529650, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:1413(setup_new_vc_session)
setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources.
Here's smb.conf just in case (though don't see how if other machines are working fine):
[global]
workgroup = MYDOMAIN
realm = MYDOMAIN.LOCAL
server string = domain|smb share
interfaces = eth1
security = ADS
password server = 192.168.1.3
log level = 2
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
smb ports = 139
strict locking = no
load printers = No
local master = No
domain master = No
wins server = 192.168.1.3
wins support = Yes
idmap uid = 500-10000000
idmap gid = 500-10000000
winbind separator = +
winbind enum users = Yes
winbind enum groups = Yes
winbind use default domain = Yes
[samba-share1]
comment = SMB Share
path = /home/share/smb/
valid users = @"MYDOMAIN+Domain Users"
admin users = @"MYDOMAIN+Domain Admins"
guest ok = no
read only = No
create mask = 0765
force directory mode = 0777
Any ideas what else I could try or look for? Or what might be the problem?
Thanks.
Update 1
Noticed on the other machines that Local Security Policy > LAN Manager authentication level was Not Defined. There is no way to set it as such through the LSP editor, so had to go into regedit and delete HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlLsalmcompatibilitylevel
However, this didn't solve the issue. Am now met with Accessing the resource '\smbshare' has been disallowed
. or Unspecified Error
depending on who I'm logged in as (regular user == former; admin == latter)
Update 2
It's incredibly frustrating when you ask a question on SF and in the interim keep searching for answers only to find a couple of hours later your own question is repeatedly the first google result ;)
Update 3
I ran Wireshark on the client, and so far as I can tell everything on the Samba end is working correctly. I see in a Negotiate Protocol Request an NT Status of STATUS_SUCCESS (which may very well be the authentication success, but don't know).
Everything is pointing to an issue on the Client itself. On other machines, everything works as expected. Including a VM running on my box. It works using both admin and regular user credentials.
NB the client I'm trying to get this working on has Firewall off and no a/v etc for the time being while trying to work this out.
I've updated the NIC driver and there is only 1 iface available. DNS is working and I've matched up all the settings I can find to the working VM and other working machines.
Getting desperate so any ideas would be awesome.
windows-server-2008 windows-7 samba
add a comment |
I have a Samba share on a LAN with 2008 PDC/DNS. Smb authenticates with AD and I have several Win7 Machines that can connect fine.
I recently added a couple of new computers to the LAN which were imaged the same way (same software, etc.; different hardware so different drivers) as the other machines and they have the same policies set.
I can not get the new machines to connect to the samba share no matter what. I am always met with either Unspecified Error 0x80004005
or Network Path not found
.
I've turned off the firewall; set LANMAN auth to respond to NTLM only/send LM & NTLM responses/use NTLM session security if negotiated in Local Sec Policy > SEcurity Options; tried both ip and hostname to connect.
SMB log shows that authentication succeeds; but then connection is immediately killed by the client.
tcpdump shows nothing remarkable except that when trying to connect from the client via hostname there is an unknown packet type error:
ack 201 win 255 NBT Session Packet: Unknown packet type 0xABData: (41 bytes)
Here's a couple of lines from that error:
11:18:37.964991 IP 001-client.domain.local.49372 > smb.domain.local.netbios-ssn: P 1670:2146(476) ack 201 win 255 NBT Session Packet: Unknown packet type 0xABData: (41 bytes)
[000] AA 46 96 FA D5 99 33 75 0C C4 20 CE 26 42 F3 61 252F2263723252313u 14304 316&B363a
[010] F0 8C FB 65 18 17 40 A5 DB 42 BB 94 37 53 92 EC 360214373e3027@245 333B2732247S222354
[020] 55 98 7F C4 AE 3D 6B 10 C4 U230177304256=k20 304
11:18:37.964998 IP smb.domain.local.netbios-ssn > 001-client.domain.local.49372: . ack 2146 win 100
[edit for strike: this turned out to be an issue with arp cache and the client being issued an old ip from dhcp that previously belonged to another machine]
I'm also getting this error consistently:
[2012/09/10 11:50:00.529650, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:1413(setup_new_vc_session)
setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources.
Here's smb.conf just in case (though don't see how if other machines are working fine):
[global]
workgroup = MYDOMAIN
realm = MYDOMAIN.LOCAL
server string = domain|smb share
interfaces = eth1
security = ADS
password server = 192.168.1.3
log level = 2
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
smb ports = 139
strict locking = no
load printers = No
local master = No
domain master = No
wins server = 192.168.1.3
wins support = Yes
idmap uid = 500-10000000
idmap gid = 500-10000000
winbind separator = +
winbind enum users = Yes
winbind enum groups = Yes
winbind use default domain = Yes
[samba-share1]
comment = SMB Share
path = /home/share/smb/
valid users = @"MYDOMAIN+Domain Users"
admin users = @"MYDOMAIN+Domain Admins"
guest ok = no
read only = No
create mask = 0765
force directory mode = 0777
Any ideas what else I could try or look for? Or what might be the problem?
Thanks.
Update 1
Noticed on the other machines that Local Security Policy > LAN Manager authentication level was Not Defined. There is no way to set it as such through the LSP editor, so had to go into regedit and delete HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlLsalmcompatibilitylevel
However, this didn't solve the issue. Am now met with Accessing the resource '\smbshare' has been disallowed
. or Unspecified Error
depending on who I'm logged in as (regular user == former; admin == latter)
Update 2
It's incredibly frustrating when you ask a question on SF and in the interim keep searching for answers only to find a couple of hours later your own question is repeatedly the first google result ;)
Update 3
I ran Wireshark on the client, and so far as I can tell everything on the Samba end is working correctly. I see in a Negotiate Protocol Request an NT Status of STATUS_SUCCESS (which may very well be the authentication success, but don't know).
Everything is pointing to an issue on the Client itself. On other machines, everything works as expected. Including a VM running on my box. It works using both admin and regular user credentials.
NB the client I'm trying to get this working on has Firewall off and no a/v etc for the time being while trying to work this out.
I've updated the NIC driver and there is only 1 iface available. DNS is working and I've matched up all the settings I can find to the working VM and other working machines.
Getting desperate so any ideas would be awesome.
windows-server-2008 windows-7 samba
add a comment |
I have a Samba share on a LAN with 2008 PDC/DNS. Smb authenticates with AD and I have several Win7 Machines that can connect fine.
I recently added a couple of new computers to the LAN which were imaged the same way (same software, etc.; different hardware so different drivers) as the other machines and they have the same policies set.
I can not get the new machines to connect to the samba share no matter what. I am always met with either Unspecified Error 0x80004005
or Network Path not found
.
I've turned off the firewall; set LANMAN auth to respond to NTLM only/send LM & NTLM responses/use NTLM session security if negotiated in Local Sec Policy > SEcurity Options; tried both ip and hostname to connect.
SMB log shows that authentication succeeds; but then connection is immediately killed by the client.
tcpdump shows nothing remarkable except that when trying to connect from the client via hostname there is an unknown packet type error:
ack 201 win 255 NBT Session Packet: Unknown packet type 0xABData: (41 bytes)
Here's a couple of lines from that error:
11:18:37.964991 IP 001-client.domain.local.49372 > smb.domain.local.netbios-ssn: P 1670:2146(476) ack 201 win 255 NBT Session Packet: Unknown packet type 0xABData: (41 bytes)
[000] AA 46 96 FA D5 99 33 75 0C C4 20 CE 26 42 F3 61 252F2263723252313u 14304 316&B363a
[010] F0 8C FB 65 18 17 40 A5 DB 42 BB 94 37 53 92 EC 360214373e3027@245 333B2732247S222354
[020] 55 98 7F C4 AE 3D 6B 10 C4 U230177304256=k20 304
11:18:37.964998 IP smb.domain.local.netbios-ssn > 001-client.domain.local.49372: . ack 2146 win 100
[edit for strike: this turned out to be an issue with arp cache and the client being issued an old ip from dhcp that previously belonged to another machine]
I'm also getting this error consistently:
[2012/09/10 11:50:00.529650, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:1413(setup_new_vc_session)
setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources.
Here's smb.conf just in case (though don't see how if other machines are working fine):
[global]
workgroup = MYDOMAIN
realm = MYDOMAIN.LOCAL
server string = domain|smb share
interfaces = eth1
security = ADS
password server = 192.168.1.3
log level = 2
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
smb ports = 139
strict locking = no
load printers = No
local master = No
domain master = No
wins server = 192.168.1.3
wins support = Yes
idmap uid = 500-10000000
idmap gid = 500-10000000
winbind separator = +
winbind enum users = Yes
winbind enum groups = Yes
winbind use default domain = Yes
[samba-share1]
comment = SMB Share
path = /home/share/smb/
valid users = @"MYDOMAIN+Domain Users"
admin users = @"MYDOMAIN+Domain Admins"
guest ok = no
read only = No
create mask = 0765
force directory mode = 0777
Any ideas what else I could try or look for? Or what might be the problem?
Thanks.
Update 1
Noticed on the other machines that Local Security Policy > LAN Manager authentication level was Not Defined. There is no way to set it as such through the LSP editor, so had to go into regedit and delete HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlLsalmcompatibilitylevel
However, this didn't solve the issue. Am now met with Accessing the resource '\smbshare' has been disallowed
. or Unspecified Error
depending on who I'm logged in as (regular user == former; admin == latter)
Update 2
It's incredibly frustrating when you ask a question on SF and in the interim keep searching for answers only to find a couple of hours later your own question is repeatedly the first google result ;)
Update 3
I ran Wireshark on the client, and so far as I can tell everything on the Samba end is working correctly. I see in a Negotiate Protocol Request an NT Status of STATUS_SUCCESS (which may very well be the authentication success, but don't know).
Everything is pointing to an issue on the Client itself. On other machines, everything works as expected. Including a VM running on my box. It works using both admin and regular user credentials.
NB the client I'm trying to get this working on has Firewall off and no a/v etc for the time being while trying to work this out.
I've updated the NIC driver and there is only 1 iface available. DNS is working and I've matched up all the settings I can find to the working VM and other working machines.
Getting desperate so any ideas would be awesome.
windows-server-2008 windows-7 samba
I have a Samba share on a LAN with 2008 PDC/DNS. Smb authenticates with AD and I have several Win7 Machines that can connect fine.
I recently added a couple of new computers to the LAN which were imaged the same way (same software, etc.; different hardware so different drivers) as the other machines and they have the same policies set.
I can not get the new machines to connect to the samba share no matter what. I am always met with either Unspecified Error 0x80004005
or Network Path not found
.
I've turned off the firewall; set LANMAN auth to respond to NTLM only/send LM & NTLM responses/use NTLM session security if negotiated in Local Sec Policy > SEcurity Options; tried both ip and hostname to connect.
SMB log shows that authentication succeeds; but then connection is immediately killed by the client.
tcpdump shows nothing remarkable except that when trying to connect from the client via hostname there is an unknown packet type error:
ack 201 win 255 NBT Session Packet: Unknown packet type 0xABData: (41 bytes)
Here's a couple of lines from that error:
11:18:37.964991 IP 001-client.domain.local.49372 > smb.domain.local.netbios-ssn: P 1670:2146(476) ack 201 win 255 NBT Session Packet: Unknown packet type 0xABData: (41 bytes)
[000] AA 46 96 FA D5 99 33 75 0C C4 20 CE 26 42 F3 61 252F2263723252313u 14304 316&B363a
[010] F0 8C FB 65 18 17 40 A5 DB 42 BB 94 37 53 92 EC 360214373e3027@245 333B2732247S222354
[020] 55 98 7F C4 AE 3D 6B 10 C4 U230177304256=k20 304
11:18:37.964998 IP smb.domain.local.netbios-ssn > 001-client.domain.local.49372: . ack 2146 win 100
[edit for strike: this turned out to be an issue with arp cache and the client being issued an old ip from dhcp that previously belonged to another machine]
I'm also getting this error consistently:
[2012/09/10 11:50:00.529650, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:1413(setup_new_vc_session)
setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources.
Here's smb.conf just in case (though don't see how if other machines are working fine):
[global]
workgroup = MYDOMAIN
realm = MYDOMAIN.LOCAL
server string = domain|smb share
interfaces = eth1
security = ADS
password server = 192.168.1.3
log level = 2
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
smb ports = 139
strict locking = no
load printers = No
local master = No
domain master = No
wins server = 192.168.1.3
wins support = Yes
idmap uid = 500-10000000
idmap gid = 500-10000000
winbind separator = +
winbind enum users = Yes
winbind enum groups = Yes
winbind use default domain = Yes
[samba-share1]
comment = SMB Share
path = /home/share/smb/
valid users = @"MYDOMAIN+Domain Users"
admin users = @"MYDOMAIN+Domain Admins"
guest ok = no
read only = No
create mask = 0765
force directory mode = 0777
Any ideas what else I could try or look for? Or what might be the problem?
Thanks.
Update 1
Noticed on the other machines that Local Security Policy > LAN Manager authentication level was Not Defined. There is no way to set it as such through the LSP editor, so had to go into regedit and delete HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlLsalmcompatibilitylevel
However, this didn't solve the issue. Am now met with Accessing the resource '\smbshare' has been disallowed
. or Unspecified Error
depending on who I'm logged in as (regular user == former; admin == latter)
Update 2
It's incredibly frustrating when you ask a question on SF and in the interim keep searching for answers only to find a couple of hours later your own question is repeatedly the first google result ;)
Update 3
I ran Wireshark on the client, and so far as I can tell everything on the Samba end is working correctly. I see in a Negotiate Protocol Request an NT Status of STATUS_SUCCESS (which may very well be the authentication success, but don't know).
Everything is pointing to an issue on the Client itself. On other machines, everything works as expected. Including a VM running on my box. It works using both admin and regular user credentials.
NB the client I'm trying to get this working on has Firewall off and no a/v etc for the time being while trying to work this out.
I've updated the NIC driver and there is only 1 iface available. DNS is working and I've matched up all the settings I can find to the working VM and other working machines.
Getting desperate so any ideas would be awesome.
windows-server-2008 windows-7 samba
windows-server-2008 windows-7 samba
edited Sep 10 '12 at 20:09
stormdrain
asked Sep 10 '12 at 15:36
stormdrainstormdrain
78771849
78771849
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
So the issue seems to have been that secpol was set to Digitally Sign Communications (Always).
To fix: Secpol.msc > Local Policies > Security Options > Microsoft network client: Digitally sign communications (always) => Disable
Thanks.
edit:
as the-wabbit said, it is better to update samba to handle the requirement rather than disable it so as to maintain security.
2
SMB signing issues are indeed quite often the cause for connection failures with obscure error messages. But instead of disabling signing altogether, I would advocate enabling it on the Samba server side as it is an important security feature.server signing = mandatory
in the[global]
section of /etc/samba/smb.conf should take care of the problem.
– the-wabbit
Mar 5 '15 at 12:04
1
Maybe this answer might help so that samba signs connections automatically? superuser.com/a/707701/91022
– djhaskin987
Jun 21 '16 at 19:12
add a comment |
If the Samba server runs SMBv1, then new machines with Win10 have a problem, since they're missing the SMBv1 client function. To enable that function, follow this guide from windowscentral.com:
- Open Control Panel (the good old one, not the "touch" version)
- Click on Programs.
- Click on Turn Windows features on or off link.
- Expand the SMB 1.0/CIFS File Sharing Support option.
- Check the SMB 1.0/CIFS Client option.
- Click the OK button.
- Click the Restart now button (restart is really needed since it needs to install the function when turning off the computer)
Alternatively, you can add the linemin protocol = SMB2
to your smb.conf file.
– Mike Lowery
Dec 1 '18 at 1:36
add a comment |
I got 0x80004005
permission error:
for another reason I have no active Client for Microsoft Networks
in my WiFi dangle Network panel
and:
- Change Network security: LAN Manager Authentication Level to “Send LM & NTLM responses”
- Change Minimum Session Security for NTLM SSP to disable “Require 128-bit encryption” into “No Minimum Security”.
and possibly:
- Uninistalling KB2536276.
add a comment |
Set the following registry value to 1
HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetServicesLanmanWorkstationParametersAllowInsecureGuestAuth
If its not there create the value as a DWORD
add a comment |
5 months i was searching whole net why after update win10 cannot acces to network drive on some servers and i got error 0x80004005 and in my case solution was to enable only smb 2 or 3 on server or just on windwos client in registry set value on 1 for: AllowInsecureGuestAuth in key:
HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetServicesLanmanWorkstationParameters
Thank You!!!
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f426010%2fserver-2008-windows-7-samba-unspecified-error-80004005%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
So the issue seems to have been that secpol was set to Digitally Sign Communications (Always).
To fix: Secpol.msc > Local Policies > Security Options > Microsoft network client: Digitally sign communications (always) => Disable
Thanks.
edit:
as the-wabbit said, it is better to update samba to handle the requirement rather than disable it so as to maintain security.
2
SMB signing issues are indeed quite often the cause for connection failures with obscure error messages. But instead of disabling signing altogether, I would advocate enabling it on the Samba server side as it is an important security feature.server signing = mandatory
in the[global]
section of /etc/samba/smb.conf should take care of the problem.
– the-wabbit
Mar 5 '15 at 12:04
1
Maybe this answer might help so that samba signs connections automatically? superuser.com/a/707701/91022
– djhaskin987
Jun 21 '16 at 19:12
add a comment |
So the issue seems to have been that secpol was set to Digitally Sign Communications (Always).
To fix: Secpol.msc > Local Policies > Security Options > Microsoft network client: Digitally sign communications (always) => Disable
Thanks.
edit:
as the-wabbit said, it is better to update samba to handle the requirement rather than disable it so as to maintain security.
2
SMB signing issues are indeed quite often the cause for connection failures with obscure error messages. But instead of disabling signing altogether, I would advocate enabling it on the Samba server side as it is an important security feature.server signing = mandatory
in the[global]
section of /etc/samba/smb.conf should take care of the problem.
– the-wabbit
Mar 5 '15 at 12:04
1
Maybe this answer might help so that samba signs connections automatically? superuser.com/a/707701/91022
– djhaskin987
Jun 21 '16 at 19:12
add a comment |
So the issue seems to have been that secpol was set to Digitally Sign Communications (Always).
To fix: Secpol.msc > Local Policies > Security Options > Microsoft network client: Digitally sign communications (always) => Disable
Thanks.
edit:
as the-wabbit said, it is better to update samba to handle the requirement rather than disable it so as to maintain security.
So the issue seems to have been that secpol was set to Digitally Sign Communications (Always).
To fix: Secpol.msc > Local Policies > Security Options > Microsoft network client: Digitally sign communications (always) => Disable
Thanks.
edit:
as the-wabbit said, it is better to update samba to handle the requirement rather than disable it so as to maintain security.
edited Apr 27 '17 at 13:40
answered Sep 11 '12 at 13:49
stormdrainstormdrain
78771849
78771849
2
SMB signing issues are indeed quite often the cause for connection failures with obscure error messages. But instead of disabling signing altogether, I would advocate enabling it on the Samba server side as it is an important security feature.server signing = mandatory
in the[global]
section of /etc/samba/smb.conf should take care of the problem.
– the-wabbit
Mar 5 '15 at 12:04
1
Maybe this answer might help so that samba signs connections automatically? superuser.com/a/707701/91022
– djhaskin987
Jun 21 '16 at 19:12
add a comment |
2
SMB signing issues are indeed quite often the cause for connection failures with obscure error messages. But instead of disabling signing altogether, I would advocate enabling it on the Samba server side as it is an important security feature.server signing = mandatory
in the[global]
section of /etc/samba/smb.conf should take care of the problem.
– the-wabbit
Mar 5 '15 at 12:04
1
Maybe this answer might help so that samba signs connections automatically? superuser.com/a/707701/91022
– djhaskin987
Jun 21 '16 at 19:12
2
2
SMB signing issues are indeed quite often the cause for connection failures with obscure error messages. But instead of disabling signing altogether, I would advocate enabling it on the Samba server side as it is an important security feature.
server signing = mandatory
in the [global]
section of /etc/samba/smb.conf should take care of the problem.– the-wabbit
Mar 5 '15 at 12:04
SMB signing issues are indeed quite often the cause for connection failures with obscure error messages. But instead of disabling signing altogether, I would advocate enabling it on the Samba server side as it is an important security feature.
server signing = mandatory
in the [global]
section of /etc/samba/smb.conf should take care of the problem.– the-wabbit
Mar 5 '15 at 12:04
1
1
Maybe this answer might help so that samba signs connections automatically? superuser.com/a/707701/91022
– djhaskin987
Jun 21 '16 at 19:12
Maybe this answer might help so that samba signs connections automatically? superuser.com/a/707701/91022
– djhaskin987
Jun 21 '16 at 19:12
add a comment |
If the Samba server runs SMBv1, then new machines with Win10 have a problem, since they're missing the SMBv1 client function. To enable that function, follow this guide from windowscentral.com:
- Open Control Panel (the good old one, not the "touch" version)
- Click on Programs.
- Click on Turn Windows features on or off link.
- Expand the SMB 1.0/CIFS File Sharing Support option.
- Check the SMB 1.0/CIFS Client option.
- Click the OK button.
- Click the Restart now button (restart is really needed since it needs to install the function when turning off the computer)
Alternatively, you can add the linemin protocol = SMB2
to your smb.conf file.
– Mike Lowery
Dec 1 '18 at 1:36
add a comment |
If the Samba server runs SMBv1, then new machines with Win10 have a problem, since they're missing the SMBv1 client function. To enable that function, follow this guide from windowscentral.com:
- Open Control Panel (the good old one, not the "touch" version)
- Click on Programs.
- Click on Turn Windows features on or off link.
- Expand the SMB 1.0/CIFS File Sharing Support option.
- Check the SMB 1.0/CIFS Client option.
- Click the OK button.
- Click the Restart now button (restart is really needed since it needs to install the function when turning off the computer)
Alternatively, you can add the linemin protocol = SMB2
to your smb.conf file.
– Mike Lowery
Dec 1 '18 at 1:36
add a comment |
If the Samba server runs SMBv1, then new machines with Win10 have a problem, since they're missing the SMBv1 client function. To enable that function, follow this guide from windowscentral.com:
- Open Control Panel (the good old one, not the "touch" version)
- Click on Programs.
- Click on Turn Windows features on or off link.
- Expand the SMB 1.0/CIFS File Sharing Support option.
- Check the SMB 1.0/CIFS Client option.
- Click the OK button.
- Click the Restart now button (restart is really needed since it needs to install the function when turning off the computer)
If the Samba server runs SMBv1, then new machines with Win10 have a problem, since they're missing the SMBv1 client function. To enable that function, follow this guide from windowscentral.com:
- Open Control Panel (the good old one, not the "touch" version)
- Click on Programs.
- Click on Turn Windows features on or off link.
- Expand the SMB 1.0/CIFS File Sharing Support option.
- Check the SMB 1.0/CIFS Client option.
- Click the OK button.
- Click the Restart now button (restart is really needed since it needs to install the function when turning off the computer)
answered Aug 6 '18 at 10:27
Martin PeckaMartin Pecka
1235
1235
Alternatively, you can add the linemin protocol = SMB2
to your smb.conf file.
– Mike Lowery
Dec 1 '18 at 1:36
add a comment |
Alternatively, you can add the linemin protocol = SMB2
to your smb.conf file.
– Mike Lowery
Dec 1 '18 at 1:36
Alternatively, you can add the line
min protocol = SMB2
to your smb.conf file.– Mike Lowery
Dec 1 '18 at 1:36
Alternatively, you can add the line
min protocol = SMB2
to your smb.conf file.– Mike Lowery
Dec 1 '18 at 1:36
add a comment |
I got 0x80004005
permission error:
for another reason I have no active Client for Microsoft Networks
in my WiFi dangle Network panel
and:
- Change Network security: LAN Manager Authentication Level to “Send LM & NTLM responses”
- Change Minimum Session Security for NTLM SSP to disable “Require 128-bit encryption” into “No Minimum Security”.
and possibly:
- Uninistalling KB2536276.
add a comment |
I got 0x80004005
permission error:
for another reason I have no active Client for Microsoft Networks
in my WiFi dangle Network panel
and:
- Change Network security: LAN Manager Authentication Level to “Send LM & NTLM responses”
- Change Minimum Session Security for NTLM SSP to disable “Require 128-bit encryption” into “No Minimum Security”.
and possibly:
- Uninistalling KB2536276.
add a comment |
I got 0x80004005
permission error:
for another reason I have no active Client for Microsoft Networks
in my WiFi dangle Network panel
and:
- Change Network security: LAN Manager Authentication Level to “Send LM & NTLM responses”
- Change Minimum Session Security for NTLM SSP to disable “Require 128-bit encryption” into “No Minimum Security”.
and possibly:
- Uninistalling KB2536276.
I got 0x80004005
permission error:
for another reason I have no active Client for Microsoft Networks
in my WiFi dangle Network panel
and:
- Change Network security: LAN Manager Authentication Level to “Send LM & NTLM responses”
- Change Minimum Session Security for NTLM SSP to disable “Require 128-bit encryption” into “No Minimum Security”.
and possibly:
- Uninistalling KB2536276.
answered Mar 18 '14 at 19:56
gavenkoagavenkoa
31848
31848
add a comment |
add a comment |
Set the following registry value to 1
HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetServicesLanmanWorkstationParametersAllowInsecureGuestAuth
If its not there create the value as a DWORD
add a comment |
Set the following registry value to 1
HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetServicesLanmanWorkstationParametersAllowInsecureGuestAuth
If its not there create the value as a DWORD
add a comment |
Set the following registry value to 1
HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetServicesLanmanWorkstationParametersAllowInsecureGuestAuth
If its not there create the value as a DWORD
Set the following registry value to 1
HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetServicesLanmanWorkstationParametersAllowInsecureGuestAuth
If its not there create the value as a DWORD
answered Nov 5 '18 at 23:34
user336558user336558
113
113
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 months i was searching whole net why after update win10 cannot acces to network drive on some servers and i got error 0x80004005 and in my case solution was to enable only smb 2 or 3 on server or just on windwos client in registry set value on 1 for: AllowInsecureGuestAuth in key:
HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetServicesLanmanWorkstationParameters
Thank You!!!
New contributor
add a comment |
5 months i was searching whole net why after update win10 cannot acces to network drive on some servers and i got error 0x80004005 and in my case solution was to enable only smb 2 or 3 on server or just on windwos client in registry set value on 1 for: AllowInsecureGuestAuth in key:
HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetServicesLanmanWorkstationParameters
Thank You!!!
New contributor
add a comment |
5 months i was searching whole net why after update win10 cannot acces to network drive on some servers and i got error 0x80004005 and in my case solution was to enable only smb 2 or 3 on server or just on windwos client in registry set value on 1 for: AllowInsecureGuestAuth in key:
HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetServicesLanmanWorkstationParameters
Thank You!!!
New contributor
5 months i was searching whole net why after update win10 cannot acces to network drive on some servers and i got error 0x80004005 and in my case solution was to enable only smb 2 or 3 on server or just on windwos client in registry set value on 1 for: AllowInsecureGuestAuth in key:
HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetServicesLanmanWorkstationParameters
Thank You!!!
New contributor
New contributor
answered 3 hours ago
Grzegorz BednarskiGrzegorz Bednarski
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f426010%2fserver-2008-windows-7-samba-unspecified-error-80004005%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown